Well, a simple implementation here may be like:
public class Decorate {
@Parameter(required = true)
private Object by;
@Inject
private ComponentResources componentResources;
@Inject
private Environment environment;
Object beginRender()
{
environme
Hi Kalle
yes - the chenille kit fckeditor worked perfectly well for me.
cheers
SPA
2009/6/9 Kalle Korhonen
> I can verify that chenillekit's editor works great and is fully
> customizable using FCKEditor api.
>
> Kalle
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 1:23 AM, Otho wrote:
> > This is outdated I w
I can verify that chenillekit's editor works great and is fully
customizable using FCKEditor api.
Kalle
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 1:23 AM, Otho wrote:
> This is outdated I would assume.
>
> Try the chenillekit editor, which is also based on fckeditor.
>
> 2009/6/5 spaway
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I am
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Onno Scheffers wrote:
> Well, that's all a skin is required to do... change the appearance, not the
> behavior.
Nice to know I'm not the only one using this definition of skin. :)
> You just have to make sure you don't use any images in your HTML. Use CSS
> for th
>
> But with this technique you replace only the stylesheets,
> it is not possible in T5 to replace the generated HTML from skin to skin
> like in Wordpress because the TML and the Java-class are strongly wired
> together, or?
Well, that's all a skin is required to do... change the appearance, n
maybe this can help you
http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry/Tapestry5AndJavaScriptExplained
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Alfie
Kirkpatrick wrote:
> Hi, would like to write a mixin (or even a subclass) that allows me to
> throw up a confirm div/message box when the user clicks the link before
> s
Hi, would like to write a mixin (or even a subclass) that allows me to
throw up a confirm div/message box when the user clicks the link before
submitting the form. Basically an 'are you sure?' message.
Is this possible? Looking at the LinkSubmit source it is not obvious to
me how to do it...
I usually use Spring Security. No need to maintain a sessionstate object
myself then.:) But if Neo Anderson really insists of writing his own auth
system it could be handy indeed.
2009/6/9 Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Otho wrote:
> > Or did I get you totally wr
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 8:42 AM, Christian
Senk wrote:
> But with this technique you replace only the stylesheets,
> it is not possible in T5 to replace the generated HTML from skin to skin
IMHO, if you replace the generated HTML, it's not a skin, it's
something else, as you're changing functionali
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Otho wrote:
> Or did I get you totally wrong?
You did totally right. Maybe you would also store user information in
the session for later user. ;)
--
Thiago
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubs
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 7:11 AM, Neo
Anderson wrote:
> What I want to do is to perform authentication function; but would like auth
> logic to be separated from Page file. So the auth function can be reused
> next time if other front end client needs it.
> Then I searched on the tapestry website an
If you want to allow that much control - you are likely relegated to JSPs.
-Luther
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Christian Senk <
senk.christ...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> But with this technique you replace only the stylesheets,
> it is not possible in T5 to replace the generated HTML from sk
That seems a very complicated way to do it.
public interface AuthService()
{
public boolean authenticate(User user);
}
publlic class AuthServiceImpl()
{
public boolean authenticate (User user)
{
// authenticate and return true on success
}
}
In your appmodule
binder.bind(AuthService.
But with this technique you replace only the stylesheets,
it is not possible in T5 to replace the generated HTML from skin to skin
like in Wordpress because the TML and the Java-class are strongly wired
together, or?
This would be really great ^.^
Greetings, Christian
Onno Scheffers schrieb:
What I want to do is to perform authentication function; but would like auth
logic to be separated from Page file. So the auth function can be reused
next time if other front end client needs it.
Then I searched on the tapestry website and found that seemingly it is
achieved by using Dispatcher
2009/6/9 Onno Scheffers
>
> I'm currently cleaning up the stylesheets throughout our application and
> replacing whatever I can with styles from jQuery UI CSS Framework (
> http://jqueryui.com/docs/Theming/API). This means it gets much easier for
> non-techies to create custom skins with the Them
Ok, thank you Robert!
Let me rephrase/ summarize that using the @DisplayForEdit approach you
kindly offered.
Step 1: Create a custom annotation @DisplayForEdit for properties
without setter that should be displayed when editing is used in
BeanEdit/Form.
Step 2: Then a decorator would imple
Yeah,man ,this problem was caused because you hadn't add a event type for
this button.
THe default event type is "action" ,which means that your event handler
could be equal to following:
@OnEvent(value="action" component="submitButton")
But things are a little different on Submit . The default e
> Skinning means you drop in a skin to some folder and everything changes
> automatically. With the layout component you have to manually adjust it.
> Core support means, that there is a core mechanism to find skins
> automatically and be able to change the looks at runtime for example with a
> lis
>
> Why can't we already do that with a Layout component, CSS and the
> Delegate component?
Skinning means you drop in a skin to some folder and everything changes
automatically. With the layout component you have to manually adjust it.
Core support means, that there is a core mechanism to find s
20 matches
Mail list logo
