Re: subversion 1.7 - Internal server error (HTTP 500) - user account gets locked out

2021-05-21 Thread Mark Phippard
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 2:14 PM jackson wrote: > > HI Mark , > > Thank you so much , i will enable the debug mode and do the testing and let > you know once done. I would suggest taking a look at the Apache error.log once you do as it will grow very fast. The LDAP module logs a fair amount and

Re: subversion 1.7 - Internal server error (HTTP 500) - user account gets locked out

2021-05-21 Thread jackson
HI Mark , Thank you so much , i will enable the debug mode and do the testing and let you know once done. Thanks & Regards, Jackson J On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 11:35 PM Mark Phippard wrote: > On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 8:49 AM jackson wrote: > > > > Hi Team, > > > &

Re: subversion 1.7 - Internal server error (HTTP 500) - user account gets locked out

2021-05-21 Thread Mark Phippard
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 8:49 AM jackson wrote: > > Hi Team, > > We are using subversion 1.7 version and we are facing issues very often when > the users trying to commit or checkout they are getting HTTP 500 error and > the user is getting locked out. The users are auth

Re: subversion 1.7 - Internal server error (HTTP 500) - user account gets locked out

2021-05-21 Thread jackson
y 21, 2021 at 9:17 PM Nathan Hartman wrote: > On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 8:48 AM jackson wrote: > > Hi Team, > > > > We are using subversion 1.7 version and we are facing issues very often > when the users trying to commit or checkout they are getting HTTP 500 error > and

Re: subversion 1.7 - Internal server error (HTTP 500) - user account gets locked out

2021-05-21 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 8:48 AM jackson wrote: > Hi Team, > > We are using subversion 1.7 version and we are facing issues very often when > the users trying to commit or checkout they are getting HTTP 500 error and > the user is getting locked out. The users are authenticated v

subversion 1.7 - Internal server error (HTTP 500) - user account gets locked out

2021-05-21 Thread jackson
Hi Team, We are using subversion 1.7 version and we are facing issues very often when the users trying to commit or checkout they are getting HTTP 500 error and the user is getting locked out. The users are authenticated via LDAP. At first we thought it was a server resource crunch issue and

Re: Bug Report: Subversion 1.7 segfaults when using gnome-keyring authentication (Linux x64)

2016-01-22 Thread Stefan Hett
Hi Vikram, Hi Stefan, Thank you for the response and clarification. Yes, I'm using 1.7.19 and I'm with that issue. And, I have tried installing CollabNet Subverion client 1.8.15 and I get a different issue (svn: E175013:) as below. I don't think its a credentials issue because it still fails

Re: Bug Report: Subversion 1.7 segfaults when using gnome-keyring authentication (Linux x64)

2016-01-22 Thread Vikram B
Hi Stefan, Thank you for the response and clarification. Yes, I'm using 1.7.19 and I'm with that issue. And, I have tried installing CollabNet Subverion client 1.8.15 and I get a different issue (svn: E175013:) as below. I don't think its a credentials issue because it still fails with the same e

Re: Bug Report: Subversion 1.7 segfaults when using gnome-keyring authentication (Linux x64)

2016-01-20 Thread Stefan Hett
Hi Vikram, Hi, I'm also stuck with this same issue, "svn up" makes svn segfaults and coring. This started happening when I give my new password set in my svn server. Can some one please help on this? Any help is highly appreciated. Thanks Vikram Unfortunately the 1.7 branch is no longer suppor

Re: Bug Report: Subversion 1.7 segfaults when using gnome-keyring authentication (Linux x64)

2016-01-19 Thread Vikram
Hi, I'm also stuck with this same issue, "svn up" makes svn segfaults and coring. This started happening when I give my new password set in my svn server. Can some one please help on this? Any help is highly appreciated. Thanks Vikram

Re: Security issue: $PATH _is_ set in pre-lock hook (Subversion 1.7)

2014-07-25 Thread Philip Martin
Julian Ruhe writes: > All of the sudden, starting somewhere prior to 1.7.13, the $PATH variable > is set, although the svnbook states > "For security reasons, the Subversion repository executes hook programs > with an empty environment—that is, no environment variables are set at all, > not even

Security issue: $PATH _is_ set in pre-lock hook (Subversion 1.7)

2014-07-24 Thread Julian Ruhe
All of the sudden, starting somewhere prior to 1.7.13, the $PATH variable is set, although the svnbook states "For security reasons, the Subversion repository executes hook programs with an empty environment—that is, no environment variables are set at all, not even $PATH (or %PATH%, under Windows)

Re: Subversion 1.7 on RHEL 4.x

2013-02-22 Thread Benson Margulies
Yes, I succeeded by following the link that was sent with the configure option. On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > Benson, hi. Did you ever get Subversion 1.7 working well on RHEL or > CentOS 4.x? I took a glance back at my old RPM building tools for > S

Subversion 1.7 on RHEL 4.x

2013-02-22 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
Benson, hi. Did you ever get Subversion 1.7 working well on RHEL or CentOS 4.x? I took a glance back at my old RPM building tools for Subversion 1.6.20 and 1.7.8, and getting 1.7.8 built on RHEL 4 was a pain in the keister. In particular, I wound up having to build and install libserf to avoid

Re: [Bug] [Subversion 1.7] svn blame doesn't work for locally modified files

2012-10-30 Thread Paul Burba
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 6:49 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > [ switching list, please drop users@ from further replies ] > > Konstantin Kolinko wrote on Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:43:14 +0400: >> 2011/10/14 Andrey Paramonov : >> > On 13.10.2011 22:31, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> >> >> >> On Oct 13, 2011, at 06

RE: Error in upgradation to Subversion 1.7

2012-10-08 Thread Cooke, Mark
> -Original Message- > From: JK V [mailto:jkme...@gmail.com] > Sent: 08 October 2012 10:28 > To: users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Error in upgradation to Subversion 1.7 > > Hello, > > I recently upgraded to subversion 1.7 and upgraded my workin

Error in upgradation to Subversion 1.7

2012-10-08 Thread JK V
Hello, I recently upgraded to subversion 1.7 and upgraded my working project copy to make it compatible with 1.7. I frequently face the below error whenever, I try to update my working copy and the working folder gets locked and I find it hard to release the lock as it complains the working

RE: AW: Corrupt .svn directory using Subversion 1.7

2012-08-21 Thread Bob Archer
> On 8/20/2012 4:21 AM, Philip Martin wrote: > > Steven Lee writes: > > > >> On Aug 19, 2012 11:45 PM, "Steven Lee" wrote: > >>> Yes, I tried "svn update --set-depth infinity" and nothing happened. > >> Many of the files are still missing from my working copy. It does > >> seem like that should

Re: AW: Corrupt .svn directory using Subversion 1.7

2012-08-21 Thread Philip Martin
Steven Lee writes: > svn up --set-depth empty foodir > > cleared out 'foodir', but > > svn up --set-depth infinity foodir > > did not bring any files back. You will have to look at the SQLite database to provide more information. Something like this may show what is going on: sqlite .svn/wc.

Re: AW: Corrupt .svn directory using Subversion 1.7

2012-08-21 Thread Steven Lee
svn up --set-depth empty foodir cleared out 'foodir', but svn up --set-depth infinity foodir did not bring any files back. 'svn checkout' did not work either. -Steven On 8/20/2012 4:21 AM, Philip Martin wrote: Steven Lee writes: On Aug 19, 2012 11:45 PM, "Steven Lee" wrote: Yes, I tri

RE: AW: Corrupt .svn directory using Subversion 1.7

2012-08-21 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com] > Sent: maandag 20 augustus 2012 22:10 > To: Philip Martin > Cc: Steven Lee; Markus Schaber; users@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: AW: Corrupt .svn directory using Subversion 1.7 > > O

Re: AW: Corrupt .svn directory using Subversion 1.7

2012-08-21 Thread Philip Martin
Johan Corveleyn writes: > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Philip Martin > wrote: >> Steven Lee writes: >> >>> On Aug 19, 2012 11:45 PM, "Steven Lee" wrote: Yes, I tried "svn update --set-depth infinity" and nothing happened. >>> Many of the files are still missing from my working co

Re: AW: Corrupt .svn directory using Subversion 1.7

2012-08-20 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Philip Martin wrote: > Steven Lee writes: > >> On Aug 19, 2012 11:45 PM, "Steven Lee" wrote: >>> >>> Yes, I tried "svn update --set-depth infinity" and nothing happened. >> Many of the files are still missing from my working copy. It does seem >> like that shoul

Re: AW: Corrupt .svn directory using Subversion 1.7

2012-08-20 Thread Philip Martin
Steven Lee writes: > On Aug 19, 2012 11:45 PM, "Steven Lee" wrote: >> >> Yes, I tried "svn update --set-depth infinity" and nothing happened. > Many of the files are still missing from my working copy. It does seem > like that should have worked. >> > > Just to be clear, I tried "svn update --s

Re: AW: Corrupt .svn directory using Subversion 1.7

2012-08-19 Thread Steven Lee
On Aug 19, 2012 11:45 PM, "Steven Lee" wrote: > > Yes, I tried "svn update --set-depth infinity" and nothing happened. Many of the files are still missing from my working copy. It does seem like that should have worked. > Just to be clear, I tried "svn update --set-depth infinity" in the foodir

Re: AW: Corrupt .svn directory using Subversion 1.7

2012-08-19 Thread Steven Lee
ere. > I tried to do a 'svn revert' and 'svn checkout' but nothing happens > because it thinks the files are already there. 'svn status' thinks nothing > has changed but 'svn ls' shows that some files/directories are missing from > my working co

Re: Corrupt .svn directory using Subversion 1.7

2012-08-19 Thread Thorsten Schöning
y. Please provide exact error messages as at least I don't seem to understand what/where your problem is depending on what you actually want to do. > Prior to Subversion 1.7, I would have been able to simply remove the > .svn directory /in that directory/ and check out the files again. If

AW: Corrupt .svn directory using Subversion 1.7

2012-08-19 Thread Markus Schaber
x27;svn > ls' shows that some files/directories are missing from my working copy. > Prior to Subversion 1.7, I would have been able to simply remove the .svn > directory in that directory and check out the files again. But now, I have > to remove the .svn directory at the to

Corrupt .svn directory using Subversion 1.7

2012-08-19 Thread Steven Lee
files are there. I tried to do a 'svn revert' and 'svn checkout' but nothing happens because it thinks the files are already there. 'svn status' thinks nothing has changed but 'svn ls' shows that some files/directories are missing from my working copy. Pr

Re: Working Copy on SMB/CIFS mounted network shares on [OS X Lion, Subversion 1.7.x]

2012-05-15 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On May 15, 2012, at 03:31, David Herges wrote: > 1.) Mount a (windows-hosted) network share as SMB/CIFS on my OS X Lion > 2.) Check out a working copy on the mounted share Don't do that. Keep working copies on local disks.

Working Copy on SMB/CIFS mounted network shares on [OS X Lion, Subversion 1.7.x]

2012-05-15 Thread David Herges
Hello, I can 9-out-of-10 replicate this behaviour when doing the following: 1.) Mount a (windows-hosted) network share as SMB/CIFS on my OS X Lion 2.) Check out a working copy on the mounted share If there is sufficient amount of data in the repo, the checkout will fail at some (random?) stage

Re: Where is Subversion 1.7's pristine copy of a given file?

2012-04-13 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Ryan Schmidt wrote on Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 05:28:41 -0500: > > On Apr 13, 2012, at 04:58, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > > Ryan Schmidt wrote on Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 04:55:17 -0500: > >> > >> On Apr 13, 2012, at 04:43, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > >> > >>> 1.x-compatible: > >>> use 'svn cat' to obtain a te

Re: Where is Subversion 1.7's pristine copy of a given file?

2012-04-13 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Apr 13, 2012, at 04:58, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Ryan Schmidt wrote on Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 04:55:17 -0500: >> >> On Apr 13, 2012, at 04:43, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >> >>> 1.x-compatible: >>> use 'svn cat' to obtain a tempfile. >> >> That's a good idea. It sounds like this would be less work an

Re: Where is Subversion 1.7's pristine copy of a given file?

2012-04-13 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Ryan Schmidt wrote on Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 04:55:17 -0500: > > On Apr 13, 2012, at 04:43, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > > 1.x-compatible: > > use 'svn cat' to obtain a tempfile. > > That's a good idea. It sounds like this would be less work and > automatically backward- and future-compatible. Indee

Re: Where is Subversion 1.7's pristine copy of a given file?

2012-04-13 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Apr 13, 2012, at 04:43, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Ryan Schmidt wrote on Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 03:55:34 -0500: > >> How can I modify this script to be compatible with a Subversion 1.7 >> format working copy? > > 1.7-specific, relies on implementation details: > `svn

Re: Where is Subversion 1.7's pristine copy of a given file?

2012-04-13 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Ryan Schmidt wrote on Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 03:55:34 -0500: > I have not upgraded to Subversion 1.7 yet. I'm still on 1.6.17. > > One reason is that there is a script I like to use, that I wrote, called > svntwdiff. It goes like this: > > > $ cat svntwdiff >

Re: Where is Subversion 1.7's pristine copy of a given file?

2012-04-13 Thread Ulrich Eckhardt
Am 13.04.2012 10:55, schrieb Ryan Schmidt: > "twdiff" is a command-line wrapper that comes with the GUI > TextWrangler editor; it opens the two given textfiles in TextWrangler > and lets me view and edit the differences between files. I often use > svntwdiff to examine changes in a file and selecti

Where is Subversion 1.7's pristine copy of a given file?

2012-04-13 Thread Ryan Schmidt
I have not upgraded to Subversion 1.7 yet. I'm still on 1.6.17. One reason is that there is a script I like to use, that I wrote, called svntwdiff. It goes like this: $ cat svntwdiff #!/bin/bash if [ -z "$1" ]; then echo "usage: $0 " exit 1 fi FILE="

Re: Subversion 1.7 server & client issue : not able to commit E160013 path not found

2012-03-27 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 5:43 AM, vishwajeet singh wrote: > Hi All, > > I recently upgraded from subversion server from 1.6 to 1.7, everything > works fine for 1.6 client and 1.7 server. > But when I upgrade to 1.7 client my commit fails with following error > > *svn: E160013: Commit failed (detail

Re: Subversion 1.7 server & client issue : not able to commit E160013 path not found

2012-03-27 Thread Philip Martin
Philip Martin writes: > vishwajeet singh writes: > >> As thread it's not just with mod_wsgi, problem persist with fcgi, can you >> please elaborate on reordering I tried moving wsgi module at end but that >> did not help. > > Reordering may not work; it depends how the other modules work. Fixin

Re: Subversion 1.7 server & client issue : not able to commit E160013 path not found

2012-03-26 Thread Philip Martin
vishwajeet singh writes: > As thread it's not just with mod_wsgi, problem persist with fcgi, can you > please elaborate on reordering I tried moving wsgi module at end but that > did not help. Reordering may not work; it depends how the other modules work. Fixing it may require code changes in

Re: Subversion 1.7 server & client issue : not able to commit E160013 path not found

2012-03-26 Thread vishwajeet singh
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 11:48 PM, Philip Martin wrote: > vishwajeet singh writes: > > >> > *svn: E160013: Commit failed (details follow):* > >> > *svn: E160013: '/svn/RDR/!svn/me' path not found* > > > >> "SVNAdvertiseV2Protocol off" might be a workaround. > >> > >> Note that there are known issu

Re: Subversion 1.7 server & client issue : not able to commit E160013 path not found

2012-03-26 Thread Philip Martin
vishwajeet singh writes: >> > *svn: E160013: Commit failed (details follow):* >> > *svn: E160013: '/svn/RDR/!svn/me' path not found* > >> "SVNAdvertiseV2Protocol off" might be a workaround. >> >> Note that there are known issues with httpd-2.4 support in svn with bdb >> repositories. > > I could

Re: Subversion 1.7 server & client issue : not able to commit E160013 path not found

2012-03-26 Thread Daniel Shahaf
"SVNAdvertiseV2Protocol off" might be a workaround. Note that there are known issues with httpd-2.4 support in svn with bdb repositories. vishwajeet singh wrote on Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 15:13:16 +0530: > Hi All, > > I recently upgraded from subversion server from 1.6 to 1.7, everything > works f

Re: Subversion 1.7 symlink problems

2012-02-17 Thread Fridtjof Busse
I opened # 4120. The ticket does not contain a script, but reproduction should be simple enough, I hope I provided all the necessary info. If not, I can send you the complete repo (contains only testing data). * Daniel Shahaf : > > At a guess the problem here is that 'status' dereferences the sym

Re: Subversion 1.7 symlink problems

2012-02-16 Thread Daniel Shahaf
At a guess the problem here is that 'status' dereferences the symlink when it shouldn't or didn't, so I don't think this is related to #4091. Could you file a new issue for this? And, if possible, provide a reproduction script. Thanks, Daniel Fridtjof Busse wrote on Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 16:02

Subversion 1.7 symlink problems

2012-02-16 Thread Fridtjof Busse
Hi, we've started to test Subversion 1.7.3 on linux and noticed a somewhat drastaic change in svn behavior. Our repo (also 1.7, a svnsync copy) contains a lot of symlinks and externals. Different from Subversion 1.6, every one of those symlinks shows up as "M" in "svn status". "svn diff" chokes

Re: Subversion 1.7 for Synology linux (ipkg)

2012-02-07 Thread Andy Levy
2012/2/7 Miroslav Friš : > Hello, > > I tried to upgrade Apache SVN on Synology Linux using IPKG tool. It reported > the latest version 1.6.17. Will be the newest version available for the ipkg > as well ? The Subversion project does not distribute binary releases. You'll need to ask whoever creat

Subversion 1.7 for Synology linux (ipkg)

2012-02-07 Thread Miroslav Friš
Hello, I tried to upgrade Apache SVN on Synology Linux using IPKG tool. It reported the latest version 1.6.17. Will be the newest version available for the ipkg as well ? I am not expert in linux, I hope this question has a sence. Thank you Miroslav Fris

Re: Circular cleanup/checkout problem using Subversion 1.7

2011-12-15 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 09:33:00 +0100: > After that, you can perform a new checkout on Windows. I don't think > you can salvage your partly checked out working copy, you should get a > new one (and if necessary, transfer your local changes to the new > working copy manually).

