Hi,
About pages protected access, I think that the tapestry5-portlet module will
provide (through portal platform) implementations of much of the common
functionality that any web-based application would require: role-based
security (including authentication and authorization), user registration a
> I'm also a bit surprised at how eager people are to make use of
> cumbersome solutions like Spring Security to accomplish simple tasks
> such
> as protecting pages. The Spring Security logic is path-based,
> requiring an awkward mapping from paths to Tapestry pages. When I
> need to implement t
Hi Xuan,
Thank you for the portlet LIB. Can you explain how to use?
Marcus
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 2:09 AM, cordenier christophe
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> And what about integration of Tapestry in other framework ?
>
> From my experience view, integrating technologies in Tapestry is fun and
> fast, and the one provided by Tapestry are really good and enough to do what
> a Web
upss.. not solved
i have two pages
/test/testpage
and
/rewrited_tst/testpage
if i browse
/test/testpage
rewrite works correctly:
url looks like /test/testpage
and processed
/rewrited_tst/testpage
if i click submit button in form (name frm in page)
rewrite works not correctly:
url looks like /re
Thanks for fast reply.
You're absolutely right!
I'am not rewrite .form.
Big thanks!
On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 10:01:22 -0200
"Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo"
wrote:
Em Thu, 24 Dec 2009 09:14:10 -0200, Sergey Kashin
escreveu:
Hello.
Hi!
All works fine except submit action. Tapestry redir
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 5:41 AM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo <
thiag...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This is very clever! I guess it'll work. :) Just pay attention that the
> parameter received by the translate is a FieldTranslator, not a Translator
> itself.
>
> Thanks Thiago. I already found out the
Alfonso Quiroga wrote:
³Last, it would be good more components (ui components).²
+1 , plus it really would be nice if it comes before the above
javascript/prototype/jquery implementation/change:
³There's a plan not to switch from Prototype to jQuery. There's a plan to
have JavaScript stacks, one
I have to agree with most of the points that Piero raises, to understand T5 you
just have to delve into the code at present. Not necessarily a bad thing for
very advanced / obscure stuff, but it makes it much harder to learn Tapestry
because it's so widespread even for simple stuff. Better docs,
> Unfortunately it seems that it does not help against these error-
> bubbles.
To override the client side you'll need to read tapestry.js and follow some of
what it does. Personally I feel that the error bubbles should not be part of
the T5 core, but an optional example validation module.
I cr
Il 23/12/2009 19:48, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo ha scritto:
> Em Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:22:49 -0200, Piero Sartini
>> I don't like it as well - but tapestry should provide an alternative.
>> Maybe the question is if tapestry wants to be a full-stack framework
>> or just deliver some building block
Em Thu, 24 Dec 2009 09:14:10 -0200, Sergey Kashin escreveu:
Hello.
Hi!
All works fine except submit action. Tapestry redirect to rewrite page
except original
if submit action occurs.
Example:
rule: rewrite /test to /testRewrited
Are you rewriting /test.form to /testRewrited.form, for
Thiago, every time I see your solutions and the easyness with which you
find them I wonder how you have learned to use Tapestry.
Do you are involved in design and development of Tapestry core ? Are
you a committer that hase learned by using it?
Knowing that could really show the way to others , w
Hello.
I have create one simple rule for url rewriting.
as described in manual
http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5.1/guide/url-rewriting.html
All works fine except submit action. Tapestry redirect to
rewrite page except original
if submit action occurs.
Example:
rule: rewrite /test to /t
Em Thu, 24 Dec 2009 07:40:09 -0200, Gerald Bauer
escreveu:
I agree with you but I don't think that is the issue here. The question
was how come with Frameworks such as Wicket there is an explosion of
integrationmodules written and well documented whereas in Tapestry there
is only a
handf
Em Thu, 24 Dec 2009 01:09:03 -0200, Benny Law
escreveu:
Hi Thiago,
Hi!
I just thought of another idea and would like to bounce it off you.
Instead of subclassing AbstractTextField to create NumericField, I can
just use
TextField as is, but define a new binding prefix for the translate
Hello,
And what about integration of Tapestry in other framework ?
>From my experience view, integrating technologies in Tapestry is fun and
fast, and the one provided by Tapestry are really good and enough to do what
a Web Application should do. !but when i want to do the inverse i am facing
a p
Howard,
I agree with you but I don't think that is the issue here. The question was
how come with Frameworks such as Wicket there is an explosion of integration
modules written and well documented whereas in Tapestry there is only a
handful. Is this because Tapestry is too complex for achieving su
18 matches
Mail list logo
