Is there a way with spamassassin local.conf to add a higher score
based on source ip address or subnet? Basically the last IP in
"Received:" header.
bad_subnet_add_20_points: 192.168.240.0/24
Raising the score if that IP appeared anywhere in headers or body
might work too.
;even increase my false positive rate'
Perhaps for authenticated SMTP not record the IP address in the
headers but rather just the authenticated username in the headers. I
think Squirrelmail does that. Your MTA logs will have the IP recorded
if needed later.
Matt
> By the way I'm not a big fan of registering my servers to any private
> entity in order to improve "deliverability".
Register our servers here: www.dnswl.org Do not really use it for
scoring but do not grey list any servers listed.
Matt
Could a similiar thing be accomplished with a simple list of free
email provider etc. domains and checking there SPF or DKIM records and
if they pass bypassing any other DNS lists?
So any email from hotmail.com, gmail.com, yahoo.com, etc. if there SPF
or DKIM passes skip any further DNS tests?
>> The legitimate mail that passes through my mail server comes from
>> hosts / networks I might not hear from again for months, by which
>> time I have to potentially wait 24 hours for the greylisting / mail
>> server to try again.
I run greylisting on an email server with several thousand email
The legitimate mail that passes through my mail server comes from
hosts / networks I might not hear from again for months, by which
time I have to potentially wait 24 hours for the greylisting / mail
server to try again.
>>
>> I run greylisting on an email server with several th
I think this would be a great idea. Many end users never bother to
delete old emails and on some, such as sales etc, there is no valid
reason for them to countinue to waste disk and server space.
http://www.zdnet.com/news/should-emails-have-an-expiration-date/6197888
Looking at top 8 newest messages from my personnel email account:
Newsletter
Magazine Renwal Offer
Ebook Update Notice
Travel Deal of Week
Sales Flyer with weekly specials
Reply to forum thread
Anouther Newsletter
Custommer Service Response.
Etc.
Hmm. All of these could really expire at 30 day ma
>> Looking at top 8 newest messages from my personnel email account:
>
> [Spammy subjects deleted]
None of them are SPAM. If I wanted to unsubscribe from them I would.
Its just if I do not read them within 30 days why keep them.
> It looks like you need some sort of anti-spam system. Maybe
> so
I am running spamassassin-3.2.5-1.el5 on 64 bit CentOS.
sa-update -D seems to indicate that the DKIM libraries are installed.
May 18 10:25:02.682 [15134] dbg: diag: [...] module installed:
Digest::SHA1, version 2.11
May 18 10:25:02.682 [15134] dbg: diag: [...] module installed:
HTML::Parser, vers
>> Looking at the X-Spam-Report on various messages and I never see that
>> its looked at. I see that SPF is checked and scored. Any idea why
>> its not checking the DKIM signatures?
>
> Check the file v312.pre and see if the "loadplugin" line for DKIM is
> commented out. If it is, uncomment it
Most seem to get through for me. What are you doing to catch them?
I added this too local.conf and it did not help at all:
#ok_languages en es fr de cs da lv nl pl sv
ok_languages en
TextCat appears to be enabled in v310.pre:
# TextCat - language guesser
#
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin
>> Hear is the typical hits I get on a message:
>>
>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.4 required=5.0 tests=BODY_8BITS,HTML_MESSAGE,
>> MIME_HTML_ONLY,RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS
>> autolearn=no
>> version=3.3.1
>
> ...
>>
>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.6 required=5.0 tests
> Most here score along this:
>
> X-Spam-Status: Reqd:5.0 Hits:14.6 Tests:BODY_8BITS=1.5
> CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2 HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45
> MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.105 MISSING_HEADERS=1.207 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT=1.644
> TVD_SPACE_RATIO_MINFP=0.674 UNWANTED_LANG
Is there a way to tell SA to skip blacklist checks against certain IP
pools? I still want all other tests run but the IP may be listed in
SORBS-DUHL and others due to being dynamic.
we are using zen.spamhaus.org and psbl.surriel.com DNSBL at MTA level
(qmail + rblsmtpd) so we would like to disable this check in
spamassassin. So we added this in local.cf:
>
> and, since DNS is cached anyway, why bother disabling them?
