AW: AW: T5 Reasons for Using Tapestry / Comparison

2008-03-19 Thread Martin Kersten
>>> Tapestry And GWT (Google Web Toolkit) >>> >> >> Tapestry and GWT may be compared but it's a kind of different breed. >> Integrating GWT in Tapestry works well and is a kind of quick use. >> >Well, so it worths to say that, explaining why they are different breed, and >that they may

Re: How to override a service create with @Marker

2008-03-19 Thread Robin Helgelin
Any help on this? Howard? On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Robin Helgelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > This is my SaltSource service from tapestry5-acegi package. > > @Marker(AcegiServices.class) > public static SaltSource buildSaltSource(@Inject > @Value("${acegi.password.salt}

Client side validation and IE

2008-03-19 Thread Dmitry S
Hi, I tried T5 (5.0.11) client side validation in Internet Explorer, and it seems that it not works in IE6 (I see POST in jetty log) and IE7 brings up an ugly Error popup window "Object does not support property or method" -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Client-side-valid

JSONObject problem and Autocomplete

2008-03-19 Thread Julian Wood
I was just extending Autocomplete, and I wanted to add a callback to the config, so I override the config: protected void configure(JSONObject config) { config.put("callback", "myMethod"); } and in my javascript I have: function myMethod(element, entry) { console.info(elem

Re: AW: Component event handlers

2008-03-19 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
It's not a hash code, its a unique id. Because Tapestry is having to render the page piecemeil, across a series of Ajax requests, it can't know what ids are already taken when it is trying to generate unique DOM ids for elements, therefore, an Ajax request gets a namespace: this timestamp as a hex

Re: T5: t:id

2008-03-19 Thread Chris Lewis
Thanks Howard, that is in fact what I was after. Howard Lewis Ship wrote: > t:id is used to set the Tapestry ID for the form; the client id is > derived from the Tapestry ID. The Tapestry ID must be a fixed value. > > After the Form renders, you can access its clientId propety to > determine the

Re: Tapestry Modules - Extensions

2008-03-19 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
I would factor out the shared interfaces into a library-core that could be inheritted by the app-core and by the add-on projects. At runtime, T5 IoC will be able to knit together everything. On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 2:41 PM, raulmt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I have a core app and oth

Re: EventLink strange behaviour (bug ?)

2008-03-19 Thread José Paumard
Nope, WinXP Pro and D: is NTFS. Yunhua Sang a écrit : Are you using Vista and the D:\ is FAT32? I saw strange behaviors on this combination some times ago. On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 4:45 PM, José Paumard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all, Let's take the simple following case :

Tapestry Modules - Extensions

2008-03-19 Thread raulmt
Hi, I have a core app and others projects (say project1 to projectN) that add functionality to this core (they are kind of extensions). The core app is packaged as a war and project1 to N as jars. The problem I have is that the core app doesn't have any dependency by code to the others projects

T5 Rendering a column as text box in a grid when the columnName is dynamic

2008-03-19 Thread rajeshjohnv
Hello, I have a T5 Grid which can have dynamic number of columns. I am using the model to add/delete the columns. I can get it to work perfect if it is a text field. I actually want some of those columns to be a text box. Since the columns are generated dynamically, i am not able to specify the

Re: T5: Page w/ activation context needs property set

2008-03-19 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
You can do some tricky things, such as have more than on activate method, using different numbers of parameters. The activate event handler methods are called in order of parameter count, largest number to fewest. It's really hard to discuss in the abstract. If the value can be coerced back and

Re: T5: t:id

2008-03-19 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
t:id is used to set the Tapestry ID for the form; the client id is derived from the Tapestry ID. The Tapestry ID must be a fixed value. After the Form renders, you can access its clientId propety to determine the client ID that was allocated for it. Often this is used when generating client-side

T5: t:id

2008-03-19 Thread Chris Lewis
Hello all, I'm writing a component that will embed a form in it's template. This form will serve to hold a text and submit control, but the submission will be hi-jacked by my own ajax call. As such, the page will not refresh but merely have some pieces updated. In my template i'm trying to provide

Re: EventLink strange behaviour (bug ?)

