Re: Last translator in configuration becomes default translator

So, you're suggesting that a translator named, eg, "StringTranslator" would be the default for strings, "IntegerTranslator" for integers, and so forth. It could be done. As for people relying on the current, unspecified, behavior, that's just plain wrong, because there's absolutely no guaran

Re: Loop.restoreStateFromStoredClientValue.... in 5.1.0.5

Sure... contribute a custom ValueEncoder for your data type? :) Robert On May 29, 2009, at 5/293:44 PM , Tom Zurkan wrote: ah, knew it was something like that... thank you! gotta change all my loops to use formState="literal:NONE" unless there is another way. thanks again! tom Robert Zei

Re: Staying in secure or non-secure mode rather than autoswitching based on @secure

Ryan, You may want to vote for: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-167 Jonathan On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 11:32 PM, kartweel wrote: > > Hi, > > I basically want to switch off tapestry's auto switching between secure and > non-secure and keep it in the same "mode" as the current request

Re: T 5.1 How to inject Spring beans by name?

Otho, Just in case you are still looking for a solution... Change how you declare your beans. For example: PROPAGATION_REQUIRED,readOnly PROPAGATION_REQUIRED,readOnly PROPAGATION_REQUIRED

Re: @CommitAfter rollback propagation

I was thinking about something similar to what spring has to offer. So yes, i think it should be in Tapestry IoC. Personally, one of the only things i miss from Spring is its transactional support. On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo < thiag...@gmail.com> wrote: > Em

Re: @CommitAfter rollback propagation

Em Sat, 30 May 2009 11:02:52 -0300, Juan E. Maya escreveu: This sounds awesome Thiago. I could give u a hand if you want. Nice to know I'm not the only one wanting transaction support in Tapestry. :) However, i still think that such library should be part of the core framework. Tapes

Re: @CommitAfter rollback propagation

This sounds awesome Thiago. I could give u a hand if you want. However, i still think that such library should be part of the core framework. On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo < thiag...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 6:12 AM, Juan E. Maya wrote: > > hmm

Re: tapestry-spring-security update

I can confirm it works under the Tapestry 5.2.0-SNAPSHOT Thanks a lot !!! On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Michael Gerzabek wrote: > Hi Thiago, > > yes it should. Anyway more feedback is wanted. > > Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo schrieb: > > On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Robin Helgelin wrote

Re: tapestry-spring-security update

Hi Thiago, yes it should. Anyway more feedback is wanted. Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo schrieb: On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Robin Helgelin wrote: Hi, Hi! I've just uploaded a 2.1.0-SNAPSHOT release of tapestry-spring-security with support for Tapestry 5.1. We're releasin