Thank you, Hugo for the help. I was also checking the T5 documentation and
found that default (recommended) way for email validation
is roll-your-own validation based on the regular expressions that are stored
inside properties.
This is really, really innovative and unusual way to do that for me
(a
Aw, can't we please keep him? I mean, as trolls go, he's doesn't require
much upkeep.
I've come to look forward to his occasional rants for their entertainment
value. He plays the buffoon so well, and as the offers of fortunes from
Nigeria has slowed to a trickle I crave something to fill that
My praise too, to Howard and the whole tapestry team. You should be glad for
having those great open source projects, which enable you to do your work.
If you don't like it, leave it.
We are using tapestry 5 in three applications production environments, and
it works without any mayor annoyances
I'm really opposed to this. It is One More Choice to Make and that's
a bad thing. Addiing lots of options that can be enabled or disabled
is a cop out, if a feature needs to be disabled, it is likely broken.
I'm only leaving in the "optimized request" stuff so that I can prove
its not worth using
Unnecessary would be too strong.
The best bet for this kind of thing would be to add an issue
requesting this kind of logging be built into Tapestry.
There isn't a MagicWand service that stores any data about the current event.
On Feb 11, 2008 3:34 PM, Hilco Wijbenga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
On Feb 7, 2008 3:31 PM, Hilco Wijbenga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To aid debugging, is it possible to do something like this:
>
> @onEvent
> public void onEvent() {
> final String componentId = MagicWand.getComponentIdForThisEvent();
> final String action = MagicWand.getActionForThisEvent
Yeah. I just think following the friendly URLs to their logical conclusion
would dictate that the most common action would be mapped to that subroot
URL.
In this case, though, I really think just simply extending the Start class
convention to all packages would take care of the problem. You'd st
How about a flag in the app module to just turn off the friendly page
renaming altogether? Then if someone wants to have a
page structure like
report/status
report/reportstatus
report/statusreport
report/statusreport1
They can all resolve to unique pages.
For now, I'll add the contents of my ol
I agree this is a tripping point that needs addressing.
I tend to organize things a little differently, so I'd have an orders
package, with ListOrders, ViewOrders and EditOrders classes, thus:
http://localhost/orders/list
http://localhost/orders/view/101
http://localhost/orders/edit/101
On Feb
I agree that it would be nice to be able to have an "index" page/class that
can be accessed by navigating to that directory/package in the URL, while
still having nested pages/classes accessible.
I hit this list about that a while back:
http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=12846148&frame
Thanks for the suggestions! I've checked the javassist versions - I
initially had two different versions of 3.6. I think you are right that this
is more likely a javassist issue than a tapestry issue. I have a workaround
on our development machines (both linux and windows), but the resulting war
st
I don't know about the cause, though you if you are deploying inside
JBoss, you may be seeing a conflict on the version of Javassist.
The workarounds for these cases are to encapsulate the affected
instance variable inside its own (private) accessor methods. That
simplifies the method that Tapest
Hey thanks for the response ill give it a try!
"Olof =?UTF-8?Q?N=C3=A6ss=C3=A9n" ?= wrote:
>
> There is no real secret in getting one of these boxes to work with
> Tapestry 5. I've used a slightly modified version of lightbox for a
> pop up in a Tapestry 5 application and it works fine.
>
> I
On Feb 11, 2008 10:18 AM, Norman Franke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To hijack this thread, I do think Howard deserves praise!
Thanks!
>
> I've really been enjoying Tapestry 4.1, although I haven't played
> with 5 yet since I'm currently busy with some other non-web projects.
> My boss, in partic
To hijack this thread, I do think Howard deserves praise!
I've really been enjoying Tapestry 4.1, although I haven't played
with 5 yet since I'm currently busy with some other non-web projects.
My boss, in particular, was impress that tapestry could query our
database and display a web page
I ran into the same problem early on, and eventually just changed the name
of my pages. What I wanted was to be able to have a URL hierarchy like the
following:
http://localhost/orders
http://localhost/orders/view/101
http://localhost/orders/edit/101
There was no clear way to have an "index" pag
You could, but email addresses are quite easy to come by and he'd likely
just register as someone else. So, it's not even worth the effort.
--
Kevin
On 2/11/08 12:00 PM, in article
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
"Joel Wiegman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can we just remove him from the list? That's not
Hi Howard,
More information. The actual error is
"bad frame_type in StackMapTable"
and is thrown from javassist.bytecode.StackMapTable.stackMapFrames(int,int).
