On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Kalle Korhonen <kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I really didn't want to say anything definitive about since I didn't > run it on a dedicated, clean test bed or anything. I just run the > benchmark for some time on my development machine, mostly comparing > against Wicket (just because I copied Wicket's templates as a basis) > and the throughput (of Tapestry) looked very good. There are lot of > variables though and just .jmx doesn't tell when and how the > measurements are taken, so the original author really needs to run it > the same way on the same platform to make any objective comparisons. Too fair Kalle.... Too fair! ;-) Cheers -- Massimo http://meridio.blogspot.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
