Re: Tapestry 3.x DEAD

2007-02-04 Thread Jeff Poetker
To anybody whom it may concern... The threading problem referred to in this thread, can be worked around by overriding the AbstractEngine's protected createComponentClassEnhancer method to return a synchronized version of the enhancer. This makes 3.0.4 work like earlier versions of Tapest

RE: Tapestry 3.x DEAD

2007-01-31 Thread Mark Stang
enior Engineer/Architect office: +1 303.468.2900 mobile: +1 303.507.2833 Ping Identity -Original Message- From: Jesse Kuhnert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 1/31/2007 2:13 PM To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: Tapestry 3.x DEAD I don't remember the details surrounding the 3.0.4 r

Re: Tapestry 3.x DEAD

2007-01-31 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
ot;released", but it looks like it got half way there and then died. regards, Mark Mark J. Stang Senior Engineer/Architect office: +1 303.468.2900 mobile: +1 303.507.2833 Ping Identity -Original Message- From: Jesse Kuhnert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 1/31/2007 1:27 PM To:

RE: Tapestry 3.x DEAD

2007-01-31 Thread Mark Stang
1:27 PM To: Tapestry users Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Tapestry 3.x DEAD I don't know what's wrong with the dynamic url stuff (I did test it before updating the main site), but you can always get it from: http://www.apache.org/dist/tapestry/ On 1/31/07, Mark Stang <[EMAIL

Re: Tapestry 3.x DEAD

2007-01-31 Thread Jesse Kuhnert
I don't know what's wrong with the dynamic url stuff (I did test it before updating the main site), but you can always get it from: http://www.apache.org/dist/tapestry/ On 1/31/07, Mark Stang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Howard, It appears that development on 3.x has stalled to a complete stop.

Tapestry 3.x DEAD

2007-01-31 Thread Mark Stang
Howard, It appears that development on 3.x has stalled to a complete stop. The web-site lists the latest 3.x release as 3.0.4. According to the "news" it says 3.0.4 has hundreds of bug fixes. What it doesn't show is that 3.0.4 has a threading issue. The issue was identified over two months ag