I'm setting up a new server. However, email sent to the server
keeps getting "autolearn=failed". I don't seem to be able to figure
out is causing that.
--
Raquel
Those who make peaceful revolution impossib
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 18:31:03 -0700
Raquel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm setting up a new server. However, email sent to the server
> keeps getting "autolearn=failed". I don't seem to be able to
> figure out is causing that.
>
> --
> Raquel
>
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 18:39:40 -0700
Raquel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 18:31:03 -0700
> Raquel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm setting up a new server. However, email sent to the server
> > keeps getting "autolearn=failed"
On Mon, 03 Sep 2007 21:40:44 -0400
Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Raquel wrote:
> > I'm setting up a new server. However, email sent to the server
> > keeps getting "autolearn=failed". I don't seem to be able to
> > figure out is causing
On Mon, 03 Sep 2007 22:30:16 -0400
Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Raquel wrote:
> >
> >
> > I created a new user "spamassassin", with a password. I call
> > spamassassin-milter using the new user. However, I'm still
> > gettin
On Mon, 03 Sep 2007 22:34:01 -0400
Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Raquel wrote:
> > I created a new user "spamassassin", with a password. I call
> > spamassassin-milter using the new user. However, I'm still
> > getting "autolearn=faile
On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 18:44:35 -0700
Raquel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 18:39:40 -0700
> Raquel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 18:31:03 -0700
> > Raquel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I&
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:34:49 -0500 (CDT)
David B Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Sep 2007, Raquel wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 3 Sep 2007 18:31:03 -0700
> > Raquel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm setting up a new server. How
On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 01:22:15 -0500 (CDT)
Dave Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Raquel wrote:
>
> >>
> > bayes_path /usr/spamassassin/bayes
> > bayes_file_mode 0777
>
> OK, is the directory "/usr/spamassassin" writable by
On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 01:22:15 -0500 (CDT)
Dave Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Raquel wrote:
>
> >>
> > bayes_path /usr/spamassassin/bayes
> > bayes_file_mode 0777
>
> OK, is the directory "/usr/spamassassin" writable by
On a new server I'm running Debian Etch, Sendmail and SpamAssassin,
hosting email for a few accounts. I'm contemplating converting my
SpamAssassin to using MySQL. Is there a "HOWTO" somewhere which
would be good to
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:44:47 -0700
Raquel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On a new server I'm running Debian Etch, Sendmail and
> SpamAssassin, hosting email for a few accounts. I'm contemplating
> converting my SpamAssassin to using MySQL. Is there a "HOWTO"
iguration for all clients. It also allows
me to write a PHP program for clients to tweak their configuration,
or to use one that is already available.
--
Raquel
I hold it, that a little rebellion, now and then, is a good thing,
and as n
I have a question. Is there any advantage to using say,
Spamass-Milter over calling spamc from procmail?
--
Raquel
This above all: to thine own self be true; And it must follow, as
the night the day; Thou canst not then be false to
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:50:13 -0700 (PPT)
"John D. Hardin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, Raquel wrote:
>
> > I have a question. Is there any advantage to using say,
> > Spamass-Milter over calling spamc from procmail?
>
> Using a
er whitelist? As SA is run only once for all the
> recipients, it should go on a common set of rules.
>
> Bests,
>
> Olivier
>
Okay. Can a milter be used with MySQL? The docs seem to indicate
not.
--
Raquel
In fra
> high for comfort) if false positives are accounted for.
>
> See, for example:
> http://www.bcs.org/server.php?show=conWebDoc.14617
>
According to my server's stats:
91.19% of all mail is rejected at the MTA
92.97% of all mail is discarded at the MTA or marked as SPAM by
Spa
> I wonder if it would be bad to forge an unsubscribe requests in such
> cases, but I'm not sure they will understand what to do when they
> get the confirmation request ;-p
>
They knew what to do with the subscribe confirmation message.
--
Raquel
===
as sent a
confirmation email that had to be replied to in order to subscribe.
It's called "double opt-in". Just about as safe as can be for
getting only those who really want to subscribe.
--
Raquel
It is not the strongest
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 19:47:21 -0600
LuKreme wrote:
> On 12-Jun-2009, at 10:36, Raquel wrote:
> > It's called "double opt-in"
>
> No it's not. It's called 'subscription confirmation'.
>
> "Double opt-in" is a spammer phrase
ules Du Jour.
> > >
> >
> > Actually, the whole exit0.us site doesnt work.
>
> Its been down for almost 2 weeks. I thought it would come back up,
> but it may be gone for good :(
>
> --Chris
>
Then what do we do for rule updates?
--
Raquel
Whoever kindles the flames of intolerance is lighting a fire
underneath his own home.
