hat
indicated I could do this but I thought I'd better ask the pros.
Rich
> "Rich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 12/13/2004 02:54:23 PM:
>
>> Is there a way in user_prefs to rewrite the Subject lines to add a
> suffix
>> like [really spam] if the score exceeds a particular value? The host
>> provides SA but doesn't pro
will give garbage when decoding entities at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/Mail/SpamAssassin/HTML.pm line 182.
then I fed it my mail box of about 1800 ham (~58MB) and got
Out of memory!
Which is not very promising at all. So why is sa-learn so upset?
Rich
negative score (or, at least, a neutral zero)
if it's in a WL?
Rich
> On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 17:02:06 -0500, Rich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So why on earth is a 17-score given to an address in an auto white-list?
>> Shouldn't an address get a negative score (or, at least, a neutral zero)
>> if it's in a WL?
>
> You may
/Mail/SpamAssassin/HTML.pm line 182
Why isn't salearn handling these messages correctly?
Rich
I have recently upgrades from 2.x to 3.0.1 and have been watching the
scores for stuff that is real spam. I had a bunch of up-weighted scores in
2.x but I didn't move those over to the new version while I evaluated what
the new version was doing. What I don't understand are what seem to be
extremel
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am Montag, 20. Dezember 2004 14:36 schrieb Rich:
>> Nobody commented on the first mention of this so I'm repeating it:
>>
>> I move low-scoring but real spam to a folder and then run salearn on it.
>>
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 13:47:25 -0500 (EST), Rich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am Montag, 20. Dezember 2004 14:36 schrieb Rich:
Some messages trigger the following error:
Parsing of undecoded UTF-8 will give garbage when decoding entities at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.
forward to reviewing your contribution to one of the most
popular open source software events in the world!
Rich, for the ApacheCon Planners
--
Rich Bowen, VP Conferences
The Apache Software Foundation
https://apachecon.com/
@apachecon
vability; Search; Tomcat.
We will also feature keynotes from Ashley Wolf, Mark Cox, Alison Parker
and Michael Weinberg.
Details on the schedule, and these keynotes, can be found at
https://www.apachecon.com/acah2021/tracks/
We look forward to seeing you at this year’s ApacheCon!
– Rich Bowen,
lack
And follow us on Twitter - https://twitter.com/apachecon - for tips and
announcements during the event.
See you tomorrow!
--
Rich Bowen, VP Conferences
The Apache Software Foundation
https://apachecon.com/
@apachecon
:
Community
Big Data
Search
IoT
Cloud
Fintech
Pulsar
Tomcat
You can submit your session proposals starting today at
https://cfp.apachecon.com/
Rich Bowen, on behalf of the ApacheCon Planners
apachecon.com
@apachecon
your talk proposals in now!
Details here: https://apachecon.com/acna2022/cfp.html
--Rich, for the ApacheCon Planners
, including how to make reservations for discounted hotel
rooms in Halifax. Discounted rates will only be available until Sept.
5, so reserve soon!
--Rich, for the event planning team
Community growth starts by talking with those interested in your
project. ApacheCon North America is coming, are you?
We are delighted to announce that the Call For Presentations (CFP) is
now open for ApacheCon North America. You can submit your proposed
sessions at
http://events.linuxfoundation.o
speakers. So make sure your
abstracts clearly explain what you'll be talking about.
For further updated about ApacheCon, follow us on Twitter, @ApacheCon,
or drop by our IRC channel, #apachecon on the Freenode IRC network.
--
Rich Bowen
WWW: http://apachecon.com/
Twitter: @ApacheCon
r at @apachecon
* Join us on IRC, at #apachecon on the Freenode IRC network
* Join the apachecon-discuss mailing list by sending email to
apachecon-discuss-subscr...@apache.org
* Or contact me directly at rbo...@apache.org with questions,
comments, or to volunteer to help
See you in Sev
ividual e-mails that generate this
diagnostic, but I've looked at them and can't see anything obviously
strange.