2008-03-19 Thread Yunhua Sang
Are you using Vista and the D:\ is FAT32? I saw strange behaviors on this combination some times ago. On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 4:45 PM, José Paumard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Let's take the simple following case : > > Start.tml : > > refresh > > > Menu.tml : > refresh > > Start.ja

EventLink strange behaviour (bug ?)

2008-03-19 Thread José Paumard
Hi all, Let's take the simple following case : Start.tml : refresh Menu.tml : refresh Start.java :     @OnEvent(value="refresh")     Class refresh() {         return Start.class ;     } Menu.java :     @OnEvent(value="refresh")     Class refresh() {         return Start.class ;    

Re: T5: Page w/ activation context needs property set

2008-03-19 Thread Bill Holloway
I'll try this, but the property I need to set is not a simple string at all. Bill On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 5:52 AM, Filip S. Adamsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You can set your property and then call onActivate(...) on an instance > of the page injected via @InjectPage and then return that. If

[T5] Detailed error report page disappeared

2008-03-19 Thread Dragan Djuric
HI, Today I got back to a project that I haven't touched for a couple of months and noticed that Tapestry error page that is displayed is totally short. Sometimes it displays only the heading and sometimes a heading and the first paragraph. I am pretty sure that this problem existed before in thi

Re: [T5] Detailed error report page disappeared

2008-03-19 Thread Chris Poulsen
Hi, Perhaps this one should go into a FAQ/tutorial/cookbook somewhere? I think it would be a great help for people new to the framework. -- Chris Robert Zeigler wrote: Check on the value of the "production mode" symbol? Detailed exception reports are disabled in production mode. New apps cre

RE: [T5] Detailed error report page disappeared

2008-03-19 Thread Jonathan Barker
Check out the tapestry.production-mode parameter on: http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5/tapestry-core/guide/conf.html > -Original Message- > From: Dragan Djuric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 3:12 PM > To: users@tapestry.apache.org > Subject: [T5] Detailed

Re: [T5] Detailed error report page disappeared

2008-03-19 Thread Robert Zeigler
Check on the value of the "production mode" symbol? Detailed exception reports are disabled in production mode. New apps created with the archetype default to disabling production mode (if I remember correctly). You could try adding: -Dtapestry.production-mode=false to your runtime configuratio

[T5] Detailed error report page disappeared

2008-03-19 Thread Dragan Djuric
HI, Today I got back to a project that I haven't touched for a couple of months and noticed that Tapestry error page that is displayed is totally short. Sometimes it displays only the heading and sometimes a heading and the first paragraph. I am pretty sure that this problem existed before in this

Re: AW: Component event handlers

2008-03-19 Thread José Paumard
It is indeed an Ajax request, the t:zone XML attribute is there, so there is no problem with that. >From what I see, T5 sometimes maps a TML as (seen by inspecting the DOM) or as And in the 1st case, clicking on the link refresh the page, with an error message. When I try to narrow

Re: T5: HibernateSessionManager

2008-03-19 Thread Julian Wood
Given your recommendation that using HibernateSessionManager in unit tests is not appropriate, and Howard's little hint about constructor- based injection, I was able to come up with an acceptable strategy, whereby I create the sessionfactory and the session for my unit tests, and pass that

Re: AW: T5 Reasons for Using Tapestry / Comparison

2008-03-19 Thread Francois Armand
Martin Kersten wrote: Tapestry And GWT (Google Web Toolkit) Tapestry and GWT may be compared but it's a kind of different breed. Integrating GWT in Tapestry works well and is a kind of quick use. Well, so it worths to say that, explaining why they are different breed, and that they ma

Re: AW: Component event handlers

2008-03-19 Thread Ted Steen
The error you get is probably due to the fact that it is not an ajax request. you can only return blocks from event methods when making ajax requests. you have to make the request with Ajax.request(...) or by using tapestry default ajax mechanism. (...) hope it helps! 2008/3/19, Martin Kersten <

[T5] React on DatePicker's onchange event

2008-03-19 Thread Jens Pfau
Hi, can anyone tell me how I can observe the onchange event of a DatePicker wrapped by Tapestry's DateField? Jens -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-T5--React-on-DatePicker%27s-onchange-event-tp16147372p16147372.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Na

