(assuming this will make it through moderation!)
[T3] Spindle for *Tapestry 3* and Eclipse 3.4
A build (3.4.1) of Spindle for Tapestry 3 that works correctly in
Eclipse 3.4.X has been published.
Please read the release notes as it is *not* available from the old
update site. Eventually the old u
Francis Amanfo - I admire your passion. Please don't hijack my name or
situation to push your agenda. I feel as strongly as anyone else who is pro
tooling but to use me as a basis for attack on Howard alienates many and
does nothing to further your wishes. I feel it belittles my many years of
hard
I unsubscribed (and have the final GOODBYE message to prove it) but I'm
still getting mail..
More to follow about IDE support
Geoff
It's been a blast...
http://jroller.com/page/glongman?entry=time_to_move_on
Geoff
file
Regards,
Ryan
On Tuesday, June 27, 2006, at 12:01PM, Geoff Longman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>There's a bigger problem here. During normal Tapestry operation
>network requests will never be made for the DTD's, the
>SpecificationParser is hardwired to pull them from the
There's a bigger problem here. During normal Tapestry operation
network requests will never be made for the DTD's, the
SpecificationParser is hardwired to pull them from the Tapestry jar.
Are you running some external tool that needs the DTDs?
Geoff
On 6/27/06, Norbert Sándor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would beg to differ. Hivemind is not optional in many cases, the
following are items that I think are not unusual things to do in
Tapestry and all require knowledge of Hivemind.
Override or provide new services:
http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry4/UsersGuide/upgrade.html#upgrade.service
(This
oops wrong list.
On 6/18/06, Geoff Longman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I know a handful, and except in one case I was the person who
introduced all of them to the framework. But I've never heard a peep
from any others.
Just wondering.
Geoff
--
The Spindle guy. http://spindle.
nd of conventions do you have in mind for Tapestry to enforce?
-Original Message-
From: Geoff Longman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 3:48 PM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: custom namespace
Geez, I need to socialize more here. We have 14 developers.
Geoff
On 6/15/06
Geez, I need to socialize more here. We have 14 developers.
Geoff
On 6/15/06, Geoff Longman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I wonder how hard it is to break from the conventions in Rails. I
would expect that with Tapestry+HM it would be pretty easy.
Tapestry, in some cases, has to
o convention.
Geoff
On 6/15/06, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nothing's wrong with conventions. Tapestry already uses them somewhat (page
names map to classnames in the default page package). Rails gets a *lot*
done by just using conventions.
-----Original Message-
Fro
]
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2006 3:20 PM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: custom namespace
+1 for that rant.
Geoff Longman wrote:
> Good God No!
>
> While I love the idea of auto discovery of libraries, every time I see
> a quick suggestion to use Hivemind I cringe.
>
> IMO HM is *
ut it in the META-INF
dir of the jar and have Tapestry autodiscover it.
?
Geoff
On 6/15/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the context of that suggestion, where would you see this configuration
> data going ?
>
> On 6/15/06, Geoff Longman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
context of that suggestion, where would you see this configuration
data going ?
On 6/15/06, Geoff Longman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Good God No!
>
> While I love the idea of auto discovery of libraries, every time I see
> a quick suggestion to use Hivemind I cringe.
&g
ur portlet applications.
John
- Original Message
From: Geoff Longman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Tapestry users
Sent: Thursday, 15 June, 2006 3:30:50 PM
Subject: Re: To Generate Tapestry Page Class Before 1st Access
Trying to do this is a wasted effort regardless of the tool chosen to d
s which means that because of this
issue, many libraries must be specified "by hand".
Not a big problem, just tried to avoid it :)
Regards,
Norbi
Geoff Longman wrote:
> Yes, that's true. But is that really a problem? Contrib has the same
> issue.
>
> Geoff
>
> On
Yes, that's true. But is that really a problem? Contrib has the same issue.
Geoff
On 6/15/06, Norbert Sándor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks!
This means that I must force the user of my component library to define
my library with a fix alias in the .application file.
Regards,
Norbi
Jesse K
Trying to do this is a wasted effort regardless of the tool chosen to do it.
I mean that even if you hit every page in the application, you are
only injecting one instance of each page into the pool. All you buy is
a faster response for the first access. Subsequent, concurrent, access
of any page
Short answer is you can't. The namespaces are created by parsing
.application or .library files. Except for Framework.library - which
is a special case, every library must be declared in a "parent"
namespace specification file as that's the mechanism Tapestry has to
"discover" nested namespaces.
switching the template requires an Asset with the name '$template'.
Dunno how that's done with annotations though.
Geoff
On 5/28/06, Paul Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I expected that adding this annotation would allow me to name the
template "Foo.xml" instead of "Foo.html":
@Meta("
:-P
There seems to be an issue in 3.2.14 - I would recommend using 3.2.13
instead until I get a chance to look at it.
Pls check the existing bug about 3.2.14 at sf and add a comment/attach
your log file.
thx.
G
On 5/24/06, Francis Amanfo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Dan,
Don't expect a qui
I got capture working
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit/browse_frm/thread/3e4954b5cc5f3492/8197b5a553276701#8197b5a553276701
this is what I believe to be the first step to integrating GWT widgets
into Tapestry forms.
Now... back to Spindle 4T4!
Geoff
On 5/23/06, Geoff Longman
; If there was just one more day in the week, and I could have it all to
> myself. :)
>
> Like I said, it looks really interesting, I'll need to find time to really
> dig into it.