Any thoughts?
--
*Rich Wales*
ri...@richw.org
> /OK, I can repro on trunk: . . . It's that very long block of QP
> blanks right at the end. . . . Please open a bug and attach that
> spample as a repro test case./
Done. (https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7374)
--
*Rich Wales*
ri...@richw.org
On 11/23/16 21:13, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> and output to this ticket of "spamassassin --lint -D 2>&1 >/tmp.txt"
> so all installed plugins versions are known, in case its already fixed
Done.
Rich Wales
ri...@richw.org
> try disabling any local rules to see if it helps. . . .
> it's apparently about rules, not about mail content.
I temporarily removed my local.cf file, but I still got the warning.
Rich Wales
ri...@richw.org
today at http://apachecon.com/ and submit your
talks. ApacheCon Miami is going to be our best ApacheCon yet, and you,
and your project, can’t afford to miss it.
--
Rich Bowen - rbo...@apache.org
VP, Conferences
http://apachecon.com
@apachecon
pachecon on the Freenode IRC network. Or
contact me - rbo...@apache.org - with any questions or concerns.
Thanks!
Rich Bowen, VP Conferences, Apache Software Foundation
--
(You've received this email because you're on a dev@ or users@ mailing
list of an Apache Software Foundation projec
Thanks, and we look forward to seeing you in Miami!
--
Rich Bowen
VP Conferences, Apache Software Foundation
rbo...@apache.org
Twitter: @apachecon
(You are receiving this email because you are subscribed to a dev@ or
users@ list of some Apache Software Foundation project. If you do not
wish to
ing list:
https://lists.apache.org/list.html?apachecon-disc...@apache.org
* Podcasts and speaker interviews: http://feathercast.apache.org/
* IRC: #apachecon on the https://freenode.net/
We look forward to seeing you in Miami!
--
Rich Bowen - VP Conferences, The Apache Software Foundation
http:
onsensus on this sort of thing? Thanks for any feedback.
Rich Wales
ri...@richw.org
alled Zen" is in error -- the ZEN
list combines SBL, XBL, and PBL.)
Comments on this? Am I missing something here?
Rich Wales
Palo Alto, CA
ri...@richw.org
ith a smaller group of
developers, so as not to give too many ideas to the black hats? :-)
Rich Wales
ri...@richw.org
4, or 17196.
Here is a sample rule which will detect the extraneous semicolon.
header BOGUS_RCVD_AMAVIS Received =~
/\(amavisd-new,\s+port\s+\d+\).+;\s*for\b/
--
*Rich Wales*
Palo Alto, CA
ri...@richw.org
> /do we have your permission to add this rule to SA's masscheck /
> autopromoting ?/
Yes, by all means, go ahead.
--
*Rich Wales*
ri...@richw.org
@ApacheCon on Twitter to be the first to hear announcements about
keynotes, the schedule, evening events, and everything you can expect to
see at the event.
See you in Montréal!
Sincerely, Rich Bowen, V.P. Events,
on behalf of the entire ApacheCon team
[1] http://www.apachecon.com/acna18
[2
chnically possible* to create a Spamassassin rule which would
match this sort of "From:" line?
And assuming it can be done, is it *worthwhile* to do it? I do realize
some perfectly legitimate "From:" lines conform to this same pattern,
and the only way to really tell the difference may be via AI or a real
human brain.
--
*Rich Wales*
ri...@richw.org
if your company wants to sponsor this
event, get in touch at h...@apachecon.com for opportunities that are
still available.
See you in Montreal!
Rich Bowen
VP Conferences, The Apache Software Foundation
h...@apachecon.com
@ApacheCon
[1] http://cloudstackcollab.org/
[2] http
.
Register today at http://apachecon.com/acna18 and we’ll see you in Montreal!