AW: AW: Component event handlers

2008-03-19 Thread Martin Kersten
I see. When I read the AJAX documentation correctly your code snippet should be on the save side. Sorry but I can't see anything wrong. Cheers, Martin (Kersten) Von: José Paumard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 19. März 2008 17:33 An: Tapestr

Re: T5 Reasons for Using Tapestry / Comparison

2008-03-19 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
In case I wasn't clear, I was referring to the "traditional" binary downloads; they now include the Tapestry JARs, 3rd party JARs, and source JARs (for the Tapestry code). On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Howard Lewis Ship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is especially true for 5.0.11, where the

Re: T5 Reasons for Using Tapestry / Comparison

2008-03-19 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
This is especially true for 5.0.11, where the dependencies of tapestry-ioc and tapestry-core are bundled with those libraries. so you can be up and running from the binary download very quickly (still, the Maven support for setting up the project template is very nice). On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 9:

Re: AW: Component event handlers

2008-03-19 Thread José Paumard
Code snippets are very basic : In the tml : click me someBlock">     In the class :     @Inject     private Block someBlock ;     @OnEvent(value="someEvent")     Block clickMe() {         return someBlock ;     } What I would expect is to see the content of the block in the div "som

Re: T5 Reasons for Using Tapestry / Comparison

2008-03-19 Thread Daniel Jue
Thanks for the input, I will change that item. I should have been more careful in my wording. What I meant by "used" and "not specifically required" is that many T5 tutorials use Maven to get you started (archetypes, screencasts, articles, appfuse), but that you are not required to use Maven at al

AW: Component event handlers

2008-03-19 Thread Martin Kersten
Sounds like onActivate? What do you try to do? Can you give us the exact case (event type). Code Snippet? Von: José Paumard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 19. März 2008 17:18 An: Tapestry users Betreff: Re: Component event handlers Hello Chris,

Re: Component event handlers

2008-03-19 Thread José Paumard
Hello Chris, Thank you for your fast answer. It is Block (not BlockImpl, this class is in the internals of T5, so using it is not recommended). I switched to Object, but it didnt change anything. Here is the exact error message : A component event handler method returned the value [EMAIL

Re: Component event handlers

2008-03-19 Thread Davor Hrg
too little information... some events support return value, some don't... tell more on exact case Davor Hrg On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 5:12 PM, José Paumard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Everytime I try to return an injected block in an event handler method, I > get an error me

Re: Component event handlers

2008-03-19 Thread Chris Lewis
What is the declared return type of your method? It should be Object, and not BlockImpl. José Paumard wrote: > Hi all, > > Everytime I try to return an injected block in an event handler > method, I get an error message, telling me that BlockImpl is not a > valid returned value. From the nightly g

Component event handlers

2008-03-19 Thread José Paumard
Hi all, Everytime I try to return an injected block in an event handler method, I get an error message, telling me that BlockImpl is not a valid returned value. From the nightly generated docs, this is supposed to work. Has anyone experienced this too ? Thank you, José --

AW: T5 Reasons for Using Tapestry / Comparison

2008-03-19 Thread Martin Kersten
>Tapestry And GWT (Google Web Toolkit) Tapestry and GWT may be compared but it's a kind of different breed. Integrating GWT in Tapestry works well and is a kind of quick use. I plan to contribute such easy integration with a quick tutorial to integrate several GWT components into tapestry pages (

AW: T5 Reasons for Using Tapestry / Comparison

2008-03-19 Thread Martin Kersten
Tapestry works well without Maven. You dont need it. Just drop all required libraries into the lib-path and you are done. Also I would like to add that developing using tomcat also works well. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Daniel Jue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 19. Mär

Re: T5 Reasons for Using Tapestry / Comparison

2008-03-19 Thread Adam Zimowski
A little feedback: >When not to use Tapestry >If you are not allowed to use Maven. (Currently used by T5 for gathering library dependencies, although not specifically required) This is simply not true. It is possible to use Tap 5 without Maven at all. In fact, I'm running a major intranet applica