Not sure whether this helps, but it looks as if the stack is messed up.
There is a try {...} finally{..} in the code, and if I remove t
Can we just remove him from the list? That's not the first time he's
written a very spectacularly uninformed troll.
-Original Message-
From: Howard Lewis Ship [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 11:46 AM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: Howard deserves praise
Don't
Don't even bother to respond, just delete the message. Anything else
just tweaks the troll.
On Feb 11, 2008 8:30 AM, Davor Hrg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> TROLL !!
>
> On Feb 11, 2008 4:24 PM, Emmanuel Sowah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > Is it me, or you too have noticed an act
So, you're running the commandline version or the ant task?
In both, there is a way to define multiple javadoc urls
like the example @
http://tacos.sourceforge.net/tacos4.1/tapdoc/tapdoc/ant.html
On Feb 11, 2008 5:40 PM, Tomek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> a question again, di I understand i
TROLL !!
On Feb 11, 2008 4:24 PM, Emmanuel Sowah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Is it me, or you too have noticed an active participation of Howard in the
> answering of questions here on the list in recent
> times?
> In the past when Tapestry was popular his ego and pompous attitude ma
TROLL !!
On Feb 11, 2008 4:41 PM, Udora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Is it me, or you too have noticed an active participation of Howard in the
> answering of questions here on the list in recent
> times?
> In the past when Tapestry was popular his ego and pompous attitude made him
>
I've had very bad results with JRockit. At one client BEA had to
encourage the client to deploy with Sun's JDK owing to a memory
management issue that caused great memory thrash on load. This was a
BEA Portal app - no tapestry. It was crazy. And we validated the
problem with a sample ap
Hi guys,
Is it me, or you too have noticed an active participation of Howard in the
answering of questions here on the list in recent
times?
In the past when Tapestry was popular his ego and pompous attitude made him
feel too high to even bother to read people's request for help.
But now with the
Hi,
a question again, di I understand it correctly, that I need to write
tapestry-javadom.xml manually to get correct links to my javadoc files?
Thanks
Tomek
Tomek Sniadach schrieb:
Thanks Igor,
unfortunately I'm not using maven :( and this configuration doesn't
support code sample.
Tomek
Hi,
a question again, di I understand it correctly, that I need to write
tapestry-javadom.xml manually to get correct links to my javadoc files?
Thanks
Tomek
Tomek Sniadach schrieb:
Thanks Igor,
unfortunately I'm not using maven :( and this configuration doesn't
support code sample.
Tomek
Hi guys,
Is it me, or you too have noticed an active participation of Howard in the
answering of questions here on the list in recent
times?
In the past when Tapestry was popular his ego and pompous attitude made him
feel too high to even bother to read people's request for help.
But now with the
is all ajaxdirect component taken away since tacos 4.1.1 ? i trying to create
progress bar using 4.1.1 but fail.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I did some more research into this, and the root cause is a a BadBytecode
exception in line 213 in javassist.expr.FieldAccess in the method replace0,
where the error occurs in the insertGap method. It is attempting to insert a
gap of length 11, which looks innocuous enough. I got somewhat lost
This thread should help you:
http://www.mail-archive.com/users@tapestry.apache.org/msg20213.html
Renat Zubairov wrote:
> Hello T5 users,
> What is the default approach of handling email validation inside the
> form/beanEditForm?
>
>
>
>
Hello all Tapestry Users,
I currently working on Tapestry 5.0 with WebLogic 9.2 server.
I deployed my application on WebLogic 9.2 and configured to use JRockit's
R26.0 JDK environment
to run the application and I found that WebLogic 9.2 with JRockit R26.0
throws exception
for Tapestry Filter on
Page nur fuer den angemeldeten User erreichbar ? = page only for users they
have logged in
2008/2/11, Dapeng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> neat
>
>
>
> except there are some comments that i can't read ...
>
> =)
>
> Sven Homburg wrote:
> > i think this is they way you need:
> >
> > @InjectPage(valu
neat
except there are some comments that i can't read ...
=)
Sven Homburg wrote:
i think this is they way you need:
@InjectPage(value = "Login")
private ILoginPage _loginPage;
/**
* check for user is authentificated if requested page implements
IRestrictedPage.
*
i think this is they way you need:
@InjectPage(value = "Login")
private ILoginPage _loginPage;
/**
* check for user is authentificated if requested page implements
IRestrictedPage.
*
* @return
*/
@OnEvent(value = "activate")
Object checkPageAccessPermission
35 matches
Mail list logo