--
Rich Bowen
VP, Conferences, The Apache Software Foundation
h...@apachecon.com
@ApacheCon
areer advice.
Please take a look at: http://www.apachecon.com/usroadshow18/
(Note: You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to one
or more mailing lists at The Apache Software Foundation.)
Rich, for the ApacheCon Planners
--
rbo...@apache.org
http://apachecon.com
@ApacheCon
on at https://apachecon.com/aceu19/ .
Sponsorship opportunities are available for all events, with details
listed on each event’s site at http://apachecon.com/.
We look forward to seeing you!
Rich, for the ApacheCon Planners
@apachecon
ht,
and this seemed to suffice.
Since I'm using amavisd-new, I also killed off (had to use "kill -9")
all of the amavisd-new child processes (which were spinning at 100% and
didn't go away when I stopped the service). After doing this and
restarting amavisd-new, my mail queue emptied in no time.
Rich Wales
ri...@richw.org
also be running
ApacheCon Europe in Berlin in October. Details of that event are at
https://aceu19.apachecon.com/
Follow us on Twitter - @ApacheCon - for all the latest updates. See you
in Las Vegas!
Rich Bowen, VP Conferences, The ASF
rbo...@apache.org
http://apachecon.com/
/Other
The CFP will close Friday, May 1, 2020 8:00 AM (America/New_York time).
Submit early, submit often, at https://apachecon.com/acna2020/cfp
Rich, for the ApacheCon Planners
. Submit your talks today at
https://acna2020.jamhosted.net/
We hope to see you at the event!
Rich Bowen, VP Conferences, The Apache Software Foundation
lly, not fully).
I don't know that this is specifically related to SpamAssassin, but I
suspect that it might be. I've searched the Web with google but haven't
found anything useful. All help greatly appreciated.
TIA,
Rich
--
Dr. Richard B. Shepard, President
Applied Ecosystem S
my
whitelist (stored in the database), I see:
debug: bayes: Database connection established
debug: bayes: found bayes db version 3
debug: bayes: Using userid: 2
debug: Score set 3 chosen.
But, it's like it is not using the database at all
Any ideas as to where I can begin to look?
-Rich
-Q, --setuid-with-sql Enable SQL config (only
useful with -x,
-x, --nouser-configDisable user config files
Then again.. now that I read that.. maybe not so threatening.. :)
-Rich
Rich West wrote:
Now, I know I had this working with SA 3.0 and below on
like sed, uniq,
and sort can be pretty powerful.
--Rich
list of offenders to double-check and possibly add to a blacklist.
My next step will be to migrate the other MX server to postfix. Right
now, It accepts mail for non-existent users, passes them to the mailhub,
the hub generates a bounce, and the bounce either sits on the sendmail
MX server, or gets rejected by the postfix server.
--Rich
his, but
it's better than nothing...
Thanks,
Rich
Hi, I'm using SA 2.63 on freebsd 4.10. It seems that
whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in user_prefs isn't working, I have to fully specify the userid.
Does anyone have any ideas?
Thanks!
Rich
I should mention that the address in question is the user's own address;
he's cc:ing mail to himself. I have to fully specify his address.
According to Rich Winkel:
> Hi, I'm using SA 2.63 on freebsd 4.10. It seems that
> whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> in user_prefs
Bind 9.3.1 locally
also tried remote DNS server.
My email is backing up very slowly and I can't get it to process faster.
Any help would be wonderful. I'm stuck.
--
Best regards,
Rich mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
sults when I get them.
I have notice boat loads of DNS traffic from lookups - this may be the
thief of my efficiency.
again- thank you.
Rich
Wednesday, April 20, 2005, 8:59:28 PM, you wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 02:08:24PM -0400, Rich Chiuppi wrote:
>> I have noticed a 1-3 second
ed.
Been working well for several years.
A description and the script can be found at:
http://users.2z.net/rpuhek/scripts_public/misc/skip_sa.txt
--Rich
quot;somefile.cf" is the rule file. Replace my sample score of 5.00
with your desired score, and local.cf with your actual local.cf file
location.
(actually, for your case, a temp file might be in order, then paste back
into your file).
--Rich
uid=99,required_score=5.0,rhost=localhost.localdomain,raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=46005,mid=<[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>,autolearn=no
2 - How do I get SA to use a "global" ruleset since this will just be a gateway
and will have no local users on it?
Thanks in advance!
Rich
ock [EMAIL PROTECTED] You
can verify that the address is invalid first if you wish.
Is there a better way to handle something like this?
--
Rich Dygert
CompuServe classic Email SA
McDonald, Dan wrote:
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 11:15 -0500, Rich Dygert wrote:
Folks
I am the postmaster for @compuserve.com and @csi.com (the "i" is
important, @cs.com is someone else).
A couple months ago my email traffic doubled (from 1 million a day to 2
million a day).
so if I missed the information please
point me to the appropriate location.
Rich
is correlates with a distribution and SpamAssassin upgrade, so it
must be something different in SA that's triggering this response now.
Suggestions on how to proceed greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Rich
27;h' where you meant to use an 'H', thereby feeding *only*
the header to spamassassin?
## Call SpamAssassin
:0fw: spamassassin.lock
* < 256000
| spamassassin
This is how it's been for years.
Rich
/var/log/maillog
And this is from ~/procmail/recipes.rc:
## Call SpamAssassin
:0fw: spamassassin.lock
* < 256000
| spamassassin
Thanks,
Rich
< 256000
| spamassassin
The first recipe has been commented out for a while now, so the call to SA
is at the top of the list.
Next guess: Has this log summary grown in size past some limit that would
cause the whole body to be 'truncated'?
No. The log summary report (with headers) is < 26,000 bytes.
Rich
s saved message and look for anything unusual in the debug output.
There is always a blank line between headers and body. I tried running
'spamassassin -D' on the saved message and nothing happened. Should it take
more than a few seconds to complete and return a debug report?
Thanks,
Rich
t value for years without a problem. I'll
keep teaching SA that the log reports are ham and see if that makes a
difference. As I wrote earlier, this is all within the past quarter year,
and it's been a PITA since it's taken time and attention away from my
business.
Thanks,
Rich
Y,__ENV_AND_HDR_FROM_MATCH,__FB_NUM_PERCNT,__HAS_ANY_EMAIL,__HAS_ANY_URI,__HAS_MSGID,__HAS_RCVD,__HAS_SUBJECT,__KAM_MED2,__KAM_NUMBER2,__KAM_TIME4,__MISSING_REF,__MSGID_OK_DIGITS,__MSGID_OK_HOST,__MSOE_MID_WRONG_CASE,__NAKED_TO,__NONEMPTY_BODY,__SANE_MSGID,__TOCC_EXISTS,__hk_obfdomreq2
It suddenly jumps from 1.2 to 3.91 after looking for images. I don't know
where to fix that. I think that I need to update SPF, too, because that's
compiled against an earlier perl version.
Rich
Does Drako know you are posting here Bob?
It's a bit naughty. He had everyone sign a form saying they would not
post to places like this? You really should know better.
We all know that Barraucda are behind emailreg. We know that emailreg is
'cash for spamming'. We know that support have been to
ODY, while none of them had empty bodies.
Those from the google group mail list might have had a html-formatted
part, but the log reports are plain ASCII text.
What might possibly be triggering this false rule?
Rich
me) explanation.
Rich
self across as caring and
sharing. It's bullshit and anyone can smell it.
> I am also learning to count Jann among my friends, and I'm sure he would
> *appropriately* acknowledge your greeting.
>
> If your participation is at all typical of this community, that
ssassin
Where do I insert a call to formail and what is the appropriate format?
Thanks,
Rich
--
Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D. | IntegrityCredibility
Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc.|Innovation
<http://www.appl-ecosys.com> Voice: 503-667-4517 Fax: 503-667-8863
pearing in the spam hold mailbox, I'll relax.
Thank you all for the very helpful suggestions. I'll update the status
over the next days.
Rich
--
Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D. | IntegrityCredibility
Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc.|Innovat
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Rich Shepard wrote:
I started doing this today. Each of the false positive messages was
exported from alpine to a file, and I ran sa-learn on that file telling it
the text is ham.
Today the mail and logwatch summary reports appeared in my inbox and there
were no false
EMPTY_BODY m'^[^\n]+\n\s*$'
describe EMPTY_BODY Message has subject but no body
score EMPTY_BODY 2.5
It apparently used to work, but isn't with the new SA to which I upgraded
a few months ago.
Thanks,
Rich
--
Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D. | Integrity
On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 18:58 +0100, Jeremy Morton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've suddenly started getting a new slew of spams that are making their
> way through my SpamAssassin filter. Here's an example of one:
>
> http://pastebin.com/m586e296c
>
> As you can see they tend to hit a couple of blacklists
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009, Adam Katz wrote:
Since that regex matches nothing, I assume you meant it to be
m'^[^\n]+\n\s*$'s or m'^[^\n]+\n\s*$'ms
Adam,
I didn't write this. It apparently came with the local.cf file a few years
ago.
Rich
--
Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D.
On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 20:33 +0200, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
> Hi!
>
> >> http://pastebin.com/m586e296c
> >>
> >> As you can see they tend to hit a couple of blacklists, but don't get a
> >> high enough score to be marked as spam. What do your SpamAssassin
> >> analyses give of this e-mail, and a
ist of all such senders? Is there a better way
to tune this rule so it's not triggered so frequently?
Rich
--
Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D. | IntegrityCredibility
Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc.|Innovation
<http://www.appl-ecosys.com> Vo
It must have been the Slackware build/installation script that included it
because adding such a plug-in would not have occurred to me. Regardless, I
will decrease the score by 80%.
Thanks,
Rich
--
Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D. | IntegrityCredibility
Applie
much spam and malware out there.
I'm lowering the score on that rule.
Thanks,
Rich
--
Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D. | IntegrityCredibility
Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc.|Innovation
<http://www.appl-ecosys.com> Voice: 503-667-4517 Fax: 503-667-8863
with the SPAMBOT score lowered to 2.0, and
scores of 0.4 for the individual components.
Now that my mail has settled back to normal I'll again thank everyone and
leave the list.
Rich
--
Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D. | IntegrityCredibility
Applied Ecosystem Ser
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 13:33 +0200, Paweł Tęcza wrote:
> Ibrahim Harrani pisze:
> > Hi,
> >
> > another header from another image spams.
> > All images contain god, bad and a url with numbers.
>
> The spamers are cunning... It seems that they have stopped sending spams
> with X-Mailer: header cont
Make Her Beeg For More And More" is
> what i got
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: rich...@buzzhost.co.uk [mailto:rich...@buzzhost.co.uk]
> Sent: Wednesday, 17 June 2009 9:43 PM
> To: Paweł Tęcza
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: new spam image wit
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 15:02 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 17.06.09 13:48, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
> > But there are certain words you would never expect to see in the
> > subjects of legitimate mail none the less unless you often get mail with
> > words
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 18:02 +0300, Ibrahim Harrani wrote:
> http://pastebin.com/m6a027715
See if you can spot the keys;
1. Received: from unknown #if you don't know who you are goodbye.
2 (HELO .user.x) #mail servers don't tend to HELO/EHLO with
'user' 'dsl' 'ppp' as a rule.
