I was thinking about something similar to what spring has to offer. So yes, i think it should be in Tapestry IoC. Personally, one of the only things i miss from Spring is its transactional support.
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo < thiag...@gmail.com> wrote: > Em Sat, 30 May 2009 11:02:52 -0300, Juan E. Maya <maya.j...@gmail.com> > escreveu: > > This sounds awesome Thiago. I could give u a hand if you want. >> > > Nice to know I'm not the only one wanting transaction support in Tapestry. > :) > > However, i still think that such library should be part of the core >> framework. >> > > Tapestry, the Web framework? If Tapestry-IoC has transaction management > support, Tapestry the web framework has it indirectly. Of course, we could > add support for annotations in page/component/mixin methods, but I think it > is not a good idea (transactions don't belong in the vision layer). > > -- > Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo > Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor > http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > >
