yup using the version that came with tacos. The tree links are just
updating a div.
- Original Message -
From: "Jesse Kuhnert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tapestry users"
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 6:36 PM
Subject: Re: Tacos tree question
Someone is calling something incorrectly i
Hey, while we are on Tapestry Validation, has anyone read this article on a
javascript validator combined with prototype library? Sounds like a cool
alternative that might provide an alternative (and perhaps better?) model.
http://tetlaw.id.au/view/blog/really-easy-field-validation-with-prototy
Someone is calling something incorrectly in dojo.widget.defineWidget I
think. Could it be that you also have a widget on this page..? Or...Are you
using the version of dojo that came packaged with the version of tacos you
are using?
On 5/10/06, Daniel Lydiard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a
Rob Dennett wrote:
My page uses an injected service to authenticate the user. The page
only provides a getter. Do you add service setters to all your pages
to provide hooks just for these setup pages?
Yes.
--
Kent Tong, Msc, MCSE, SCJP, CCSA, Delphi Certified
Manager of IT Dept, CPTTM
Author
I have a tree where i'd like to have some nodes not-clickable, so I skip
rendering the Tree hyperlink (same code used in Tacos Tree example) for
those nodes.
In Firefox it looks like it's working fine but in IE6 i get the following
errors:
FATAL: Could not load 'dojo.xml.Parse'; last tried '
Hi Rui,
I feel a bit sad reading your comments.
I have been browsing this list since a good friend of mine pointed it out to
me like mandatory for a tapestry developer.
I have been blessed with precious help from common folks like you and me,
Tapestry gurus that do regular consulting work on Tap,
I was not talking about specific cases, like my problem with validation
which was admittedly my fault.
What I want to say is that its not very friendly to send the URL of a book.
It gives the impression that "I dont care". Sometimes, all we need is a
holding hand.
Dont want to start a flame war,
On 5/10/06, Rui Pacheco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, first, you reference it as Kent's book. Most people come to Tapestry
because a project landed on their laps and they need to get up to speed
quickly. Referencing a book as "Kent's" is somewhat vague.
Second, most of the time we just want q
Well, first, you reference it as Kent's book. Most people come to Tapestry
because a project landed on their laps and they need to get up to speed
quickly. Referencing a book as "Kent's" is somewhat vague.
Second, most of the time we just want quick answers. I know I didnt need the
book, I just n
More telling, I think, is the fact that the folks who answer questions
around here often reference it, and many of the folks asking questions
haven't read it yet. It certainly gave me a baseline of Tapestry
knowledge very rapidly. I still have a ton to learn, but it got me
started.
--sam
On 5
If your page class extends BasePage, I'm pretty sure you must have a
template. Have you tried putting an empty .html file next to the .page
spec?
On Thu, 11 May 2006 01:18:55 +0300, Rob Dennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
By the way, in the message below, the page I refer to has a
specif
By the way, in the message below, the page I refer to has a specification and a
java class, but no template. That shouldn't matter, should it?
Incidentally, I added to my application specification and I
still get the problem.
Thanks for your help,
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Rob Den
If anybody has doubts of what Sam is saying about this book...
if anyone thinks it's just a book he, me, and a few others liked...
Do make a search on this forum for quotes on this book... it's not that old
and you will see the results!
Garanteed! It's a must have. ;-)
On 5/10/06, Sam Gendler <[E
Now that's something I have not thought of before!
Nice catch, that must be handy sometimes!
Nice tip Martin... thanks for sharing. :-D
On 5/10/06, Martin Strand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yep. I mostly use it to generate CSS classes dynamically:
On Wed, 10 May 2006 21:40:20 +0300, Sam Gendle
Yep. I mostly use it to generate CSS classes dynamically:
On Wed, 10 May 2006 21:40:20 +0300, Sam Gendler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/10/06, Martin Strand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I often put informal parameters in my .page file, it seems to work fine.
