Jesse, I don't think the dynamic url stuff is the issue. Actually, there are two issues. The first issue is the threading bug. The next issue is that 3.0.4 was never fully released, as I understand it, due to the threading bug. Which is why it isn't on the mirrors. It is supposed to be "released", but it looks like it got half way there and then died.
regards, Mark Mark J. Stang Senior Engineer/Architect office: +1 303.468.2900 mobile: +1 303.507.2833 Ping Identity -----Original Message----- From: Jesse Kuhnert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 1/31/2007 1:27 PM To: Tapestry users Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Tapestry 3.x DEAD I don't know what's wrong with the dynamic url stuff (I did test it before updating the main site), but you can always get it from: http://www.apache.org/dist/tapestry/ On 1/31/07, Mark Stang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Howard, > It appears that development on 3.x has stalled to a complete stop. The > web-site lists the latest 3.x release as 3.0.4. According to the "news" it > says 3.0.4 has hundreds of bug fixes. What it doesn't show is that 3.0.4 has > a threading issue. The issue was identified over two months ago. The 3.0.4 > is not on any of the mirrors, I guess because of the bug. > > All-in-all, it appears that not only is 3.x dead but there is a "bad" version > sitting out there mis-leading potential users. Unless someone is going to > pick up 3.x, the web site should be reverted back to 3.0.3. Then 3.0.4 and > 3.0.5 should be deleted and all JIRA issues reflecting the fixes that were > done should be re-listed as outstanding. Those "fixes" which happened in > 3.0.4 are still a problem for anyone using 3.0.3 but JIRA says they were > fixed. > > The web site might as well show that 3.x is dead and tell everyone that it > will no longer be maintained. > > Mark > > Mark J. Stang > Senior Engineer/Architect > office: +1 303.468.2900 > mobile: +1 303.507.2833 > Ping Identity > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Stang > Sent: Tue 1/30/2007 11:33 PM > To: Tapestry users; Tapestry users > Subject: RE: FW: Tapestry 3.0.4..not on mirrors > > Nick, > Thanks for pointing that out, I finally found the e-mail trail. I decided > that I couldn't take a chance on 3.0.4 and reverted back to 3.0.3. I guess > we are done with 3.x and will wait for 5.x or the next great GUI Framework. > Tapestry has been fun and very interesting. > > regards, > > Mark > > Mark J. Stang > Senior Engineer/Architect > office: +1 303.468.2900 > mobile: +1 303.507.2833 > Ping Identity > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Nick Westgate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tue 1/30/2007 8:10 PM > To: Tapestry users > Subject: Re: FW: Tapestry 3.0.4..not on mirrors > > Hi Mark. > > I'm referring to this thread: > "3.0.4 and repetitive method name/signature problem (class enhancement)" > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.tapestry.user/43121 > > Take it to the dev list when you've read that. > (I'm not a dev, so as to who is managing 3 now ...) > > Cheers, > Nick. > > > Mark Stang wrote: > > Nick, > > I did a quick look and only saw references to 4.x. If 3.0.4 is not the > > current release, then why does the Tapestry Web site have it listed as such? > > > > http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry3/ > > > > Who is managing this? > > > > thanks, > > > > Mark > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- Jesse Kuhnert Tapestry/Dojo team member/developer Open source based consulting work centered around dojo/tapestry/tacos/hivemind. http://blog.opencomponentry.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
