Thanks Thiago... No I really dont have to pass the classtype as the parameter... I can hardwire it in the java class.
My code is still in prototype development state... and I appreciate your taking the time and helping. I am upgrading my Gallery widget... and happy to share when done... I used it in T-4.1.2 and it is fairly cool. So I will keep you posted when ready. Thanks KEN > To: users@tapestry.apache.org; kcola...@live.com > Subject: Re: class type notation > Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 23:45:42 -0300 > From: thiag...@gmail.com > > On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 02:31:47 -0300, Ken in Nashua <kcola...@live.com> > wrote: > > > Hi All, > > Hi! > > > I am doing a custom gallery widget... ok I am upgrading my t-4.1.2 > > gallery to T5... fun stuff... > > > > Is the class type notation still legal ? > > > > <t:Gallery t:id="GalleryWidget" > > > > collectionType="ognl:@org.tynamo.examples.hibernatesecurity.model.admin.Person@class" > > itemsPerPage="itemsPerPage" > > tableColumns="tableColumns" > > cursor="cursor" > > /> > > > > I am referring to this guy... > > collectionType="ognl:@org.tynamo.examples.hibernatesecurity.model.admin.Person@class" > > Tapestry 5 doesn't support OGNL out-of-the-box, but Chenille Kit does add > an OGNL binding. > > Do you really need to pass the collection type as a parameter? > > -- > Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo > Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer, > and instructor > Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda. > http://www.arsmachina.com.br
