at I expected.
For example, here I run it against a file containing just over 2100 spam:
$ sa-learn -u richard --spam spam
Learned tokens from 0 message(s) (0 message(s) examined)
(I was running it as root - which the docs don't mention but I figure is
what I'm supposed to do!)
In t
"failed to parse"
is this generally a problem?
what should i do to 'tame' this, namely, prevent the "failed to parse"
message ?
thanks,
richard
g: dns: Net::DNS version: 0.57
iirc (may not ...), there were some Net::DNS version issues causing probs.
perhaps try upgrading Net::DNS:
% perl -e 'use Net::DNS; print $Net::DNS::VERSION,"\n"'
0.58
richard
- --
/"\
\ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
X against HTML
l/perl_libs/vendorlib) at
/usr/local/perl_libs/sitelib/Mail/SpamAssassin/PluginHandler.pm line 96.
which includes both a SUCCESS & a FAILURE.
this seem unique to SendMail.pm.
am i config'ing wrong?
richard
- --
/"\
\ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
X against HTML email, vCards
/ \
than just an add to "TRUSTED_RULESETS" would be req'd ...
richard
- --
/"\
\ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
X against HTML email, vCards
/ \ & micro$oft attachments
[GPG] OpenMacNews at gmail dot com
fingerprint: 50C9 1C46 2F8F DE42 2EDB D460 95F7 DDBD 3671 08C6
-BEGIN PGP S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
hi,
>> can the rules_du_jour script be config'd to pickup plugin updates as well?
>> i'd guess more than just an add to "TRUSTED_RULESETS"
>
> everyone likes to have sa-update ruledujour now :-)
i'm sorry, i don't understand that sentence.
> r
lugin* updates as well?
i'd guess more than just an add to "TRUSTED_RULESETS" would be req'd ...
richard
- --
/"\
\ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
X against HTML email, vCards
/ \ & micro$oft attachments
[GPG] OpenMacNews at gmail dot com
fingerprint: 50C9 1C46 2F8F DE4
d for "the other project" to
undertake the effort/clarity, can there at least be SOME recognition
that clarity, if not simplicity, is a user requirement?
and, that we're talking about core functionality here, not something
horribly tangential ...
SA *is* about managing/processing ru
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
hi chris,
Chris Santerre wrote, On 8/11/06 9:26 AM:
>> from a user's perspective, all this is confusing/confounding. as a
>> user, i want to see/use one mechanism for rules.
>
> From an SA admin, it makes perfect sense. :)
well, given that i'm
to keep updated-- I don't
> understand the avoidance.
>
> Yes, an official way to update rules.
again to Chris' earlier point ... update & delivery, yes.
a "good thing" to have multiple, separate *sources*
cheers,
richard
- --
/"\
\ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
-- SARE -- leaning on your own
argument, is pointedly NOT undertaking to use/conform to sa's
'official' tools & capabilities -- namely, sa-update as a delivery
mechanism.
times change. so has SA. sa-update is now available. adapt!
finally, if, as an admin, you're ar
x27;ll make you a deal. you don't listen to me, and i won't listen to you.
if you want to stick your fingers in your ears, it's most assuredly no
skin off MY nose ...
> And your UNIX vs Winodws argument is pointless.
i did not MAKE a unix vs windows argument.
richard
- --
/&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
oops.
s/i did not say "SARE is rules"./i did not say "SARE is delivery"./
On 8/11/06 Richard wrote:
> i did not say "SARE is rules".
- --
/"\
\ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
X against HTML email, vCa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On 8/21/06 jdow wrote:
> Downloading and installing is a breeze
well, unless you're on OSX where you've got to find/build/install the
netpbm & gocr prereqs ...
working
- --
/"\
\ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
X against HTML email, vCards
/ \
rt of fink &
darwinports, as well as perhaps (? dunno ...) a precompiled lib in the
Gallery distro.
that said, I get good enough results with ImageInfo + the rest of by
env, without adding this complexity.
so, at least for now, i'm SOL.
richard
- --
/"\
\ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
installed this today, removed bogofilter...
also installed spamc, notice one of the suggested installs
was libnet-ident-perl, is anyone using this, with spamassassin ?
or is this a sparate module by itself.
Regards -
Richard
;<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Prev-Subject: [OziUsers-L] Digest Number 2420
Status: O
X-UID: 399617
Content-Length: 24702
X-Keywords:
Can anyone tell me why this email seems to be tagged as spam in spite of the
fact that the "from address" appears in a manual white list.
Thanks.
Richard
using sa-update interfere with the centos Up2Date system?
Thanks
Richard.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 14 March 2007 12:04 AM
To: John Rudd
Cc: Duane Hill; Robert Swan; Richard; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Spamassassin
o this from
address:
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Flag: YES
Should the Return-Path be recognised as a white list match? If so - do we
understand why it isn't happening here? If not - shouldn't it be?
Thanks to all who have commented so far...
Richard.
-Original Mess
out to see
what happens. Any thoughts on this possibility?
Thanks again
Richard.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 14 March 2007 10:52 PM
To: Richard
Subject: Re: Spamassassin doesn't seem to obey my whitelist
Richard wrote:
>> Ju
chanism if necessary), but I just don't have the time! Private replies
welcome!
Regards ... and thanks to the list for all the great and useful materials
- just wish I could absorb it all! (I'm now trying to relearn years worth
of stuff I've forgotten because I don't use it often enough! I only run
this one site's systems as an SA!)
Richard
--
Richard Troy
nnecessary materials," but I'll make an exception this time!
On 2023-02-28 at 22:46:54 UTC-0500 (Tue, 28 Feb 2023 19:46:54 -0800
(PST))
Richard Troy
is rumored to have said:
Hi All,
I've been subscribed for ... close to 15 years, I think? Heck, 20 is
maybe possible! ... Just
g again because it'll
be automagically moved for folks! Win!
Thanks much,
Richard
Hello list,
Is it possible to increase the weight of PYZOR_CHECK score?
R.
--
richard lucassen
http://contact.xaq.nl/
On Wed, 28 Jun 2023 11:17:43 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 28.06.23 um 10:46 schrieb Richard Lucassen:
> > Is it possible to increase the weight of PYZOR_CHECK score?
>
> what makes you think that PYZOR_CHECK is more special than any other
> rule?
>
> score PYZOR_CH
l_SpamAssassin_Conf.html#SCORING-OPTIONS
Thnx Tom, I'll have a look at it :-)
--
richard lucassen
http://contact.xaq.nl/
ass-mail is legit and a lot of false-positives is caused by
> morons marking mails they subscribed for as junk because they are to
> dumb to unsubscribe
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, but I’m not
sure about the universe.
--
richard lucassen
http://contact.xaq.nl/
Am 07.07.23 um 17:04 schrieb Richard:
I've FINALLY built up a "corpus" of ham vs spam and also FINALLY had some
time to spend on this and just ran sa-learn on, oh, IDK, some 10k email
messages or so, I'd guess. And along the way, I NEVER ONCE got the kind of
output r
format, I think -
somehow I guess I overlooked the -mbox switch!
Thanks,
Richard
amass-milter:/sbin/nologin
So... run it as sa-milt (my guess), or as root?
Note that this is on a Fedora Server v 38 - the OS is a couple of months
old.
Thanks again,
Richard
would need to
be changed, one would think, and somewhere the code told to run as
sa-milt, which I presume isn't THAT hard to find, though I've never dealt
with it before.
THANKS for pointing this out!
Richard
ook shows there are three for Spam Assassin on my system:
/etc/sysconfig/spamassassin
/etc/sysconfig/spamass-milter
/etc/sysconfig/spamass-milter-postfix
Before I make changes and possibly screw things up; any advice?
Thanks!
Richard
rite
into? ... Again, pointers would be nice - it's not like I was planning to
spend my day doing this; I have a customer visit planned that's coming up
soon! I just don't have much time!
Richard
bayes-db lives, nothing else
No worries, you've been a big help! ... You and Jared Hall!
Richard
On 01/04/2016 05:46 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 04.01.2016 um 13:53 schrieb a.sm...@ldexgroup.co.uk:
>> On Jan 4, 2016, 3:42 AM, rwmaillists at googlemail wrote:
>>>
>>> No look-up is done. RDNS_NONE tests whether rdns is recorded in the
>>> received header. You need either to turn it on or t
Hi everyone,
I have come across a strange issue where I need some guidance to debug.
I have 2 servers and when an email filters through 1 of them, I get this back -
(not cached, score=5.403,required 4,
BAYES_50 0.80,
HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28 1.40,
HTML_MESSAGE 0.30,
HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG 0.38,
LOCAL_M
-Original Message-
From: Reindl Harald [mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net]
Sent: 12 April 2016 16:15
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: XPRIO - Can you help me?
Am 12.04.2016 um 16:40 schrieb John Hardin:
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016, Richard Mealing wrote:
>
>> I have c
Hi everyone,
I'm seeing this a bit on google, but I'm not quite sure of the fix.
Apr 25 12:41:21.264 [49367] warn: rules: failed to run __KAM_SPF_NONE test,
skipping:
Apr 25 12:41:21.264 [49367] warn: (Can't locate object method
"check_for_spf_none" via package "Mail: [...]:SpamAssassin::PerMs
-Original Message-
From: RW [mailto:rwmailli...@googlemail.com]
Sent: 25 April 2016 13:13
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: KAM error?
On Mon, 25 Apr 2016 11:43:07 +
Richard Mealing wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm seeing this a bit on google, but I'
Hi everyone,
I am looking at Fuzzy ocr to detect more image spam and I had a couple of
questions;
1) Is this being used? Does it detect image spam, or should I be looking
at something else?
2) I'm getting some horny date spam coming through with just images and
text inside an image
>-Original Message-
>From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas [mailto:uh...@fantomas.sk]
>Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2016 14:30
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Image spam - FuzzyOCR?
>>On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:55:15 + Richard Mealing wrote:
>>>
Hi everyone,
I want to try and detect malicious uri in the body of emails better and thought
there might be something I could use, since I imagine google have a good list
of them. I found this link, but it fails to install.
http://search.cpan.org/~danborn/Bundle-SafeBrowsing/lib/Bundle/SafeBrow
I am using a rule to detect email with very long links included as I
have seen that those are mostly spam. Some of the messages will include
many copies of the link.
Is there a way to write a meta rule that detects multiple instances of
the same rule?
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 16:46 -0400, Glendon Solsberry wrote:
> I have messages that are being flagged via URI_HEX, without having
> *any* 'http' in them. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Snippage contains http://141641
imilarly, uribl-black objects to backup.sh
I'm not surprised that a message like this hits a number of rules.
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Richard Doyle
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 16:46 -0400, Glendon Solsberry wrote:
> >> I have messages that are being flagg
e url_2 10
score url_3 10
score url_4 10
But I want just one line to define the score. Are there more ways to do
this ?
Greetings .. Richard
On 03/23/2012 11:23 AM, RW wrote:
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 11:54:47 -0400
Kiryl Hakhovich wrote:
so here is my observation is that when email come spamd does less
rules checking or something??? vs when i ran it manually via sa-learn
it yell a lot more rules being detected.
could it be that there
On 03/29/2012 05:10 PM, Frank Chan wrote:
On 02-03-2012 15:49, Frank Chan wrote:
Here are some samples of this spam in pastebin:
http://pastebin.com/djidF7dg
http://pastebin.com/DQan00ve
http://pastebin.com/1PizAzMv
http://pastebin.com/Hd6vVpYi
Thank you,
Frank
On 02-03-2012 14:31, Jeremy McS
On 10/01/2012 09:53 AM, JP Kelly wrote:
> I am getting a bunch of particularly annoying spam which always has a short
> html body message similar to:
>
> HELLO dude
>
> Any ideas how to combat this spam?
Lower your threshold to 5.
>
> Here is an example:
>
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssass
SURBL has reorganized its lists and provided a new spamassassin
configuration to support those changes:
http://lists.surbl.org/pipermail/announce/2013-May/000209.html
I'm using sa-update (version 3.003001) and noticed that 25_uribl.cf
already contains the new configuration, but with all lines comm
Hypotheticians might want to look at jwhois, which is a caching whois
client. Cache expiration time is configurable ...
