Folks:
I missed replying to one more detail that should be corrected.
On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 10:25 AM Doug Robinson <doug.robin...@cirata.com>
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 4:17 AM Andreas Stieger <andreas.stie...@gmx.de>
> wrote:
>
>> WANdisco is not a typical Subversion server implementation. For
>> synchronous multi-site replication (as opposed to svn sync which is
>> asynchronous), it provides a proxy layer with a consensus protocol
>> (think PAXOS, wsrep, raft).
>
>
The WANdisco implementation is still asynchronous even though we try
our hardest to make the replication occur absolutely as fast as possible.
The PAXOS implementation is used to schedule the order of the repository
updates. The updates then occur in that order at every site as soon as the
data is available and the prior update has been applied.
While a synchronous implementation might be great within a single data
center, it comes with way too many problems for a world-wide WAN
environment.
Cheers.
Doug
--
*Doug Robinson* Senior Product Manager
P +1 925 396 1125
*E* doug.robin...@cirata.com
--
THIS MESSAGE AND ANY ATTACHMENTS ARE CONFIDENTIAL, PROPRIETARY AND MAY
BE PRIVILEGED
If this message was misdirected, Cirata Ltd. and its
subsidiaries, ("Cirata") does not waive any confidentiality or privilege.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately and
destroy the message without disclosing its contents to anyone. Any
distribution, use or copying of this email or the information it contains
by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. The views and opinions
expressed in this email message are the author's own and may not reflect
the views and opinions of Cirata, unless the author is authorized by Cirata
to express such views or opinions on its behalf. All email sent to or from
this address is subject to electronic storage and review by Cirata.
Although Cirata operates anti-virus programs, it does not accept
responsibility for any damage whatsoever caused by viruses being passed.
