On 4/18/08, Angelo Turetta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And why your hypothetical 1.0 need not to be compatible with 2.0, whereas
> just because Tapestry 4.0 is not compatible with 5.0 you feel like defending
> someone deliberately insulting Howard?
In my humble opinion, Yura is not defending Rob
Yura Tkachenko wrote:
I hope after reading my post you won't add me to this page -
http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry/Tapestry5Trolls
I really want to defend Rob :-) Since some of his points are real problems
of Tapestry.
I will say it again: backward compatibility.
Of course major releases shouldn'
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
2008/4/11, Rob Smeets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> And especially, Howard himself recently participates in the answering of
> questions. Thanks to the stiff competition out there in the webframework
> space that has triggered this. His ego we
A big hello and thanks to Rob!
Reading this post it came to my mind through Rob's playing the devils
advocate here he is really improving this user-list's community.
And there are one personal experience and one common though to share
with you.
1. Personal experience with Wicket
Long befor
Great post Onno! +1
Like Jan, I also find Rob pretty amusing. You never know, maybe one day his
messages about the version incompatibilities will help someone who has somehow
managed to miss the statements on the Tapestry site, however unlikely that
might be.
> > Take for example Kent Tong, th
ay, April 11, 2008 10:34 AM
> To: Tapestry users
> Subject: Re: Getting Answers on the User List
>
> And especially, Howard himself recently participates in the answering of
> questions. Thanks to the stiff competition out there in the webframework
> space that has triggered this
> Take for example Kent Tong, the former Tapestry commiter. He has now even
> written a book on
> Wicket.
..and he has written yet another one on JSF after that. So clearly he must
not like Wicket very much :o)
Seriously though: I have used Tapestry 3 on several projects. I've used
Tapestry 4 o
Howard,
Do like I do - just laugh at his remarks. At first I thought it was
annoying, now I think they're actually quite funny. Not that they have any
technical merit.
-J.
> Yawn.
>
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 7:33 AM, Rob Smeets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> And especially, Howard himself recentl
Yawn.
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 7:33 AM, Rob Smeets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And especially, Howard himself recently participates in the answering of
> questions. Thanks to the stiff competition out there in the webframework
> space that has triggered this. His ego went too high and I'm glad h
And especially, Howard himself recently participates in the answering of
questions. Thanks to the stiff competition out there in the webframework
space that has triggered this. His ego went too high and I'm glad he is
finally humbling himself. It's rather unfortunate he got awaken only after
Tapest
That's what I'm talkin' about!
Francois Armand wrote:
> Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
>> Just want to say thanks to everyone whose providing answers and
>> support on the users list. I'm really impressed by how much Tapestry
>> 5 knowledge is out there.
>>
> Not to forget the irc channel on freenod
Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
Just want to say thanks to everyone whose providing answers and
support on the users list. I'm really impressed by how much Tapestry
5 knowledge is out there.
Not to forget the irc channel on freenode: #tapestry ;)
--
Francois Armand
Etudes & Développements J2EE
Gro
Hi Howard,
Tapestry mailing is a very active forum, I learned a lot from it, answers
are usually relevant. second to this is is, usenet's java language, you will
get more answers than you need, lately I asked a simple question and I got
125 responses, and the number still growing:
http://groups.
13 matches
Mail list logo