>
> On 5/23/06, Geoff Longman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
4. It doesn't lend itself to the separation of concerns between UI design
and webapp development.
In its current form yes, and no. The widgetry created in code - yes.
Where individual chunks of widgetry are located on a page - no. A page
can be all GWT or just a few bits of it quite easily. An
Go try it out and then comment.
Geoff
On 5/23/06, Alex Kartashev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Paul Cantrell wrote:
> I completely agree with about 90% of what Todd writes. This is
> definitely not a flash in the pan, and the idea of using an
> intermediate language (Java, in this case) that comp
I used to be a proponent of Applets but there are so many known
problems (just read the preceding messages) and so little done about
it for so long that I have given up on them. Maybe some day all the
issue will be fixed - don't hold your breath.
Flash.. yuck. The idea is nice the authoring tools
You can set the 'method' attribute on the Form to GET and see it in the browser.
Geoff
On 5/20/06, Tian-Jian Barabbas [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear all,
It's me, again. Now I'm curious about what is the explicit HTTP GET URL
of tapestry form interaction. That is, I have a s
I will be posting the code. Probably on Monday. Right now I'm working
on Spindle 4T4 ;-)
Geoff
On 5/20/06, Mário Lopes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Seems really cool Geoff.
Could you post the source code to take a look?
-- Mário
On 5/21/06, Geoff Longman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
I has some luck with GWT last night duplicating the Tacos autocompleter.
here's a movie of it...
http://spindle.sourceforge.net/AutoCompleterDemo.htm
Geoff
On 5/19/06, Geoff Longman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Very sweet. If this had existed a few years ago the number of web
fr
Very sweet. If this had existed a few years ago the number of web
frameworks in java would be much less than it is today.
I finally got it running yesterday (my fault - no free time) and
lickety split I had converted some simple Tapestry stuff we have a
work here. Nothing complete mind you but fo
o/logo.png
What do you say?
-Borut
Geoff Longman pravi:
> Have a look at the Spindle logo at http://spindle.sf.net
>
> Behind the swoopy S is a version of the old T logo I like a lot -
> looks like an architectural drawing.
>
> Alas, I lost the original vector artwork for that lo
Yes you can provide the delegate. The delegate is the short circuit. I
was referring to the fact that the regular coded part of Tapestry is
not configurable.
Geoff
On 5/18/06, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Or, maybe we should be setting the "
org.apache.tapestry.specification-resolver
d be useful.
On 5/17/06, Geoff Longman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It's a convention that was decided on years before Hibernate existed.
>
> I like it the way it is. .page = a Page
>
> Geoff
>
> On 5/17/06, ZedroS Schwart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
&g
It's a convention that was decided on years before Hibernate existed.
I like it the way it is. .page = a Page
Geoff
On 5/17/06, ZedroS Schwart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We agree ;)
But there may be a good reason behind these .page. Does anyone know ?
Thanks in advance
ZedroS
On 5/16/06, Kon
Have a look at the Spindle logo at http://spindle.sf.net
Behind the swoopy S is a version of the old T logo I like a lot -
looks like an architectural drawing.
Alas, I lost the original vector artwork for that logo long ago.
Geoff
On 5/17/06, Steven Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I must say
public abstract IBinding getByteArrayBinding();
public (or private up to you) byte [] getByteArray() {
IBinding binding = getByteArrayBinding();
if (binding == null)
return null;
return (byte[])binding.getObject();
}
On 5/16/06, Geoff Longman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A byte array is an Object :-)
geoff
On 5/16/06, Mark Stang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Geoff,
T3, but custom wants an object right?
thanks,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Geoff Longman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 5/16/2006 1:19 PM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: Pas
T3?
You can always use 'custom'
Geoff
On 5/16/06, Mark Stang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All,
I am trying to pass in a byte[] into a component. However, I only seem to have
"in" available. And it seems to be null when I go looking later.
thoughts?
thanks,
Mark
--
The Spindle guy. htt
Refactor will not enable if:
1. tag has no valid jwcid attribute
2. an attribute has an unclosed quote
3. an attribute appears more than once in the tag
4. an attribute has no value (no equals + quotes).
Geoff
On 5/16/06, Joel Trunick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can't get the Refactor - move
Waimun,
You might have been unsubscribed due to bounces maybe?
The old address is still good, for now, but you must resubscribe to
the new one..
Everybody else... The web page still shows the subscribe url for the
old jakarta list.
What is the new subscribe address?
Geoff
On 5/15/06, Waimun
Robert,
The Option component expects that the selected parameter is bound to
an expression that it can read *and* write to. In other words it
expects the expression to evaluate to a bean property.
You expression works on a render (read) as it evals to a boolean and
that's ok, a value would be wh
you should add to the form:
that + . worked for us (with Jetty)
Geoff
On 5/10/06, marcopar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In data Wed, 10 May 2006 15:43:21 +0200, Andreas Idl ha scritto:
> maybe you have a wrong charset defined.
>
> AFAIK the browser posts the form encoded according to the html
Nice idea. Bad execution.
+1 to giving it the boot.
Geoff
On 5/9/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think some agreement needs to be come to about tapestryforums.com. As we
receive a ~lot~ of spam from this service every day I'm less and less
enthusiastic about its continued operat
se 3.2.x is the first stream to
support the new Intel-based Macs.
Just thought I'd point that out if you were unaware of the issue.
Thanks!
/dev/mrg
-Original Message-
From: Geoff Longman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 1:47 PM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: S
44 matches
Mail list logo