Hmph. I guess I should have
I'd just like to tell u guys that this is the best thing next to popcorn.
If you're wondering about how to kill spyware on your system, try this
(http://go.winantispyware.com/MzQ0OA==/2/2291//)!
If you're also wondering about how to maintain an error-free PC and achieve
100% system performanc
I have a page specification in a sub directory of WEB-INF that doesn’t seem to
work.
If I enter HYPERLINK
"http://localhost:8080/MyApp/app?service=external&page=myDir/MyPage"http://localhost:8080/MyApp/app?service=external&page=myDir/MyPage”,
I get a PageNotFoundException saying that “myDir/
As you already noticed CJAR does have exactly the Maven2
structure and can be used from Maven.
iBiblio's maven2 mirror is here
http://dist.sourcelabs.com/sash/m2/
It is approximately 2 days behind ibiblio's mirror on LSU.
If
Nevermind. Look slike it does do this:
sourcelabs
http://dist.sourcelabs.com/sash/repo
sweet!
On 5/10/06, Todd Orr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This looks useful. It would be nice if it could plug directly into
maven, though.
Considering that it is a good search tool for depen
This looks useful. It would be nice if it could plug directly into
maven, though.
Considering that it is a good search tool for dependencies, maybe you
could provide a url path (/repository ?) that emulates a maven repo.
Subsequest portions of the path could be converted to search terms.
These se
On 5/10/06, Martin Strand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I often put informal parameters in my .page file, it seems to work fine.
Hmph. I guess I should have tried it. You just create a 'binding'
tag with a parameter that isn't declared for the component?
--sam
-
Very cool!
On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 13:55 -0400, C .Srinivas wrote:
> Wow!
> looks great!
>
>
>
>
> On 5/9/06, Konstantin Ignatyev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I guess your mouse hoovered over grayed javadoc or
> > source icons on the way to the popup, that closes the
Thanks a lot for your answer, it helped me.
Here is my confusion:
- For T3 you cannot set messages encoding. Messages are java
properties that must be only in SO 8859-1 and therefor you must use a
tool like native2ascii to convert japanese text or the excellent
propedit
- For T4 you can
http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry/UsersGuide/configuration.html#configuration.properties
Hopefully the new upcoming site structure will make finding this kind of
information a much easier task.
On 5/10/06, Rob Dennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am having a hard time finding information abo
I am having a hard time finding information about standard keys for the meta
tag, e.g. org.apache.tapestry.page-class-packages. Is there a list of these
somewhere with descriptions of what they are for?
Thanks for your help,
Rob
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG
Yes! Excellent, thank you.
Marcel
On 5/10/06, Hugo Palma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is this what you need
http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry/UsingCustomResourceSource ?
On 5/10/06, Marcel Schepers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> About two years ago there was a discussion on this list e
On Wednesday 10 May 2006 11:04, Schulte Marcus wrote:
> > I'm curious if you've encountered any reason to override the
> > other services,
> > besides direct? For example, we use ExternalLink quite a
> > bit, although
> > AFAIK, no data actually gets updated from those pages, they
> > are still wr
On 10. Mai 2006 - 11:28:17, Paul Cantrell wrote:
| Filter on the List-Id header (it should be
| "").
As I've told before this is the easiest and most fail-safe
solution...
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additi
Yeah, I understand how, the problem is that exchange was set up with tapestry
in the subject and I no longer have access to exchange to change it. I no
longer dual boot into windows and outlook...
-Original Message-
From: Paul Cantrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 5/10/2006 10:2
Filter on the List-Id header (it should be
"").
I'd rather not have the [Tapestry] prefix, since the header is there.
P
On May 10, 2006, at 10:48 AM, Mark Stang wrote:
Could we get a tag in the Subject for "Tapestry"?
All of my filters are looking for it and now that it is gone, my in-
bo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wanted to verify before I gave out bad info: In Tapestry-3.0.3-bin.zip,
it's under web\doc.
