Re: Java based spring configuration

2011-05-05 Thread Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
On Thu, 05 May 2011 09:43:18 -0300, Magnus Kvalheim wrote: Hi Thiago - thanks for your answer, Hi! You're welcome! Think an implementation similar to tapestry-spring would the better alternative of the two. Agreed. It's not completely clear to me what the difference is between an Obje

Re: Java based spring configuration

2011-05-05 Thread Magnus Kvalheim
Hi Thiago - thanks for your answer, See comments below... On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo < thiag...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, 04 May 2011 12:51:05 -0300, Magnus Kvalheim > wrote: > > >> How would I make that play with Tapestry? >> *=Server=* >> * Use a JEE 6 Web

Re: Java based spring configuration

2011-05-04 Thread Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
On Wed, 04 May 2011 12:51:05 -0300, Magnus Kvalheim wrote: Hi Adam, Hi! In fact at this point the main reason(s) I have for still using it is for it's transaction management. And as our apps run in a servlet container(tomcat) I've not really considered ejb's as an alternative. EJB 3.1 c

Re: Java based spring configuration

2011-05-04 Thread Magnus Kvalheim
- > or > > if it's indeed a good idea... > > I know I'd rather configure spring from tapestry ioc if I could... > > > > Thoughts? > > > > cheers > > Magnus > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 5:13 PM, 3kkkdang wrote: > > &

Re: Java based spring configuration

2011-04-27 Thread thana
tapestry5 org.apache.tapestry5.spring.TapestrySpringFilter bit this does not help., shall i register this as a bug ? or are there any fix for this ? -- View this message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Java-based-spring-configuration-tp3394086p4343320.html Sent from

Re: Java based spring configuration

2011-04-04 Thread Taha Hafeez
Hi We are also in the final stage of migrating a wicket-spring-hibernate application into tapestry-tapestryioc-hibernate application. We are very happy with the new it. With Transactional, we had to create a simple module of our own... regards Taha On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Thiago H. de Pa

Re: Java based spring configuration

2011-04-04 Thread Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 19:35:52 -0300, Magnus Kvalheim wrote: Why is it that the tapestry module is only for web - can't it be re-factored/reconfigured so that it can be more closely integrated with spring applications... Tapestry-IoC is not only for web: it's absolutely independent from T

Re: Java based spring configuration

2011-04-02 Thread Adam Zimowski
ebApplicationContextUtils >> to >> get spring context and set this context as ASO static property.  finally in >> tapestry page class, get spring context through ASO. >> >> never got chance to try this, it might work.  any comments? >> >> -- >> Vi

Re: Java based spring configuration

2011-04-01 Thread Magnus Kvalheim
trFilter, in its constructor use WebApplicationContextUtils > to > get spring context and set this context as ASO static property. finally in > tapestry page class, get spring context through ASO. > > never got chance to try this, it might work. any comments? > >

Re: Java based spring configuration

2011-04-01 Thread 3kkkdang
message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Java-based-spring-configuration-tp3394086p4275778.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr

Java based spring configuration

2011-02-21 Thread Bård Magnus Kvalheim
Hi all, Versions Tapestry: 5.2.4 Spring: 3.1.0.M1 We're using java based container configuration with spring - so no xml files are used for configuring beanfactories. With tapestry-spring this is currently unsupported as TapestryApplicationContext extends from XmlWebApplicationContext. As a wor