ly cool.
>
> So I will keep you posted when ready.
>
> Thanks
>
> KEN
>
>
>
>
>> To: users@tapestry.apache.org; kcola...@live.com
>> Subject: Re: class type notation
>> Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 23:45:42 -0300
>> From: thiag...@gmail.com
>>
used it
in T-4.1.2 and it is fairly cool.
So I will keep you posted when ready.
Thanks
KEN
> To: users@tapestry.apache.org; kcola...@live.com
> Subject: Re: class type notation
> Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 23:45:42 -0300
> From: thiag...@gmail.com
>
> On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 02:3
On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 02:31:47 -0300, Ken in Nashua
wrote:
Hi All,
Hi!
I am doing a custom gallery widget... ok I am upgrading my t-4.1.2
gallery to T5... fun stuff...
Is the class type notation still legal ?
I am referring to this guy...
collectionType="ognl:@org.tynamo.example
There is no need for it, the type is inferred from the parameter. So
in your Gallery.java you would have
@Parameter
private Person person;
See http://tapestry.apache.org/component-parameters.html
The same goes for when you're looping:
...
only needs
@Property
private List person;
@Property