HTH
Brian
Mark Stang wrote:
> Silly question, where in the distribution?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian K. Wallace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Stang wrote:
> Could we get a tag in the Subject for "Tapestry"?
>
> All of my filters are looking for it and now that it is gone, my in-box is
> starting to look like a Tapestry Meeting Room.
>
> thanks,
>
> Mark
>
All traffic for the list n
Could we get a tag in the Subject for "Tapestry"?
All of my filters are looking for it and now that it is gone, my in-box is
starting to look like a Tapestry Meeting Room.
thanks,
Mark
Can spring "advise" be give to tapestry pages/actions?
Can components be auto wired?
e.g. I understand how to explicitly to the inject property, just wondering if
things can be autowired as well. Is this a "todo" in the spring integration?
Thanks,
Matt
This message, including any attachment
Silly question, where in the distribution?
-Original Message-
From: Brian K. Wallace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 5/10/2006 9:49 AM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: 3.x docs?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The 3.0.3 documentation is not 'lost', it's still part of t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The 3.0.3 documentation is not 'lost', it's still part of the 3.0.3
distribution. SOP is for the latest release of the docs to be on the
site, which - for the 3.X branch - is 3.0.4.
Mark Stang wrote:
> Boys and girls, am I to interpret the "loss" of t
Boys and girls, am I to interpret the "loss" of the 3.03 documentation as SOP?
I am a bit concerned that the documentation available to me no longer matches
my version.
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Kuhnert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 5/10/2006 9:31 AM
To: Tapestry users
Subje
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just letting you know I wondered the same thing... and that's even being
the one that did it.
Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
> Heh, wasn't trying to poke at you specifically . Was more of an internal
> thought that I expressed externally :)
>
> On 5/10/06, Bri
Heh, wasn't trying to poke at you specifically . Was more of an internal
thought that I expressed externally :)
On 5/10/06, Brian K. Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well, when it started out being just 3.0 - thinking the 3 thread would
die when
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well, when it started out being just 3.0 - thinking the 3 thread would
die when 4 came out it made a bit of sense... then 3.0.1 just kept it
going. So all I did was change the last 3 to a 4. One of those "it's
always been like that" things - except "al
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Stang wrote:
> They were here...
>
> http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry/3.0.3/doc/ComponentReference/index.html
>
They were, until 3.0.4 came out (actually a little longer as I didn't
have permission to remove them at the time). What's online is
(though I don't see why it says 3.0.X instead of just 3. )
On 5/10/06, Jesse Kuhnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry/3.0.4/doc/ComponentReference/index.html
It's linked on the main website as well.
On 5/10/06, Mark Stang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> They were h
look there:
http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry/3.0.4/doc/ComponentReference/index.html
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Stang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 5:26 PM
> To: Tapestry users; Tapestry users
> Subject: 3.x docs?
>
>
> They were here...
>
> http://j
http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry/3.0.4/doc/ComponentReference/index.html
It's linked on the main website as well.
On 5/10/06, Mark Stang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
They were here...
http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry/3.0.3/doc/ComponentReference/index.html
--
Jesse Kuhnert
Tacos/Tapestr
They were here...
http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry/3.0.3/doc/ComponentReference/index.html
In data Wed, 10 May 2006 14:24:41 +0200, marcopar ha scritto:
> I need a way to set the enctype of a form, actually i've tried:
>
oohh! finally i found the beast that caused my headache...
I did a small web application because i wanted to provide you with a
consistent test case.
As you can imagi
Jesse just applied my patch that includes auto-wire support for HiveMind
services. It should be available with the 4.1 release.
_
From: Martijn Hinten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 11:04 AM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: Page files or annotations? [was: V
> I'm curious if you've encountered any reason to override the
> other services,
> besides direct? For example, we use ExternalLink quite a
> bit, although
> AFAIK, no data actually gets updated from those pages, they
> are still wrapped
> in a transaction.
No, not yet. But I also felt a ti
That's exactly my problem. I use a container that is not Java 1.5
certified, so I cannot use annotations. However I am in favor of
keeping my .page files as short as possible. They only contain things
like page injections, service object injections and such, but almost no
components. All compon
...it is in the docs ...silly me :)
-Original Message-
From: Bode, Bianca
Sent: woensdag 10 mei 2006 16:52
To: Tapestry users
Subject: RE: Store property key in object and retrieve in .page?
See, i knew it would be something simple :)) Too bad there isn't any
info on this feature in the
See, i knew it would be something simple :))
Too bad there isn't any info on this feature in the Tapestry user Guide
/ Localization
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Andreou [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: woensdag 10 mei 2006 17:00
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: Store property key in o
Well, without autowiring (it'll be in there soon), you have to use .page
files to inject service objects into your pages if you're not willing to use
annotations. With autowiring, though, all you'll have to do is create a
"getter" for a property of the same type as one of the HiveMind services and
Marcus, thanks for the response.
I'm curious if you've encountered any reason to override the other services,
besides direct? For example, we use ExternalLink quite a bit, although
AFAIK, no data actually gets updated from those pages, they are still wrapped
in a transaction.
If anyone else
Bode, Bianca wrote:
Hi all,
Lets say I have an object 'car' containing a property 'color' of type
String. This property has a value of "options.blue";
Now when I want to display this String on a Page I would use an Insert
component and bind it to car.color.
But this is not what I
I think Sam has it right: it depends.
In my development, I never write page files -- but we don't have any
separate person devoted to the page design. That seems like the only
compelling case left for the page files, but it is somewhat
compelling: it keeps as much as possible out of the pag
Hi all,
Lets say I have an object 'car' containing a property 'color' of type
String. This property has a value of "options.blue";
Now when I want to display this String on a Page I would use an Insert
component and bind it to car.color.
But this is not what I want ofcourse :)
I have a property f
I've converted the DirectLink tutorial example and converted it into a
portlet.
Initially the portlet works, and I can increment the counter. If I
clicke the same link a second time however, nothing happens, the browser
doesn't even seem to request the url.
The same thing happens with the refresh
you should add to the form:
that + . worked for us (with Jetty)
Geoff
On 5/10/06, marcopar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In data Wed, 10 May 2006 15:43:21 +0200, Andreas Idl ha scritto:
> maybe you have a wrong charset defined.
>
> AFAIK the browser posts the form encoded according to the html
In data Wed, 10 May 2006 15:43:21 +0200, Andreas Idl ha scritto:
> maybe you have a wrong charset defined.
>
> AFAIK the browser posts the form encoded according to the html header's
> content type:
> .
i use the Shell component and the charset is set correctly.
ciao
I managed to get Eclipse 3.2 working with JettyLauncher 1.4.1 yesterday.
Took some jumping through plugin hoops (lots of other plugins had
issues, too), but seems to be fine now. Thanks everyone! Maybe I can
consider that 17" MacBook Pro now. :-)
/dev/mrg
-Original Message-
From: Geof
maybe you have a wrong charset defined.
AFAIK the browser posts the form encoded according to the html header's
content type:
.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In data Wed, 10 May 2006 15:11:34 +0200, Martin Strand ha scritto:
> URIEncoding="UTF-8"
someone told me this in the first thread i opened. the connector is this:
but setting the attribute does not solve my problem.
-
To uns
Hi.
There's no need to change the enctype to make this work. Just set
URIEncoding="UTF-8"on your element in server.xml.
Martin
marcopar wrote:
In data Wed, 10 May 2006 08:50:03 -0400, Jesse Kuhnert ha scritto:
That is indeed odd.
If you can provide me a use case where you need the F
Is this what you need
http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry/UsingCustomResourceSource ?