Re: Circular cleanup/checkout problem using Subversion 1.7

2011-12-15 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Strickland, Stuart wrote: > > In attempting to pull down a copy of the trunk to my PC, I inadvertently > accessed a file in the Subversion repository that was created on a > non-Windows machine. The file has a name containing a less-than sign, which > is illegal

Circular cleanup/checkout problem using Subversion 1.7

2011-12-14 Thread Strickland, Stuart
In attempting to pull down a copy of the trunk to my PC, I inadvertently accessed a file in the Subversion repository that was created on a non-Windows machine. The file has a name containing a less-than sign, which is illegal in DOS/Windows. This caused a circular condition in which Svn was una

Errors in Subversion 1.7 Build from source against Oracle HTTP server

2011-12-01 Thread ruchi sharma
Hi, I'm trying to build subversion 1.7.1 from source on Linux against Oracle HTTP server (64-bit, version 11.1.1.2.0 based on Apache 2.2.13 infrastructure). This is a critical project requirement and I've spent many days already trying to fix the problems. The current problem that the build is run

Another performance issue with subversion 1.7.x and nfs mounted working copies

2011-11-14 Thread michael_rytting
In addition to slow "svn rm" commands we are seeing some pretty severe slowdowns for "svn ci" as well. For example, here is an interesting situation. I want to checkin a single file in my repository. If I run "svn ci" from the root of my working copy it takes 1m11s to complete. However if I

Re: Subversion 1.7 and 'relocate'

2011-10-19 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Ulrich Eckhardt wrote on Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 11:34:03 +0200: > Am 18.10.2011 10:02, schrieb Daniel Shahaf: > >Johan Corveleyn wrote on Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 09:48:46 +0200: > >! is special in unix shells. But ^./ for the wc root? > > The caret ("^") is special in other shells, namely cmd.exe. Als

Re: Subversion 1.7 and 'relocate'

2011-10-19 Thread Ulrich Eckhardt
Am 18.10.2011 10:02, schrieb Daniel Shahaf: Johan Corveleyn wrote on Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 09:48:46 +0200: ! is special in unix shells. But ^./ for the wc root? The caret ("^") is special in other shells, namely cmd.exe. Also, wasn't the caret already used to refer to the repository root? Ul

Re: Subversion 1.7 upgrade

2011-10-18 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:33:38PM +, Ann Friauf wrote: > I upgraded to Subversion 1.7. I installed the Subversion 1.7 command line > client and TortoiseSVN 1.7. I successfully upgraded the working copy on > several folders. On the last one, after doing the upgrade, i

Re: Subversion 1.7 and 'relocate'

2011-10-18 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 09:48:46 +0200: > That said, maybe there is room for a general enhancement (for a future > svn version), to have some kind of alias to mean "working copy root". > Like the '^', which means repository root. Of course, there is always > the problem of dif

Re: Subversion 1.7 and 'relocate'

2011-10-18 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 3:03 AM, Talden wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 4:19 AM, Bob Archer wrote: >>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: >>> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 01:08:28PM +1300, Talden wrote: >>> >> Was there a reason that 'svn relocate' was designed to not just >>>

Subversion 1.7 upgrade

2011-10-17 Thread Ann Friauf
I upgraded to Subversion 1.7. I installed the Subversion 1.7 command line client and TortoiseSVN 1.7. I successfully upgraded the working copy on several folders. On the last one, after doing the upgrade, it shows 2 modifications. In both cases when I diff the modified files, the base version

Re: Subversion 1.7 and 'relocate'

2011-10-17 Thread Talden
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 4:19 AM, Bob Archer wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: >> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 01:08:28PM +1300, Talden wrote: >> >> Was there a reason that 'svn relocate' was designed to not just >> >> switch the containing working copy when you're in

RE: Subversion 1.7 and 'relocate'

2011-10-17 Thread Bob Archer
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 01:08:28PM +1300, Talden wrote: > > >> Was there a reason that 'svn relocate' was designed to not just > > >> switch the containing working copy when you're in a sub-folder of it? > > > > > > See http://svn.h

