On 2025-04-30 17:07, Doug Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 10:25 AM Doug Robinson
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 4:17 AM Andreas Stieger
wrote:
WANdisco is not a typical Subversion server implementation. For
synchronous multi-site replication (as opposed to sv
Folks:
I missed replying to one more detail that should be corrected.
On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 10:25 AM Doug Robinson
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 4:17 AM Andreas Stieger
> wrote:
>
>> WANdisco is not a typical Subversion server implementation. For
>> synchronous multi-site replication (as
Andreas, et. al.:
On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 4:17 AM Andreas Stieger
wrote:
>
> On 2025-04-29 18:53, LWChris wrote:
> > Therefore we suspect it was some kind of caching issue in the SVN
> > server (WANdisco) due to same path same UUID same commit number; after
> > restarting the SVN server, the iss
On 2025-04-29 18:53, LWChris wrote:
Therefore we suspect it was some kind of caching issue in the SVN
server (WANdisco) due to same path same UUID same commit number; after
restarting the SVN server, the issue went away. But I don't know if
WANdisco is a "typical server implementation", or if