On 5/10/06, Marcel Schepers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
About two years ago there was a discussion on this list entitled 'General
architecture question regarding localization' which covered the question
how
In data Wed, 10 May 2006 14:49:44 +0200, Norbert Sándor ha scritto:
> The Upload component does this:
>
> IForm form = getForm();
>
> form.setEncodingType("multipart/form-data");
>
> Try the same in your component!
>
well, actually i'm using the base Form component righ
I often put informal parameters in my .page file, it seems to work fine.
Sam Gendler wrote:
On 5/10/06, Martijn Hinten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The only thing I hate is when informal parameters are important to the
function of the component, since, as far as I know, they must appear
in the htm
In data Wed, 10 May 2006 08:50:03 -0400, Jesse Kuhnert ha scritto:
> That is indeed odd.
>
> If you can provide me a use case where you need the Form component to
> support having the multipart attribute set ~not~ using the Upload component
> I can be more helpful.
basically i'm trying to post s
I don't have an answer to your question, I'm afraid, although i am
pretty sure you are heading in the right direction (I really wish
there was a lot more documentation about using hivemind with Tap4,
especially if it focuses on hivemind neophytes). I am definitely
interested in your solution, howe
That is indeed odd.
If you can provide me a use case where you need the Form component to
support having the multipart attribute set ~not~ using the Upload component
I can be more helpful.
On 5/10/06, marcopar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The enctype is added but also the Upload stuff is added a
The Upload component does this:
IForm form = getForm();
form.setEncodingType("multipart/form-data");
Try the same in your component!
Regards,
Norbi
marcopar wrote:
The enctype is added but also the Upload stuff is added and that is not
wanted.
ciao
In data Wed, 10 Ma
On 5/10/06, Martijn Hinten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have been wondering this for some time now: Is it the general consensus
to get rid of .page files and do all binding in the html (and injection via
annotations in the java classes)?
I think it depends on the size of your team and complex
The enctype is added but also the Upload stuff is added and that is not
wanted.
ciao
In data Wed, 10 May 2006 08:26:10 -0400, Jesse Kuhnert ha scritto:
> Try sticking an @Upload component in your form.
>
> On 5/10/06, marcopar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I need a way to set the enctype o
Again, "Enjoy Web Development with Tapestry" (the pdf book about tap4)
covers validation in detail. I highly recommend it. See the Tap home
page for details.
--sam
On 5/9/06, Rui Pacheco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You might not believe me, but I only saw the "validators" attribute now. And
I
Try sticking an @Upload component in your form.
On 5/10/06, marcopar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I need a way to set the enctype of a form, actually i've tried:
but the enctype attribute is removed and looking at the documentation i
can
see that this attribute is reserved so no surprise... bu
I need a way to set the enctype of a form, actually i've tried:
but the enctype attribute is removed and looking at the documentation i can
see that this attribute is reserved so no surprise... but what is the right
way so?
thank you
ciao
I have been wondering this for some time now: Is it the general
consensus to get rid of .page files and do all binding in the html (and
injection via annotations in the java classes)?
Rui Pacheco wrote:
I was just wondering if I was going to have to write .page
files for every
.html page th
Hello,
About two years ago there was a discussion on this list entitled 'General
architecture question regarding localization' which covered the question how
to get i18n messages when dealing with component specific property files is
not an option. Since the discussion was alive more than two yea
Hi,
i tried to implement two dependent select boxes.
This is my very simple test case.
Home.html:
Great! I'll update my patch on the Jira issue I created.
-Original Message-
From: Tat leung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 2:27 AM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: Tapernate-Example HiveMindAutowireWorker Problem
James,
The change resolved the problem that I was
Sounds simpler to me.
The only problem is, there is going to be a break between the implementation
and the documentation generally available on the web, which is almost all
related to Tapestry 3.0
If you do get rid of the .page files, there should be an effort to start
spreading through the web n
80 matches
Mail list logo
