Zedro, There is no way to change that. It's hardcoded.
Geoff On 5/18/06, ZedroS Schwart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for the info Geoff. Is it supposed to change anytime soon ? BTW, is it possible to change the config so it considers the pages in .xml or .page.xml ? It could be useful. On 5/17/06, Geoff Longman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's a convention that was decided on years before Hibernate existed. > > I like it the way it is. .page = a Page > > Geoff > > On 5/17/06, ZedroS Schwart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We agree ;) > > > > But there may be a good reason behind these .page. Does anyone know ? > > > > Thanks in advance > > ZedroS > > On 5/16/06, Konstantin Ignatyev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Yes,IMO it would be better if those files were called *.jwc.xml and > > > *.page.xml in this case IDEs would not need additional configuration > to > > > recognize the files. Hibernate uses the approach with hbm.xml and it > works > > > wery well. > > > > > > Konstantin Ignatyev > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PS: If this is a typical day on planet earth, humans will add fifteen > > > million tons of carbon to the atmosphere, destroy 115 square miles of > > > tropical rainforest, create seventy-two miles of desert, eliminate > between > > > forty to one hundred species, erode seventy-one million tons of > topsoil, add > > > 2,700 tons of CFCs to the stratosphere, and increase their population > by > > > 263,000 > > > > > > Bowers, C.A. The Culture of Denial: Why the Environmental Movement > Needs > > > a Strategy for Reforming Universities and Public Schools. New > York: State > > > University of New York Press, 1997: (4) (5) (p.206) > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > > From: ZedroS Schwart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: users@tapestry.apache.org > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 2:22:52 PM > > > Subject: Why .page and not .xml for the template ? > > > > > > Hi all > > > > > > Just a question which popped up recently in my mind : why are the > > > templates > > > pages named .page and not .xml ? > > > > > > It's not like another .xml would have annoyed anyone, is it ? On the > other > > > hand, .xml files would be automatically detected and dealed > accordingly > > > but > > > all tools, whereas .page are less well known... > > > > > > Do you have any idea on the topic ? > > > > > > Thanks in advance > > > ZedroS > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > The Spindle guy. http://spindle.sf.net > Blog: http://jroller.com/page/glongman > Other interests: http://www.squidoo.com/spaceelevator/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
-- The Spindle guy. http://spindle.sf.net Blog: http://jroller.com/page/glongman Other interests: http://www.squidoo.com/spaceelevator/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