Re: [T5] java.io.IOException while using prototype with T5Components and Jetty

2008-03-19 Thread Tobias Wehrum
Hi everyone, just to inform everyone who has the same problem: Removing Sitemesh has done the job for me. There is still a exception each time I make an AJAX call (from Jetty, I think), but the "SyntaxError: unterminated string literal" is gone and it's working like a charm. Regards, Tobias

T5 Reasons for Using Tapestry / Comparison

2008-03-19 Thread Daniel Jue
I've made the stub page, and I've tried to keep it marketing-free and of course honest. Smart project managers are going to ask when you _would not_ want to use a particular framework, and potential users should be able to get that kind of information from us easily. Those of you with experience

Re: T5: Official Tutorial still Incomplete

2008-03-19 Thread nicholas Krul
Heh... I'd recommend Tapestry 5: Building Web Applications nice tricks on how to cut maven out of the loop (if, like me, you don't like it). I used it to get started. T5 was at 5.10, and other than having to use a different maven command (via the mailing list), Its all smooth sailing. Other than

Re: [T5] Adding form fields on the fly

2008-03-19 Thread Kristian Marinkovic
you can add new form fields on the client-side using javascript on the server-side you then have to parse/obtain/process the data manually from the Request service you can inject almost everywhere. you'll have to think about a smart way to name the form fields so you can find them in the Request.

Re: [T5] Adding form fields on the fly

2008-03-19 Thread Jens Pfau
Nobody has an idea? Jens Pfau wrote: > > Hello, > > I would like to have a table with form fields where each row stands for > the > values of one data set. Furthermore, I would like to allow the user to add > new rows on the fly, preferably using client-side actions without > reloading > the e

Re: Make Tapestry a "full" web framework?

2008-03-19 Thread Hugo Palma
Have you given http://www.jsecurity.org a look ? I would be cool if a tapestry-jsecurity module existed, as an alternative for acegi and other Spring based security solutions. Joshua Jackson wrote: > > No worries. I am integrating T5 with Spring Security 2. But I'm not > comfortable with it. I am

Re: OnValidate and OnSuccess

2008-03-19 Thread Martin Kersten
Praise Tapestry! I guessed the solution just by intuition. To retrieve the new value you just need to introduce a parameter. Field validation is done before setting actual properties. I read the documentation but I missed the parameter of onValidate. http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry5/tapestry-

Blocks & Delegate : properties collisions

2008-03-19 Thread José Paumard
Hi all, I came across a strange behavior. I'm not sure it's a bug, since from the docs I fully understand why I get this error, but still, I have the feeling that something could be done here. Suppose we have a classical login / register zone, with a tml that looks like that :        

AW: AW: OnValidate and OnSuccess

2008-03-19 Thread Martin Kersten
I allready use it and it is not set. Give you an idea: Page { private String item = "default"; onSuccessFromItemForm() { print(item) -> "item"; } onValidateFromItem() throws ValidationException { print(item) -> "default"; } } You see. I would have expected that o

Re: Make Tapestry a "full" web framework?

2008-03-19 Thread Joshua Jackson
On 3/19/08, Christian Edward Gruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fair enough. I'm convinced. Sorry for the false positive, Joshua. > > Cheers, > Christian. No worries. I am integrating T5 with Spring Security 2. But I'm not comfortable with it. I am looking for the best for T5 to have security.

AW: Tapestry at my company

2008-03-19 Thread Stroeber, Andreas
Hi, Why not just simply add a page to the Tapestry homepage with arguments for/against tapestry? Everyone who really is interested in informations and differences between * and Tapestry could have a look at and anyone who wants to ignore 'trolls' can do so and/or send the url. Even a link-list

Re: Make Tapestry a "full" web framework?

2008-03-19 Thread Christian Edward Gruber
Fair enough. I'm convinced. Sorry for the false positive, Joshua. Cheers, Christian. On 19-Mar-08, at 06:50 , Filip S. Adamsen wrote: Joshua is not a troll. Besides, he didn't mention Wicket. -Filip On 2008-03-19 07:46, Christian Edward Gruber wrote: I love it when someone invents new peo

Re: AW: OnValidate and OnSuccess

2008-03-19 Thread Olivier Jacquet
Yes, I know. And if you use onValidateFromNewItem (with newItem the id of the field, not the form) you will see that the value of the property is set. Or are you already using the id from the field? Regards, Olivier On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:47:37 +0100, "Martin Kersten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot

AW: OnValidate and OnSuccess

2008-03-19 Thread Martin Kersten
Hi Oivier, I actually use onValidateFromComponent. The problem is that the property in question was not set to the field value to check. Cheers, Martin (Kersten) -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Olivier Jacquet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 19. März 2008 12:47 An: Tap

Re: Make Tapestry a "full" web framework?