RE: Subversion 1.7 and 'relocate'

2011-10-17 Thread Bob Archer
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 01:08:28PM +1300, Talden wrote: > >> Was there a reason that 'svn relocate' was designed to not just > >> switch the containing working copy when you're in a sub-folder of it? > > > > See http://svn.haxx.se/users

Re: Subversion 1.7 and 'relocate'

2011-10-14 Thread Talden
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 03:20:05PM +1300, Talden wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: >> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 01:08:28PM +1300, Talden wrote: >> >> Was there a reason that 'svn relocate' was designed to n

Re: Subversion 1.7 and 'relocate'

2011-10-14 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Stefan Sperling wrote on Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 02:12:55 +0200: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 01:08:28PM +1300, Talden wrote: > > Was there a reason that 'svn relocate' was designed to not just switch > > the containing working copy when you're in a sub-folder of it? > > See http://svn.haxx.se/users/arc

Re: [Bug] [Subversion 1.7] svn blame doesn't work for locally modified files

2011-10-14 Thread Daniel Shahaf
[ switching list, please drop users@ from further replies ] Konstantin Kolinko wrote on Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:43:14 +0400: > 2011/10/14 Andrey Paramonov : > > On 13.10.2011 22:31, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> > >> On Oct 13, 2011, at 06:51, Andrey Paramonov wrote: > >> > > I believe Subversion c

Re: Subversion 1.7 and 'relocate'

2011-10-14 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 03:20:05PM +1300, Talden wrote: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 01:08:28PM +1300, Talden wrote: > >> Was there a reason that 'svn relocate' was designed to not just switch > >> the containing working copy when you're in

Re: [Bug] [Subversion 1.7] svn blame doesn't work for locally modified files

2011-10-14 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2011/10/14 Andrey Paramonov : > On 13.10.2011 22:31, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> >> On Oct 13, 2011, at 06:51, Andrey Paramonov wrote: >> > I believe Subversion can automagically translate line ending sequences > when transferring data to and from server. I use Windows, so I have CRLF > sequ

Re: [Bug] [Subversion 1.7] svn blame doesn't work for locally modified files

2011-10-13 Thread Andrey Paramonov
On 13.10.2011 22:31, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Oct 13, 2011, at 06:51, Andrey Paramonov wrote: I believe Subversion can automagically translate line ending sequences when transferring data to and from server. I use Windows, so I have CRLF sequences at the ends of the lines in my working copy. Th

Re: Subversion 1.7 and 'relocate'

2011-10-13 Thread Talden
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 01:08:28PM +1300, Talden wrote: >> Was there a reason that 'svn relocate' was designed to not just switch >> the containing working copy when you're in a sub-folder of it? > > See http://svn.haxx.se/users/archive-201

Re: Subversion 1.7 and 'relocate'

2011-10-13 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 01:08:28PM +1300, Talden wrote: > Was there a reason that 'svn relocate' was designed to not just switch > the containing working copy when you're in a sub-folder of it? See http://svn.haxx.se/users/archive-2011-10/0134.shtml

Subversion 1.7 and 'relocate'

2011-10-13 Thread Talden
Was there a reason that 'svn relocate' was designed to not just switch the containing working copy when you're in a sub-folder of it? If my current folder is c:\work\foo\bar and my working copy is rooted at c:\work\foo I can't just 'svn relocate MIRROR_PREFIX MASTER_PREFIX'. Oh no, instead svn te

Re: Applying missing or incorrect 'auto-props' in Subversion 1.7

2011-10-13 Thread Talden
s anyone aware of an alternative to svnprops.py (or an updated >> >> version) that works with Subversion 1.7 (and on Windows)? >> > >> > svnprops.py doesn't work with 1.7? What happens? >> >> The version I have identifies svn controlled directories by lookin

Re: Applying missing or incorrect 'auto-props' in Subversion 1.7

2011-10-13 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 10:15:04AM +1300, Talden wrote: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Ryan Schmidt > wrote: > > > > On Oct 12, 2011, at 16:35, Talden wrote: > > > >> Is anyone aware of an alternative to svnprops.py (or an updated > >> version) that

Re: Applying missing or incorrect 'auto-props' in Subversion 1.7

2011-10-13 Thread Talden
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Oct 12, 2011, at 16:35, Talden wrote: > >> Is anyone aware of an alternative to svnprops.py (or an updated >> version) that works with Subversion 1.7 (and on Windows)? > > svnprops.py doesn't work with 1

Re: Applying missing or incorrect 'auto-props' in Subversion 1.7

2011-10-13 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Oct 12, 2011, at 16:35, Talden wrote: > Is anyone aware of an alternative to svnprops.py (or an updated > version) that works with Subversion 1.7 (and on Windows)? svnprops.py doesn't work with 1.7? What happens?

