estry in a much shorter
> time period.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: p...@sartini-its.com [mailto:p...@sartini-its.com] On Behalf Of Piero
> Sartini
> Sent: 24 December 2009 20:34
> To: Tapestry users
> Subject: Re: About T5 integration modules
>
> ..
try to be all things to all people - and perhaps lessen the
perceived gap between tech. like Wicket and Tapestry in a much shorter
time period.
-Original Message-
From: p...@sartini-its.com [mailto:p...@sartini-its.com] On Behalf Of Piero
Sartini
Sent: 24 December 2009 20:34
To: Tapestry
It has been much talk about Tapestry lacking an annotation-based security
framework.
Don't you guys know about tapestry-security, which is a Tapestry module that
uses Spring Security (formerly Acegi) under the covers?
Olle Hallin
Senior Java Developer and Architect
olle.hal...@crisp.se
www.crisp.
Il 28/12/2009 09:46, Massimo Lusetti ha scritto:
> Comparing Drupal to Tapestry is somehow comparing apples with an apple-pie
That's true but...
I tried not to mention Wicket/Brix and Wicket/Hippo (for not starting a
flame). Both of these frameworks can be used as more pertaining examples
of what
Il 28/12/2009 06:53, Kalle Korhonen ha scritto:
> Hey Alessandro, I have to say I agree with pretty much everything
> you've said. I notice the tone from the committers is a bit "fatherly"
> - i.e. "just learn the framework and do it yourself, it's easy". Don't
> worry about it, sometimes it's just
Original Message -
From: "Howard Lewis Ship"
To: "Tapestry users"
Sent: Thursday, 24 December, 2009 20:50:35 GMT +02:00 Athens, Beirut,
Bucharest, Istanbul
Subject: Re: About T5 integration modules
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 2:09 AM, cordenier christophe
wrote:
> He
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 6:53 AM, Kalle Korhonen
wrote:
> technology. I think your comparison to Drupal is spot on. Sure it's
Comparing Tapestry to Drupal is somehow comparing apples with an apple-pie.
Cheers
--
Massimo
http://meridio.blogspot.com
--
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 6:53 AM, Kalle Korhonen
wrote:
> technology. I think your comparison to Drupal is spot on. Sure it's
Comparing Drupal to Tapestry is somehow comparing apples with an apple-pie
Cheers
--
Massimo
http://meridio.blogspot.com
---
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 1:52 AM, Alessandro Bottoni
wrote:
> If Tapestry does not offer anything for my Authentication/Authorization
> needs, I will just look somewhere else, for example at Spring's site
> (ACEGI/Spring security). I will not reinvent the n-th wheel by myself.
> If Tapestry wants t
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Alessandro Bottoni
wrote:
> This is a very good example of what is probably missing in Tapestry, at
> least from the point of view of a new user.
>
> Is this technique documented somewhere?
> Is this demonstrated by some existing archetype or demo app?
> Is this
Em Thu, 24 Dec 2009 09:17:14 -0200, Ivano Luberti
escreveu:
Ciao, Ivano! :)
Thiago, every time I see your solutions and the easyness with which you
find them I wonder how you have learned to use Tapestry.
Do you are involved in design and development of Tapestry core ? Are
you a committer
Hello Howard,
Actually, security was only an exemple. And because, i am pretty new to
spring-security and to be honest, not really convinced at the moment, i will
not try to defend it.
But my question was : What about the Integration of Tapestry in other
Framework ? Because many people talked abo
Il 24/12/2009 19:50, Howard Lewis Ship ha scritto:
> I'm also a bit surprised at how eager people are to make use of
> cumbersome solutions like Spring Security to accomplish simple tasks
> such
> as protecting pages. The Spring Security logic is path-based,
> requiring an awkward mapping from pat
Hi,
About pages protected access, I think that the tapestry5-portlet module will
provide (through portal platform) implementations of much of the common
functionality that any web-based application would require: role-based
security (including authentication and authorization), user registration a
> I'm also a bit surprised at how eager people are to make use of
> cumbersome solutions like Spring Security to accomplish simple tasks
> such
> as protecting pages. The Spring Security logic is path-based,
> requiring an awkward mapping from paths to Tapestry pages. When I
> need to implement t
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 2:09 AM, cordenier christophe
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> And what about integration of Tapestry in other framework ?
>
> From my experience view, integrating technologies in Tapestry is fun and
> fast, and the one provided by Tapestry are really good and enough to do what
> a Web
Thiago, every time I see your solutions and the easyness with which you
find them I wonder how you have learned to use Tapestry.
Do you are involved in design and development of Tapestry core ? Are
you a committer that hase learned by using it?
Knowing that could really show the way to others , w
Em Thu, 24 Dec 2009 07:40:09 -0200, Gerald Bauer
escreveu:
I agree with you but I don't think that is the issue here. The question
was how come with Frameworks such as Wicket there is an explosion of
integrationmodules written and well documented whereas in Tapestry there
is only a
handf
Hello,
And what about integration of Tapestry in other framework ?
>From my experience view, integrating technologies in Tapestry is fun and
fast, and the one provided by Tapestry are really good and enough to do what
a Web Application should do. !but when i want to do the inverse i am facing
a p
Howard,
I agree with you but I don't think that is the issue here. The question was
how come with Frameworks such as Wicket there is an explosion of integration
modules written and well documented whereas in Tapestry there is only a
handful. Is this because Tapestry is too complex for achieving su
20 matches
Mail list logo