2008-03-19 Thread Daniel Jue
I like that the security aspect of T5 is open for me to implement. Choices for this kind of thing is good. Imagine you are mandated to use some other existing framework. Code reuse is good. Do we really want to find people to write a Netegrity Siteminder plugin for a custom security framework? I

Re: OnValidate and OnSuccess

2008-03-19 Thread Olivier Jacquet
Hi, I ran into this issue as well. onValidate() is actually called multiple times. Try it with onValidateFromNewItem(). I can't check if that's how I solved it here. Regards, Olivier On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 11:39:55 +0100, "Martin Kersten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Having a simple form cont

Re: T5: Official Tutorial still Incomplete

2008-03-19 Thread Olivier Jacquet
Hi, You can always have a look at the wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry/Tapestry5HowTos And if you're as new as me the book http://tapestry.apache.org/articles.html actually helped quite a bit but it might already be somewhat outdated (was written for 5.0.6 or something). You can always as

[OT] Dubai

2008-03-19 Thread Andreas Andreou
Hi, i'll be in Dubai for the next 6 days, so, if any Tapestry fan (that resides there) wants to meet, just send me a private email Have fun list! -- Andreas Andreou - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://blog.andyhot.gr Tapestry / Tacos developer Open Source / JEE Consulting -

Re: T5: Page w/ activation context needs property set

2008-03-19 Thread Filip S. Adamsen
You can set your property and then call onActivate(...) on an instance of the page injected via @InjectPage and then return that. If your onPassivate method returns the correct activation context I think it'll work. The property will have to be persistent, of course. -Filip On 2008-03-19 11:0

Re: Make Tapestry a "full" web framework?

2008-03-19 Thread Filip S. Adamsen
Joshua is not a troll. Besides, he didn't mention Wicket. -Filip On 2008-03-19 07:46, Christian Edward Gruber wrote: I love it when someone invents new people to stage internet conversations. note the "just only" and other little language features that this troll uses in all his posts, regar

Re: AW: @Cached and caching in general

2008-03-19 Thread Davor Hrg
I mean exactly that, I'm comfortable with my html code, css and js I can inline what I need, I'm not proposing this as a general approach, but I like doing just that: take part of rendered content and do something with it. if something is a compoenent framework, a component should be independant,

Re: AW: @Cached and caching in general

2008-03-19 Thread Andreas Andreou
Well, i believe if someone is aware of these issues, there's nothing wrong with using this solution - I've had some cases where data access is fast but data processing (in order to present) was quite complex, so this really helped. For reference, another not-yet-mentioned problem of this kind of c

OnValidate and OnSuccess

2008-03-19 Thread Martin Kersten
Having a simple form containing a simple field (TextField) I have problems validating its content. The validation is done using onValidate. The Form is processed using onSuccess. The problem arises that onValidate is invoked *before* the property is updated with the value to validate. D

Stack trace on click on a EvenLink link

2008-03-19 Thread José Paumard
Hi all, I came across this stack trace while clicking on a EvenLink link with a zone attribute. Can anyone tell me if it's a known issue or not ? If it's not I'll try to isolate a simple use case to contribute it. Thank you, José WARN - EXCEPTION java.io.IOException: Syntaxe du nom de f

Re: T5: Page w/ activation context needs property set

2008-03-19 Thread Adam Zimowski
I was on the same boat just the other day. I ended up moving that property to the context and it worked fine for me. On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 12:51 AM, Bill Holloway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have an actionlink method to redirect to a page that has an > activation context but that also needs

AW: AW: @Cached and caching in general

2008-03-19 Thread Martin Kersten
> ...this king of component is useful for capturing output so it can be sent > via email for example. This does not sound like a good idea. Do you mean requesting a page and cut it out or grabbing part of the DOM during same request. Just wondering... . -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Da

Re: AW: @Cached and caching in general

2008-03-19 Thread Davor Hrg
I agree that this is not something to take on lightly, and data should be cached, and rendering left as is. but besides caching this king of component is useful for capturing output so it can be sent via email for example. I like to keep most things stateless (only dependant on parameters), so fro

Re: T5: Examples for Cayenne integration?