Re: [Bug] [Subversion 1.7] svn blame doesn't work for locally modified files

2011-10-13 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Oct 13, 2011, at 06:51, Andrey Paramonov wrote: >>> I believe Subversion can automagically translate line ending sequences when >>> transferring data to and from server. I use Windows, so I have CRLF >>> sequences at the ends of the lines in my working copy. The question is: >>> what is the

Re: [Bug] [Subversion 1.7] svn blame doesn't work for locally modified files

2011-10-13 Thread Andrey Paramonov
On 13.10.2011 15:54, Daniel Shahaf wrote: Andrey Paramonov wrote on Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 15:51:46 +0400: On 13.10.2011 15:42, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 03:37:36PM +0400, Andrey Paramonov wrote: On 13.10.2011 15:24, Daniel Shahaf wrote: No, it's a feature, showing that tho

Re: [Bug] [Subversion 1.7] svn blame doesn't work for locally modified files

2011-10-13 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Andrey Paramonov wrote on Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 15:51:46 +0400: > On 13.10.2011 15:42, Stefan Sperling wrote: > >On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 03:37:36PM +0400, Andrey Paramonov wrote: > >>On 13.10.2011 15:24, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > >>>No, it's a feature, showing that those lines are new in the > >>>local

Re: [Bug] [Subversion 1.7] svn blame doesn't work for locally modified files

2011-10-13 Thread Andrey Paramonov
On 13.10.2011 15:42, Stefan Sperling wrote: On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 03:37:36PM +0400, Andrey Paramonov wrote: On 13.10.2011 15:24, Daniel Shahaf wrote: No, it's a feature, showing that those lines are new in the locally-modified version. You can do % svn blame file@BASE for the old behaviour.

Re: [Bug] [Subversion 1.7] svn blame doesn't work for locally modified files

2011-10-13 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 01:42:08PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 03:37:36PM +0400, Andrey Paramonov wrote: > > The new intended behavior seems very reasonable. However, the > > observed behavior is clearly a bug: I get "- -" for all lines, not > > just locally modified one

Re: [Bug] [Subversion 1.7] svn blame doesn't work for locally modified files

2011-10-13 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 03:37:36PM +0400, Andrey Paramonov wrote: > On 13.10.2011 15:24, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > >No, it's a feature, showing that those lines are new in the > >locally-modified version. You can do > >% svn blame file@BASE > >for the old behaviour. > > > > The new intended behavior

Re: [Bug] [Subversion 1.7] svn blame doesn't work for locally modified files

2011-10-13 Thread Andrey Paramonov
On 13.10.2011 15:24, Daniel Shahaf wrote: No, it's a feature, showing that those lines are new in the locally-modified version. You can do % svn blame file@BASE for the old behaviour. The new intended behavior seems very reasonable. However, the observed behavior is clearly a bug: I get "- -

Re: [Bug] [Subversion 1.7] svn blame doesn't work for locally modified files

2011-10-13 Thread Daniel Shahaf
No, it's a feature, showing that those lines are new in the locally-modified version. You can do % svn blame file@BASE for the old behaviour. Andrey Paramonov wrote on Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 13:14:35 +0400: > Hello! > > To reproduce: > 0) Checkout a working copy. > 1) svn blame somefile. You will

[Bug] [Subversion 1.7] svn blame doesn't work for locally modified files

2011-10-13 Thread Andrey Paramonov
Hello! To reproduce: 0) Checkout a working copy. 1) svn blame somefile. You will get lines of somefile annotated with revision and committer. 2) Modify somefile. 3) svn blame somefile. You will get lines of somefile annotated with double hyphens -- revision and committer information not availa

Applying missing or incorrect 'auto-props' in Subversion 1.7

2011-10-12 Thread Talden
Is anyone aware of an alternative to svnprops.py (or an updated version) that works with Subversion 1.7 (and on Windows)? If not I'll get my hands dirty but python-fu is weak and it'd be great not to have to reinvent the wheel unnecessarily. -- Talden

AW: Any significant memory usage impact with Subversion 1.7 client?

2011-09-08 Thread Markus Schaber
Hi, Von: David Aldrich [mailto:david.aldr...@emea.nec.com] > > > I have been asked whether the use of a SQLite-backed database in the > > > svn 1.7 client will increase the memory usage of the client > > > significantly. We are wondering whether the client has to load the > > > entire > > database

RE: Any significant memory usage impact with Subversion 1.7 client?