3.(62.57.252.7
On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 14:04 -0400, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> main sleaze, as in spam from larger, established, 'legit' companies. I
> am seeing a 20% increase in spam that doesn't trigger any of the zombie,
> forged, gappy or dialup list rules. Neither are they triggering SARES
> or SOUGHT ru
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 13:32 +0200, Arvid Picciani wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm currently convincing my boss to throw away a domain that receives so
> much backscatter, its useless to try filtering the legitimate mail.
> Could i do anything useful with it?
> Spamtrap won't work since 99.99% of mails are ba
On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 13:35 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Sun, June 21, 2009 13:23, Jeremy Morton wrote:
> > My SpamAssassin apparently isn't checking this blocklist; how do I get
> > it to?
>
> cbl is part of zen.spamhaus.org, but some ips is not in sync that fast, so
> check cbl in mta level
Good morning,
Looking at the docs I see a 'don't add your customer rules here' warning
in reference to the default /usr/share/spamassassin dir. Instead it
lists a couple of options including local.cf
Is it possible to ask local.cf to include external files/dir for custom
rules at all?
Thanks
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 00:26 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
> > Good morning,
> >
> > Looking at the docs I see a 'don't add your customer rules here' warning
> > in reference to the default /usr/share/spamassassin dir. Instead
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 00:57 -0600, LuKreme wrote:
> On Jun 21, 2009, at 23:48, "rich...@buzzhost.co.uk" > wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 00:26 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> >> rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
> >>> Good morning,
> >>>
Noted this over at NANAE;
QUOTE:
All,
Please feel free to forward this message to any other location/mailing
list.
It comes with great sadness that I have to announce the imminent
closure
of SORBS. The University of Queensland have decided not to honor their
agreement with myself and SORBS
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 07:30 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 00:26 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> >
> >> rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
> >>
> >>> Good morning,
> >>>
> >>
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 07:53 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 07:30 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> >
> >> rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 00:26 -0400, Matt Ket
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 19:40 +0200, Arvid Picciani wrote:
> rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
> > It comes with great sadness that I have to announce the imminent
> > closure
> > of SORBS. The University of Queensland have decided not to honor their
> > agreement with mys
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 09:29 -0400, Jeff Moss wrote:
> WHAT? Sorbs and Spamhaus are polar opposites. Spamhaus is a great
> organization while SORBS is a POS that helped give all blacklists a
> bad name.
> I don't know if SpamAssassin has ever used it.
>
I respect any block list for targeting t
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 22:17 +0200, Arvid Picciani wrote:
> >> It does make you wonder why they never seem to end up on any of the
> >> spamhaus lists. Perhaps they are brilliant list washers ?
> >>
> >
> > Same here - I see lots of these and they don't score on many lists.
>
> It might be an unedu
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 22:50 +0200, Yet Another Ninja wrote:
> On 6/23/2009 10:37 PM, Lee wrote:
> >
> > Hello SpamAssassin fans,
> >
> > Having read and tried various things on the SA site and elsewhere, even
> > including some technically dead stuff in the Web Archive, I'm wondering
> > if any
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 00:07 +0200, mouss wrote:
> Res a écrit :
> > On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, mouss wrote:
> >
> >> payment were only needed for spam, not for "dul"
> >
> > not really :) despite what their site said/says.. its kind of a
> > detterent i think sunno we never paid
> >
>
> This is w
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 19:00 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
> Benny Pedersen wrote:
> 2) I didn't include free email providers in my list of "large and
> serious hosting providers" - I was thinking more of organisations such
> as 1and1, hetzner, rackspace etc. etc.
My special award goes to 1and1. I get
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 09:16 +1000, Res wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
>
> >> This is wrong. if you have evidence, show it. if not, stop spreading
> >> rumours. I have delisted an IP in the past, and I have been watching
> >> people try
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 17:41 +1000, Res wrote:
> if you jump on a bandwagon without first hand experience, thats *exactly*
> what you are, if you had experienced it first hand of course you become an
> authority on the subject in your your case, and your opinion matters as
> factual, but you by y
1 - 100 of 341 matches
Mail list logo