2008-03-19 Thread Robert Zeigler
A little late, and a little less than promised. Rudimentary code is available at: http://code.google.com/p/tapestry5-cayenne/ Note that the code there is based on working application code, but the actual code is currently untested. Maybe I will have a bit of time this weekend to hack on this som

T5: Official Tutorial still Incomplete

2008-03-19 Thread Martin Kersten
I just needed a custom validator tutorial and found the offical tutorial of Tapestry 5. Saidly it is still incomplete. Are there any plans to complete it? It doesn't look very promising if the official tutorial is out of order. (Also I would appreciate the additional informations.) Cheers, Mar

Re: Make Tapestry a "full" web framework?

2008-03-19 Thread Ivan Dubrov
Robin Helgelin wrote: The bad thing about tapestry-acegi is that it is not very flexible, though. Recently I was trying to apply tapestry-acegi for CAS authentication (http://www.ja-sig.org/products/cas/) and found that I had to rewrite almost every line of its module class, which unfortunately

Re: Make Tapestry a "full" web framework?

2008-03-19 Thread Robin Helgelin
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Ivan Dubrov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What's the reason to make it NOT depend on Spring? tapestry-acegi does NOT > uses Spring IoC container, it uses T5 IoC for configuring the services, but > it does use some Spring utility classes, which is in my opinion jus

Re: Make Tapestry a "full" web framework?

2008-03-19 Thread Christophe Franco
yuan gogo wrote: At least, if tapestry-acegi doesn't have a dependency on spring, that will be very GOOD! http://www.acegisecurity.org/standalone.html "we recommend you take a look at Spring and consider using it in your applications. Irrespective of whether you do so or not, we strongly re

Re: Make Tapestry a "full" web framework?

2008-03-19 Thread Ivan Dubrov
What’s the reason to make it NOT depend on Spring? tapestry-acegi does NOT uses Spring IoC container, it uses T5 IoC for configuring the services, but it does use some Spring utility classes, which is in my opinion just fine (it certainly increases size of the final archive, but who bothers abo

AW: Make Tapestry a "full" web framework?

2008-03-19 Thread Martin Kersten
Maybe a JSecurity option on tapestry would be a deal ;-). www.jsecurity.org I also don't like the ACEGI framework for personal reason. Cheers, Martin (Kersten) -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Chris Lewis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 19. März 2008 08:48 An: Tapestry us

Re: T5: your opinion on grid's sorting

2008-03-19 Thread Andreas Pardeike
On 18 mar 2008, at 20.35, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: I see these little extra characters as a bit of a rabbit hole=; I'd rather add yet another parameter to identify which columns should be sortable Also, in a lot of my apps, re-sorting the table should usually set the paging to page 1. I guess

Re: Make Tapestry a "full" web framework?

2008-03-19 Thread Chris Lewis
Hi Yuan, When I spent a few minutes looking at acegi I read that it can be used without Spring. Of course shortly after I read that I decided not to use it because it's documentation is circular (ie, you must first learn spring). Let me say this to you even though most know this by now - I hate ac

Re: Make Tapestry a "full" web framework?

2008-03-19 Thread yuan gogo
BTW, I hope I can contribute codes. But, unluckily, I'm not so skilled to do that for now! :-( 2008/3/19, Christian Edward Gruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I love it when someone invents new people to stage internet > conversations. > > note the "just only" and other little language features that

Re: Make Tapestry a "full" web framework?

2008-03-19 Thread yuan gogo
I don't understand u well, I think. But I'm not making FUD here if you read the mail list before. Or my English is so bad to understand u, if so, I apologize. yes, security "without configuration" is impossible, by "without configuration" I mean I hope there's something looks like "Native", if th