2011-09-07 Thread David Aldrich
> > I have been asked whether the use of a SQLite-backed database in the > > svn 1.7 client will increase the memory usage of the client > > significantly. We are wondering whether the client has to load the entire > database into memory. > > > > > > > > Can anyone comment on this please? > > I ju

Re: Any significant memory usage impact with Subversion 1.7 client?

2011-09-07 Thread Andy Levy
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 11:54, David Aldrich wrote: > Hi > > > > I have been asked whether the use of a SQLite-backed database in the svn 1.7 > client will increase the memory usage of the client significantly. We are > wondering whether the client has to load the entire database into memory. > > >

Any significant memory usage impact with Subversion 1.7 client?

2011-09-07 Thread David Aldrich
Hi I have been asked whether the use of a SQLite-backed database in the svn 1.7 client will increase the memory usage of the client significantly. We are wondering whether the client has to load the entire database into memory. Can anyone comment on this please? Best regards David

Re: Merge symmetry (was: Tree Conflicts with Subversion 1.7)

2011-08-22 Thread Andreas Krey
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 14:36:36 +, Stefan Sperling wrote: ... > In Subversion, a merge is the computation of a delta between two > arbitary trees, and the application of this delta to some other > arbitrary tree. To keep the (vector) addition analogy, you are measuring the difference from A to B

Re: Tree Conflicts with Subversion 1.7

2011-08-22 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 01:59:45PM +0200, Andreas Krey wrote: > It's not bug-worthy. AFAIR, when I (p) a property conflict, I get > the conflict markers into the property, and at least 'svn diff' does > not believe that properties (esp. svn:externals) may be multi-line, > and AFAIR you also just ge

Re: Merge symmetry (was: Tree Conflicts with Subversion 1.7)

2011-08-22 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 01:49:45PM +0200, Andreas Krey wrote: > On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 12:38:40 +, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 04:15:38PM +0200, Andreas Krey wrote: > ... > > > Actually, merging is a symmetric operation. The tree (and copyfrom > > > info) resulting from a me

Re: Tree Conflicts with Subversion 1.7

2011-08-22 Thread Andreas Krey
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 12:49:25 +, Stefan Sperling wrote: ... > > I'm used to manual merges, which means its always (p) with me. Which > > unfortunately does not work quite well with properties, as far I > > remember. > > Can you provide details? What doesn't work, exactly? > Is there already an

Re: Merge symmetry (was: Tree Conflicts with Subversion 1.7)

2011-08-22 Thread Andreas Krey
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 12:38:40 +, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 04:15:38PM +0200, Andreas Krey wrote: ... > > Actually, merging is a symmetric operation. The tree (and copyfrom > > info) resulting from a merge should be the same independent of in > > which direction the merge i

Re: Tree Conflicts with Subversion 1.7

2011-08-22 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 12:20:56PM +0200, Andreas Krey wrote: > On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 20:46:51 +, Stefan Sperling wrote: > ... > > > Actually I think these are better handled by throwing away the merge > > > results and doing the renames/removes on the respective branches, then > > > redo the mer

Re: Merge symmetry (was: Tree Conflicts with Subversion 1.7)

2011-08-22 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 04:15:38PM +0200, Andreas Krey wrote: > On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 13:51:40 +, Stein Somers wrote: > > > Now I realize merges are always asymmetric. > > Actually, merging is a symmetric operation. The tree (and copyfrom > info) resulting from a merge should be the same indepe

Merge symmetry (was: Tree Conflicts with Subversion 1.7)

2011-08-19 Thread Andreas Krey
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 13:51:40 +, Stein Somers wrote: > Now I realize merges are always asymmetric. Actually, merging is a symmetric operation. The tree (and copyfrom info) resulting from a merge should be the same independent of in which direction the merge is performed. In svn the metadata ju

Re: Tree Conflicts with Subversion 1.7

2011-08-19 Thread Stein Somers
On 18-Aug-11 21:01, Stefan Sperling wrote: Indeed, multiple copyfroms would be nasty. But I don't see the need. I definitely don't need it, I just saw a use in having it. My idea that you should be able to choose the source was based on a wrong assumption. Now I realize merges are always asy

Re: Tree Conflicts with Subversion 1.7

2011-08-19 Thread Andreas Krey
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 20:46:51 +, Stefan Sperling wrote: ... > > Actually I think these are better handled by throwing away the merge > > results and doing the renames/removes on the respective branches, then > > redo the merge. > > The above is only for "add vs. add" situations. > Scenarios inv

  1   2   >