On 05/08/2013 06:45 AM, Chris Santerre wrote:
> RE: .pw / Palau URL domains in spam
>
> Hypothetically if one were running a reputation system and didn't want
> to block all of
xactly the same output. Is this correct? I have repeated this
several times with different messages. The sa-learn execution displays a
message like
Learned tokens from 2 message(s) (2 message(s) examined)
Richard Crane
---
Haskins Laboratories / (203) 865-6163 X 275 / FAX (203) 865-
On 06/09/2014 12:29 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 6/9/2014 3:24 PM, Patrick Domack wrote:
>> The point was, I have already done this, and have it in production. I
>> did this cause this subject keeps coming up from time to time, and I
>> was personally interested to see the results of it.
>>
>>
On 06/09/2014 02:42 PM, Matthias Leisi wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 11:31 PM, Richard Doyle
> mailto:lists...@islandnetworks.com>> wrote:
>
>
> A caching whois client (jwhois, for example) can significantly reduce
> the volume of queries.
>
>
>
On 06/25/2014 02:12 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> On Jun 25, 2014, at 2:58 PM, Axb wrote:
>
>> On 06/25/2014 10:21 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>>
>>> http://pastebin.com/qLyKx40b
>> "This paste has been removed!" :(
> I’ve temporarily posted it on ftp://ftp.redfish-solutions.com/pub/harp.eml
I
It is a new domain, created September 30 with namecheap. An effective
"new domain" system would catch lots of similar spam.
Oh, and I'm another satisfied invaluement customer.
On 09/30/2014 10:41 AM, David Jones wrote:
>>
>> From: Philip Prindeville
>> S
On 03/27/2015 11:51 AM, Amir Caspi wrote:
> On Mar 27, 2015, at 12:20 PM, Axb wrote:
>
>> - Please post missed spam samples in pastebin.com - do not post samples to
>> mailing lists
> Of course, I would never post it to the list. I will put up a few in
> pastebin but there are so many of them,
On 03/27/2015 03:44 PM, Amir Caspi wrote:
> On Mar 27, 2015, at 3:34 PM, Richard Doyle
> wrote:
>
>> All of these were "From:" domains created today.
> Shouldn't they have been picked up by DOB? Or do I need to manually enable
> some DOB plugin in SA? (If so
cket::IP [::1]:783 (running version 3.4.0)
...This gives the STRONG suggestion I should be putting that socket number
into postfix's smtpd_milters parameter...
OK, that's where I'm at; help humbly requested.
Regards,
Richard
On Thu, 16 Apr 2015, Marieke Janssen wrote:
On 2015-04-16 19:08, Richard Troy wrote:
postfix/smtpd[18151]: warning: connect to Milter service
unix:/run/spamass-milter/postfix/sock: No such file or directory
Postfix probably tries to read
/var/spool/postfix/run/spamass-milter/postfix
emove all doubt.
+------+
| Richard Lucassen, Utrecht|
+--+
problem:
1st time: 6 years ago (1 From: address)
2nd time: 2 months ago (1 From: address)
3rd time: last week (1 From: address)
:-)
R.
--
___
It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak
aloud and remove all doubt.
+--+
| Richard Lucassen, Utrecht|
+--+
cuda to not block my mail?
>
> Thanks,
> --Jered
>
The BRBL may have listed the entire /24 that includes your sending IPs.
Painful experience has shown that Barracuda won't hear your requests for
delisting, and the listing may never go away.
Barracuda have run their emailreg.org scam for many years.
-Richard
On 10/29/2015 01:04 PM, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 29 Oct 2015, at 11:09, Alex wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been receiving tons of messages not being tagged by spamassassin
>> on one host, despite it hitting bayes999, and wanted to see if there
>> was something that could be done.
>>
>> http://pastebin.co
Hi there,
Would this be the best list to talk about new rules for spamassassin?
I'm new here..
Thanks,
Rich
From: Joe Quinn [mailto:jqu...@pccc.com]
Sent: 02 November 2015 17:13
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: New rules..
On 11/2/2015 12:00 PM, Richard Mealing wrote:
Hi there,
Would this be the best list to talk about new rules for spamassassin?
I'm new here..
Thanks,
Rich
-Original Message-
From: John Hardin [mailto:jhar...@impsec.org]
Sent: 03 November 2015 17:18
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: New rules..
