> I need spring [...] for things like jpa support and transactions and other > things ...
I guess you're not an EJB fan :-) You don't need spring. In fact, our Ecom app runs on pure Tapestry+TapIOC (plus Apache commons lang) with EJB3 in the middle tier doing all the heavy lifting you're talking about (Transactions, Hibernate/JPA, Endeca, PeopleSoft, and much more) We used to heavily rely on Spring in the previous Struts-based version of our app, but since we've moved to Tapestry, we kissed Spring good bye and nobody misses it here :) Adam On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Magnus Kvalheim <mag...@kvalheim.dk> wrote: > Hi thanks for your reply, > > Looking back on my original mail I now realize I've been unclear... > > To clarify: What I do want to achieve is to > + Not rely on xml for configuration > + Inject spring beans into tapestry > (+) Injecting tapestry services into spring is desired > > Your suggestion would probably work, but it's not what I want as I's like to > use the @Inject for spring beans. > Sorry for the confusion... > > > On another note... > > Tapestry IOC is much more desirable than spring in many ways. > I need spring (at least I believe I do) for things like jpa support and > transactions and other things, but the bootstrapping in tapestry of modules, > contributions, decoration.++ is something I would like to get into 'core' > and not just 'web'. > > Why is it that the tapestry module is only for web - can't it > be re-factored/reconfigured so that it can be more closely integrated with > spring applications... > > I'd love to fully embrace tapestry IOC for my core infrastructure, but cant > see how I'd get the same functionality - especially in terms of transaction > management (I'd like to hear from those who have made the transition, and > how they did it). > Is it's possible(I believe it is) to make an enhanced tapestry-spring module > which is not only for web, but can integrate tighter with spring - I think > it would be a great win. > (Probably there is way to implement tapestry ioc contributions, advisors > etc.. for spring beans as well...) > > I'd like to hear some feedback to check if I'm completely off base here - or > if it's indeed a good idea... > I know I'd rather configure spring from tapestry ioc if I could... > > Thoughts? > > cheers > Magnus > > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 5:13 PM, 3kkkdang <cvcv2...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> I will do this: >> extends TapestrFilter, in its constructor use WebApplicationContextUtils >> to >> get spring context and set this context as ASO static property. finally in >> tapestry page class, get spring context through ASO. >> >> never got chance to try this, it might work. any comments? >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Java-based-spring-configuration-tp3394086p4275778.html >> Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
