On Feb 1, 2008 12:27 PM, Robin Helgelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 1, 2008 12:14 PM, Emmanuel Sowah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, I don't know if they are great committers, else they could have > chosen > > the challenging path of making each major Tapestry realease fully > backward > > compatible. They rather choose the easy and trivial path of rewriting > from > > scratch disregarding previous versions, which IMHO anyone can do. I > don't > > call such people great. The great guys are Gavin King, Rod Johnson, > Juergen > > Holler, etc. These guys are so genius! > > Not going to feed that troll on that one, but what's the problem? T4 > and T5 live happily together where T4 still is maintained.
Yes, I agree T4 and T5 are happily living their *separate *lives together. In other communities they make releases live *married *lives together. You'll feel the music in your spines when your boss asks you to adopt some T5 features in your existing T3 or T4 application. Emmanuel > > > -- > regards, > Robin > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