On Tue, 3 Nov 2015, Richard Mealing wrote:
> So I'm looking for something that would block this -
>
> fastnet.
First result on Google:
http://cweiske.de/tagebuch/uribl_blocked.htm
Short version: URIBL will block you if you use any of the big DNS
providers, such as 8.8.8.8.
On 4/30/20 11:59 AM, Tom Williams wrote:
> Hi! I'm new to this mailing list, but not new to SpamAssassin. I've
> used it on and off
es his lack of experience but also because I
really have other things to do and don't really want to be writing to this
list. ... This might be my last post here, IDK - it's certainly been
painful of the time I have available.
IF this project goes forward without said perpetual backwards
compatibility option, I will dump this project ASAP. And now, not later.
Regards,
Richard
--
Chief Scientist somewhere or other you can easily discover.
a given folder, and "learned from 0 messages" when invoked a second time on
the same unchanged folder.
Am I doing something wrong or do I misunderstand something?
Thanks, Richard
--
Richard Müller - Am Spring 9 - D-58802 Balve-Eisborn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.oeko-sorpe.de
sometimes 2 messages.
I expected it to learn from a lot of mails when invoked for the first time on
a given folder, and "learned from 0 messages" when invoked a second time on
the same unchanged folder.
Am I doing something wrong or do I misunderstand something?
Thanks, Richard
--
Ri
Is there a way I can set it so I dont receive mail from the list because I
check it through GMane. I want to be subscribed so I can post though.
--
Richard Humphrey
Systems Administrator
MultiCam L.P.
972-929-4070 x 2408
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are most of the rulesemporium rules 3.0 compliant yet or is there somewhere
else to get more 3.0 rulesets? I see a few specifically stated 3.0 compliant,
but not sure about any of the others..
--
Richard Humphrey
Systems Administrator
MultiCam L.P.
972-929-4070 x 2408
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
._)
Regards,
Richard
whatever, drop me a line personally and we can bash our heads together
for a while.
Richard
---
This email from dns has been validated by dnsMSS Managed Email Security and is
free from all known viruses.
For further information contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am trying to look at getting spamassassin 3.0 from the backport for
Debian to work with maildrop and I am getting a bit confused. First I
can't seem to get maildrop to read it's config file in /etc/maildroprc.
I added the logfile "/var/log/maildrop" directive and created the
logfile with the
I am looking at getting messages together to train spamassassin and told
users to forward me messages that are spam that still get through. Is
this an ok method of collecting or will the fact that so many are
forwarded messages throw off the training?
I have thought about setting up a specific
hanged, but if you have
a problem you can always drop me a line and I'll see what I can do.
Richard
-Original Message-
From: Gustafson, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25 November 2004 16:26
To: Bill Landry; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: sa-learn ham
I was referring
Title: Strange differences
I suspect that the first time you see the mail it is not
listed in the various URI blocklists, and when you re-run the message it
is.
R
From: Thomas Kinghorn [MTNNS -Rosebank] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 29 November 2004 05:42To:
users@spamassassin.apache.or
ld be useful? I'm far from a perl Guru, but with a few
pointers I could find my way around the code and could help with
development.
Richard
---
This email from dns has been validated by dnsMSS Managed Email Security and is free from all
Brightmail seems to be getting a lot of good press on the SPAM front.
So
I'm wondering, why do people running large mail systems choose SA over corporate
offerings. Is it cost? Is it configurability, or performance?
Can
anyone shed any light on how Brightmail achieves the rather impre
Thanks everyone for your useful and informative input. We are currently
re-evaluating our email services and your feedback has been a great
help.
Richard
---
This email from dns has been validated by dnsMSS Managed Email Security and is
free
The
Bayes DBase we use here was set to the default autolearn levels.
IT
was first set about 1 year ago and the first anyone looked at it was when I started looking at how it was performing.
Basically, it was tagging about 75% of mail as BAYES_00 (we receive about
70% SPAM here), so the
Title: Re: Bayes question
> So, what happens when you take these two
overlapping databases and> combine them is that certain tokens (those
that have overlap) are then> double counted. This makes the
database, at least according to the> bayes model SA is using,
statistically invalid.
