Favorite tapestry features, in no particular order:
* ioc-module-autoloading
* mixins
* rendering to a DOM (very powerful; all sorts of things you can do
with this)
* @Property (great for pages; really cleans them up)
* ComponentEvents, with custom events
* Zone component
Robert
O
They do represent a compromise (i.e., Tapestry 4 used an Insert
component, not an entirely new construct), but a valuable one.
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Ben Acker wrote:
> I know it's simple, but I ${heart} expansions. Seriously, I don't know how
> I lived without them.
>
>
> On Apr 24,
I know it's simple, but I ${heart} expansions. Seriously, I don't
know how I lived without them.
On Apr 24, 2009, at 10:35 AM, Igor Drobiazko wrote:
One of the most important things for me is that using Tapestry I can
override or replace every piece of the framework.
This fact makes Tapestr
A single text field still triggers the exception.
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 1:34 AM, zack1403 wrote:
>
>> Is there something with the setup that I am doing wrong?
>
> Try using a TextField directly, without using BeanEditor and tell us
> what happens.
>
One of the most important things for me is that using Tapestry I can
override or replace every piece of the framework.
This fact makes Tapestry the most powerful Java web framework. After working
with Tapestry for a while you will recognize that JavaServer Faces
technology (for example) is a bloate
Hi!
Howard has marked the issue as closed, but i was able to reproduce it in
5.1.0.3.
I have attached some files that could be used for reproduction:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-389
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-389
Anton
Henry Chen wrote:
>
> I just created one.
I like the amount of predictable magic the framework does. Thats what
enables you writing much less code compared to others. You write the parts
of your web-app that differ from the "common case" and T5 clues them
together working app with some best-practices implemented for free.
Howard calls this
For me, Tapestry IoC, TypeCoercer, Component based and Event Bubbling, Easy to
add new component
- Original Message -
From: "Howard Lewis Ship"
To: "Tapestry users"
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 11:36 PM
Subject: Re: Web framework evaluation - What is beautiful in Tapestry?
>I have a
I have a number of things I find beautiful in Tapestry ... but I'm
waiting to see how the rest of the community responds, first.
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 3:04 AM, Peter Stavrinides
wrote:
> +1 for Tapestry IoC, which is without a doubt a masterfully written piece of
> software, IoC is of course n
Having just updated our app to use T5.1.0.4, I checked out the changes made for
TAP5-624 to support javascript callbacks on a zone update. I'm a bit surprised
at the solution for this which is to fire a client side event. I thought that
it would have used the JSON object returned for partial pag
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 1:34 AM, zack1403 wrote:
> Is there something with the setup that I am doing wrong?
Try using a TextField directly, without using BeanEditor and tell us
what happens.
--
Thiago
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 1:49 AM, daniel joyce wrote:
> So does that mean on pages using a border component, I need to add a
> dummy html/head/body tag as well, along with a DOCTYPE? Even though it
> gets thrown away and subbed with the border's parts.
Just the doctype is needed, I guess. This is
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 5:24 AM, Massimo Lusetti wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 2:13 AM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
> wrote:
>
>> By the way, why Chenillekit has this name? Just curious. :)
>
> Well it has gone through a lot of discussion ... but here it is.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
Hi, I am staring at an error in my log:
11:02:22.617 [main] ERROR o.a.t.i.s.T.RegistryStartup - An exception
occurred during startup: java.lang.NullPointerException
While this is undoubtedly the result of some very poor code on my part,
the log doesn't really help me locate it!
Is there
+1 for Tapestry IoC, which is without a doubt a masterfully written piece of
software, IoC is of course not unique to Tapestry, but the intuitiveness of the
container, the ease of configuration, and the freedom from XML are surely worth
a mention.
- Original Message -
From: "Thiago H. d
> > Hiya,
> >
> > The Tapestry js object has debug, warn and error logging methods to
> > BlackBird but no info logging. Is this due to design because the
> > logging methods are only supposed to be used by Tapestry internal
> > components (and hence not yet required)? Or maybe an wee oversight?
>
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Sven Homburg wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> sorry for let you waiting for the chennille kit working with tap5.1,
> but there is many private trouble around me.
>
> i hope that i have more time in the next 2 weeks to merge the
> 1.0 branch of chennille kit with the trunk l
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 2:13 AM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
wrote:
> By the way, why Chenillekit has this name? Just curious. :)
Well it has gone through a lot of discussion ... but here it is.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tapestry =>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chenille_fabric
Any commen
18 matches
Mail list logo
