Re: [OT] The response time of websites - comparison between frameworks

2011-06-13 Thread Kalle Korhonen
... and the graph's updated: http://www.jtict.com/blog/rails-wicket-grails-play-lift-jsp/. Check the concurrent users vs response time - Tapestry is beating JSP as well :) Might be worth mentioning at tapestry.apache.org. I'll update the test app to use T5.3 once an alpha version is out. Kalle O

Re: [OT] The response time of websites - comparison between frameworks

2011-06-13 Thread Massimo Lusetti
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Kalle Korhonen wrote: > Tapestry is officially very, very fast: > http://www.jtict.com/blog/rails-wicket-grails-play-lift-jsp/comment-page-1/#comment-22319. > We of course knew that already but I hope the author updates the > graph. Nice! Cheers -- Massimo http:

Re: [OT] The response time of websites - comparison between frameworks

2011-06-13 Thread Nicolas Barrera
sweet figures! cheers Nicolás.- On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Kalle Korhonen wrote: > Tapestry is officially very, very fast: > > http://www.jtict.com/blog/rails-wicket-grails-play-lift-jsp/comment-page-1/#comment-22319 > . > We of course knew that already but I hope the author updates th

Re: [OT] The response time of websites - comparison between frameworks

2011-06-13 Thread Kalle Korhonen
Tapestry is officially very, very fast: http://www.jtict.com/blog/rails-wicket-grails-play-lift-jsp/comment-page-1/#comment-22319. We of course knew that already but I hope the author updates the graph. Kalle On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Massimo Lusetti wrote: > On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 7:30

Re: [OT] The response time of websites - comparison between frameworks

2011-06-08 Thread Massimo Lusetti
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Kalle Korhonen wrote: > I really didn't want to say anything definitive about since I didn't > run it on a dedicated, clean test bed or anything. I just run the > benchmark for some time on my development machine, mostly comparing > against Wicket (just because I c

Re: [OT] The response time of websites - comparison between frameworks

2011-06-07 Thread Kalle Korhonen
I really didn't want to say anything definitive about since I didn't run it on a dedicated, clean test bed or anything. I just run the benchmark for some time on my development machine, mostly comparing against Wicket (just because I copied Wicket's templates as a basis) and the throughput (of Tape

Re: [OT] The response time of websites - comparison between frameworks

2011-06-07 Thread Josh Canfield
> Pull request sent: https://github.com/jtdev/blogpost_files/pull/4 Did you run the other tests and do your own comparison? On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Kalle Korhonen wrote: > > Kalle > > > On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Kalle Korhonen > wrote: >> Yes, I'll write the sample app. Started

Re: [OT] The response time of websites - comparison between frameworks

2011-06-07 Thread Igor Drobiazko
Great. Thank you. On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Kalle Korhonen wrote: > Pull request sent: https://github.com/jtdev/blogpost_files/pull/4 > > Kalle > > > On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Kalle Korhonen > wrote: > > Yes, I'll write the sample app. Started already but didn't have much > > time l

Re: [OT] The response time of websites - comparison between frameworks

2011-06-07 Thread Massimo Lusetti
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Kalle Korhonen wrote: > Pull request sent: https://github.com/jtdev/blogpost_files/pull/4 > > Kalle Great Kalle! ... Eager to see results! Cheers -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com - To uns

Re: [OT] The response time of websites - comparison between frameworks

2011-06-06 Thread Kalle Korhonen
Pull request sent: https://github.com/jtdev/blogpost_files/pull/4 Kalle On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Kalle Korhonen wrote: > Yes, I'll write the sample app. Started already but didn't have much > time last week, this week looks better. It shouldn't take too long. > > Kalle > > > On Mon, Jun

Re: [OT] The response time of websites - comparison between frameworks

2011-06-06 Thread Kalle Korhonen
Yes, I'll write the sample app. Started already but didn't have much time last week, this week looks better. It shouldn't take too long. Kalle On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Igor Drobiazko wrote: > Hi Kalle, > > what is the status? Did you have a chance to provide an app to be covered by > th

Re: [OT] The response time of websites - comparison between frameworks

2011-06-06 Thread Igor Drobiazko
Hi Kalle, what is the status? Did you have a chance to provide an app to be covered by the comparison. It would be nice to see how Tapestry performs. On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Kalle Korhonen wrote: > No, but Tapestry's got to make it to these comparisons to stay as a > contender. Has anyb

Re: [OT] The response time of websites - comparison between frameworks

2011-05-31 Thread Kalle Korhonen
No, but Tapestry's got to make it to these comparisons to stay as a contender. Has anybody tried contacting the author? If not, I'll see what I can do. Kalle On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Massimo Lusetti wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Borut Bolčina > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> ju

Re: [OT] The response time of websites - comparison between frameworks

2011-05-31 Thread Massimo Lusetti
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Borut Bolčina wrote: > Hello, > > just wanted to share this link > > http://www.jtict.com/blog/rails-wicket-grails-play-lift-jsp/ A quick search of "tapestry" doesn't reveal anything... Am I missing something? Cheers -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com ---