Using
Hi Tim,
The script I sent you dumps the tokens out to a text file because SA
stores them in a Berkeley DB format. If you want to do it in place then
just have a look at the script and edit the appropriate values. If you
get really desperate then the two processes (encoding and decoding) are
essent
being more likely to be spam
than ham. This is quite bad. Is there any way to fix/prevent this
happening?
Thanks,
Richard
---
This email from dns has been validated by dnsMSS Managed Email Security and is free from all known viruses.
For further
Surely that would only happen if there were equal
amounts of Spam and ham passing through. Otherwise the token will have a
tendency toward whichever the program has seen more of.
From: Loren Wilton
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 December 2004
10:50To: users@spamassassin.apache.orgSubje
Does the /var/run/sendmail/spamass.sock exist?
- Original Message -
From: "Allan Sun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2004 2:55 PM
Subject: Broken pipe
> Hi everyone,
>
> I just installed SA 3.0.1 on my mail server,Mandrake 10.0,Sendmail
> 8.12.11,SpamAss-Milter
I use SA as a border gateway to Exchange 5.5, 2000, and 2003 servers in
a dozen or so locations. I have no problem with headers or any other
aspect of spamassassin. Exchange does not strip headers, however
Outlook and Outlook Express do!
But...
Are you using your 5.5 server as an SMTP bridgehe
Latest bogus-virus has a description that's too long...
This was caught during a RulesDuJour update...
***WARNING***: /usr/local/bin/spamassassin --lint failed.
Rolling configuration files back, not restarting SpamAssassin.
Rollback command is: mv -f
/etc/mail/spamassassin/bogus-virus-warnings.cf
It looks like your port had a 2.x local.cf file. To fix this, comment
out rewrite_subject, comment out subject_tag, comment out
use_terse_report, and change auto_learn to bayes_auto_learn
Also be sure you have something like the following section... (replace
amavis with whatever you prefer or
ection timed out
does this indeicate that I do not have enough spamd processes spawned or
that I dont have enough conns-per-child etc... or what?
any help please?
I was seeing the same. Increasing the number of spamd processes (-m) fixed
it for me.
Cheers,
Richard Hopkins,
Information Services,
Co
(Hey MOJO ... small world)
I've been following this thread, as I have a similar configuration to
Florian's. I'm running a modified Debian with a 2.4 kernel. Amavisd
version 2.2.0, clamav, and Spamassassin 3.0.2. I do not use apt-get for
spamassassin (or other items for that matter), as I find tha
I read that same install file. But, it just wasn't so...
RO
Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi,
3.0 requires a higher version of Perl than 2.63 did. I don't recall the
exact version required, but I know it is somewhere in the release or
upgrade
notes. Vague memory says that maybe 5.6.2 was the magic
, but
about amavisd-new.
The amavisd-new web site recommends perl 5.8.2 or better.
Just a guess
Steve
Hi Richard,
Perl 5.6.1 simply didn't work properly. It caused Amavis & SA to
strip
emails of their subject lines, failed to scan properly, had real
problems with spawning multiple
Yes... God forbid that you wouldn't have to pay a bill. Those bill payers
would be out of work.
Be sure to let us all know what company you work for so that we can divest
our stock as soon as possible ;-)
RO
- Original Message -
From: "William Holman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tue
Oh good! Can I buy a service contract too? Hopefully it's priced per spam!
RO
- Original Message -
From: "snowjack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 3:09 PM
Subject: Re: Unsubscribe?
> William Holman wrote:
> > I've been over-ruled by those who pay the bills,
Check to make sure that you don't have a phantom local.cf somewhere that's pointing SA
to the wrong directory for bayes. For instance, see if you have both a
/etc/spamassassin and /etc/mail/spamassassin folder.
Make sure it's not putting a new bayes database in your /.spamassassin
directory.
M
I haven't found any clues on this one, so I thought I would ask the list...
I use spamassassin 3.0.2 with amavisd (latest version). Everything works
properly and my spam headers look something like:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=12.975 tagged_above=3 required=6.3 tests=BAYES_99,
DCC_CHECK, URIBL_OB_SUR
1 - 100 of 374 matches
Mail list logo
