recently added Khopesh's one)
Any pointer will be welcome,
Thanks,
-Stephan
I'm running spam assassin default configuration which checks spf
records. In my case I received an email and it checked if the last
relay was a valid sender for SPF. The last relay was a server I have in
the cloud, so it failed SPF even though original sending server is on
senders SPF record.
traffic I see that there are no DNS responses (IPv4
and IPv6).
Many greetings,
Stephan
--
| Public Keys: http://fsing.rootsland.net/~stse/keys.html |
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
your problems?
Shade and sweet water!
Stephan
--
| Public Keys: http://fsing.rootsland.net/~stse/keys.html |
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
https://pastebin.com/raw/GtnV67Hj
Has anyone seen the same or similar issue recently? If not, can anyone
offer some advice or guidance?
Thanks!
Stephan
Hi,
My apologies, seems something went wrong with the formatting when it was
pasted to the pastebin. Here's a new example with spacing intact:
https://pastebin.com/raw/tQtSMQPs
In this example some of the other headers were also not 'seen'.
Thanks!
Stephan
On 2019/06/04 10:
Hi Charles,
My apologies, I forgot to provide feedback to the mailing list. Bad
regex was the cause of this problem for us, too. As soon as the custom
rule was fixed, the problem went away.
Kind Regards,
Stephan
On 2019/06/24 15:58, Charles Amstutz wrote:
But as has already been pointed
Hi Charles,
Yes, it was an incorrectly escaped forward slash in a subject rule.
On 2019/06/24 16:12, Charles Amstutz wrote:
Hi Charles,
My apologies, I forgot to provide feedback to the mailing list. Bad regex was
the cause of this problem for us, too. As soon as the custom rule was fixed,
the
you are using postfix/postscreen
with your DQS key?
Shade and sweet water!
Stephan
--
| Public Keys: http://fsing.rootsland.net/~stse/keys.html |
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
rcvd: 131
-
Anyone else seeing the same issue?
Thanks!
Stephan
sa-stats.pl? Has the above rror been seen by anyone
> else?
Yes, me:
# /root/.cpan/build/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.1/tools/sa-stats.pl -l
/var/log/mail.log
Error in option spec: "top|T:25"
Error in option spec: "SCALAR(0x85202d4)"
This also happens with no arguments given.
Regards
--
Stephan Paukner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GnuPG public key ID: 0xAC6B7700
Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.6.16, perl 5.8.4 on an average load between 3 and 4.
Greetings...
Stephan
pgpyL1sNPkccq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
n. I think this could further
improve the OCR feature (haven't tested the patch yet btw).
Regards,
Stephan
those internal networks to be recognized.
Any suggestions?
Greetings...
Stephan
pgpgj1M8KHkaF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
those internal networks to be recognized.
Any suggestions?
Greetings...
Stephan
pgpAgDVHtG2u7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ask}) == $net->{ip}) never gives true,
even when $ip == $net->{ip}
I debugged through it with many different IPs and subnet settings and it
didn't give true even once.
I'm about to prepare a workaround and a different implementation for this
method but I'm no good in perl so it still gives me headaches.
Greetings...
Stephan
pgpERkC5IPw9J.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Am Mittwoch, 29. März 2006 05:12 schrieb Matt Kettler:
> Stephan, If you want to do an implied mask to cover a whole, you MUST
> end in a . ie: you must use "10." not "10". If you fail to include a
> trailing dot, SA will expand with zeros, but it will treat it as
before I start debugging the problem. All versions I've
seen contain this 'error' so it can't be this rare.
Greetings...
Stephan
pgp4fQwwM8uMs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
unknown (HELO service3.colo.trueswitch.com)
([192.168.0.951]) (envelope-sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) by
mail.trueswitch.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 14 Jan 2007 22:54:12 -
regards
--
Stephan Paukner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
it so it may still yield OK results but be a
bit, well, modest?
Thanks...
Stephan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
t;official" hostname, which is also located
locally (just another interface in the same hosts).
Thanks in advance,
Stephan
--
Stephan Seitz
Senior System Administrator
*netz-haut* e.K.
multimediale kommunikation
zweierweg 22
97074 würzburg
fon: +49 931 2876247
fax: +49 931 2876248
web: w
> Von: Rosenbaum, Larry M. [mailto:rosenbau...@ornl.gov]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. März 2009 20:33
> An: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Betreff: RE: Hostname in X-Spam-Checker-Version Header
>
> > as shown in the manual, the X-Spam-Checker-Version header is not
> > configurable for some reason. I
22 matches
Mail list logo