Fair enough. I'm convinced. Sorry for the false positive, Joshua.
Cheers,
Christian.
On 19-Mar-08, at 06:50 , Filip S. Adamsen wrote:
Joshua is not a troll.
Besides, he didn't mention Wicket.
-Filip
On 2008-03-19 07:46, Christian Edward Gruber wrote:
I love it when someone invents new people to stage internet
conversations.
note the "just only" and other little language features that this
troll uses in all his posts, regardless of the story.
Even if I'm wrong in that supposition, this is open-source
software. If this was a real request, and not just another attempt
to slander Tapestry, then this person could make concrete
recommendations, or even better, contribute code.
But mostly I love the premises. In a "real web framework" security
is "built in" and no configuration is even necessary. Bullcrap.
Every security system needs configuration, because no system can
anticipate all possible needs and use-cases and auto-configure for
that magically discovered state. And why should T5 re-build what
someone already wrote and tested. If acegi works, then why not
integrate it? Ooh, wait! I know, I know! HLS sucks because he
didn't create his own O/R Mapping layer! 'Cause why use Cayenne/
Hibernate/JPA/TopLink when you can, without compelling necessity,
write your own, untested system from scratch!
Meh.
Christian.
On 18-Mar-08, at 23:51 , Joshua Jackson wrote:
I agree. I have requested this before for Tapestry to be a full web
framework since right now it's just only a plain web framework.
On 3/19/08, yuan gogo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tapestry is good.
But I personally think it's lack of something that should be
built-in.
e.gsecurity!
It's right that tapestry can work well with acegisecurity, but
it's not
native, is it?
And we programmer need time to write the configuration,
debug ........ it's
boring!
Even there has been tapestry-acegi, but 2 projects can not be
always be
synchronous. What's more, tapestry-acegi can not do all that
acegi does.
I was asp.net user once, even I think it's not so good, but it's
good for
"rapid" development, because some functions like security is
built-in.
thanks.
--
Let's show the world what we've got.
Blog: http://joshuajava.wordpress.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