--Harrold Stassen
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 15:39:18 -0500
Chris Santerre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Raquel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 3:33 PM
> > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> > Subject:
r good :(
> >
> > Then what do we do for rule updates?
>
> my understanding is that all (most?) rules are available by
> sa-update, as an alternative/interim solution if you like.
sa-update isn't included if we're running D
ll using Debian Sarge on servers).
--
Raquel
Censorship, like charity, should begin at home; but, unlike charity,
it should end there.
--Clare Booth Luce
eminded, is no
longer supported. If we haven't upgraded from Sarge to Etch yet,
despite having very valid reasons for not having upgraded ... we're
SOL.
--
Raquel
To be nobody - but - yourself ... in a world which is doing its bes
dable/writeable by all mail processes ... by all
users.
--
Raquel
The person born with a talent they are meant to use will find their
greatest happiness in using it.
--Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe
s changed to that of the mail
received. Mine are:
-rwxrwxrwx2 root root 908561 Sep 7 11:47
auto-whitelist.dir
-rwxrwxrwx2 root root 908561 Sep 7 11:47
auto-whitelist.pag
-rw-rw-rw-1 raquel raquel 41727 Sep 7 11:47
bayes_journal
-rwxrwxrwx1 root ro
e.org
>
> Oh, pooh.
>
> Timely (or perhaps prescient?) question, it seems they're coming
> across as List-ID: now.
I can't believe that every couple of weeks I'm adding another
condition to check for this list! Like you, I check "List-Id:".
Why can
he fundamental points against implementing it are:
Good letter. Procmail is a wonder if we take the time to learn it.
BTW ... what's the address of that list for discussing the shape of
Lay's Potato Chips?
--
Raquel
TRHMail - SAFE! Email
http
ily! ;)
> >
>
> On my desk at gradual school, I had a rather nice little sign that
> read "What to do I look like, an answer booth?". It at least made
> me feel better :-)
>
Many years ago I had a pin made, which read
White Mountains of New Hampshire.
>
> --Chris (Crying over the NHL.)
>
What would happen if you just announced that will
be the last update? Would you lose your purpose for living? (I
don't think so)
--
Raquel
We ca
link
> > from SURBL to consume a spammer's bandwidth allocation.
>
> IMO the best way to combat spam is not to buy the advertised
> product.
>
That seems like a no-brainer. What do I need a penis extender for?
--
Raquel
In order to be irreplaceable one must always be different.
--Coco Chanel
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 10:21:24 -0400
Jim Maul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Raquel Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 01:11:39 -0700
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Kenneth Porter wrote:
> >>
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:40:16 -0400
Chris Santerre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I keep getting a timeout going to www.spamassassin.org. And the
> spamassassin.apache.org site as well.
>
> Anyone else?
>
> Chris Santerre
Maybe it's *you*
something I noticed in the
> logs.
>
I've been getting more in the last few days than during any period
in the past!
--
Raquel
All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others.
--George Orwell, "Animal Farm"
ntainted source as I can get from other quality mail programs
> like mozilla, and thunderbird.
>
http://www.slipstick.com/mail1/viewheaders.htm
--
Raquel
I would rather live in a world where my life is surrounded by
mystery than
Download and scan URLs
>
> Bill
>
Quoted from man clamd.conf
MailFollowURLs
If an email contains URLs ClamAV can download and scan
them. WARNING: This
option may open your system to a DoS attack.
Never use it on loaded
servers.
Default: disabled
--
Raquel
A man cannot be comfortable without his own approval.
--Mark Twain
hanks,
>
> Chris
In conjuction with my_rules_du_jour, it maintains custom rulesets.
When the publicly available rulesets are updated, they will update
the rulesets you use for your server.
--
Raquel
The surest way to corrupt a youth is to inst
t;
> Where could I find ?
>
> [This is a crosspost to SA and Debian list so please set the
> "Reply-to":]
> --
I don't think that cross-posting is accpetable on either list.
However, try www.backports.org
--
Raquel
oftware you're using. I use
sendmail and procmail. In my .procmailrc:
SPAM50FOLDER = /dev/null
:0
* ^X-Spam-Level:
\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\
*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*
${SPAM50FOLDER}
--
Raquel
===
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:48:33 -0800
Raquel Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:23:50 -0800
> "Jerry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Anyone have any examples of how to read the "X-Spam-Level:
> > &
; able to get down to 2-3 seconds, basically cutting my processing
> time in half!
>
> .jon
>
For me, spamstats returns ...
Average message analysis time : 5.64 seconds
Average spam analysis time : 5.54 seconds
Average clean message analysis time
42 matches
Mail list logo