+1
Doubt it costs anything to run both plac
I have messages marked as such:
RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
Problem is they very clearly have reverse and matching forward DNS
that Exim even agrees on. Why is SA tagging them as such?
> Spamhaus already do this. It's called the Exploits Block List (XBL):
>
> http://www.spamhaus.org/xbl/
>
> To quote:
>
> The Spamhaus Exploits Block List (XBL) is a realtime database of IP
> addresses of hijacked PCs infected by illegal 3rd party exploits, including
> open proxies (HTTP, socks, An
>> I've never had any
>> complaints about delivery speed, but some senders have broken mail
>> servers that don't retry on receiving a temporary failure.
>
> Many such servers use broken SMTP implementations that can't handle
> a 4xx code in response to RCPT properly.
>
> We greylist after the end
>> We greylist after the end of DATA. This wastes bandwidth, but lets us
>> use the Subject: line as an additional mix in the greylisting tuple.
>> This catches ratware that retries in the face of greylisting, but
>> mutates the subject line with each retry.
> We use grey listing on our low volum
>> You will probably want to put a little effort into maintaining lists
>> of regular correspondents who can bypass greylisting. There may be
>> tools to automate that, e.g. to whitelist someone a local user has
>> sent mail to.
>
> Has anyone looked into the use of a DNS-based white listing servic
I am using Exim directors to call Spamassassin. I do not scan
messages that come in on port 587 or are in my popb4smtp file. This
was done due to some of those IP's being on DUL blacklists and getting
flagged.
Is there a way to tell SA to skip certain tests if the message came in
on authenticate
I am seeing tons of junk getting through claiming to be from the USPS
about a missed delivery package. Anyone else seeing this?
I am running SpamAssassin 3.3.1 and execute sa-update weekly.
When doing sa-update -D I get this:
dbg: diag: [...] module not installed: Mail::SPF ('require' failed)
What do I need to get this on Centos?
I see this:
# yum list available |grep -i spf
libspf2.x86_64 1.2.9-1.el6.rf rpmforge
libspf2-devel.x86_64
I am running Spamassassin 3.003002 and sa-update -D indicates I have
these modules installed.
module installed: Digest::SHA1, version 2.12
module installed: HTML::Parser, version 3.64
module installed: Net::DNS, version 0.65
module installed: NetAddr::IP, version 4.027
module installed: Time::HiRe
or 4.5 and is spam. I have the bigevil files and a bunch of
the other files from the rules emporium but still things don't seem to
be getting marked. Any pointers? I am running spamassassin 2.64 at
the moment.
~ matt
We've been getting some of these e-mails (see attached) and I'm
wondering how to stop them. They are totally not in english so I'm
struggeling...
--- Begin Message ---
Title: ÐÐÑÐÐÐÑÐ Ð ÐÐÑÐÐÐÑÐÑÐ ÐÐ
Matthew Kiessling
Chilitech Internet
Solutions
570-323-21
Uggg.. that didn't come through right.. let me try this again.. they
look like this:
ÐÐÑÐÐÐÑÐÑÑ ÐÐÐÑÑ ÐÐÐÑÑÑ ÐÑÐ ÐÑÐÐÑÐÐ,
ÐÐÐÑÑÐÐ ÑÐÐÑÐÑÑÑÑ
ÐÐÑÑÐÐÑÐÐÑÑÑ. ÐÐÐ ÐÐ ÑÐÐÐÑÑÐÑÑ ÐÑ Ð
ÐÐÑÐÑÐ Ð ÐÑÐÐÐÑÐ
ÐÐÑÐÐÐÑÐÐÐ ÐÐÐÑÑ Ð ÐÐÑÐÐÐÑÐÑÑ ÐÐÑ, Ñ
ÐÐ ÐÐÐÑÐÑÐÐÐ ÐÐÐÑÑ
ÑÑÑ ÐÑÑÐÐÐÑÐÑÑ
Hi,
I have a question on the new(ish) scanning that spamassassin does on
URI's.It seems to be working very well for us here, but I have a
question..
WIll it catch:
http://www.blah.com/?jj38942
as well as
http://www.blah.com/?34223
We are beginning to notice alot of e-mails (being marked ri
:
Thread-Topic: Problem with Mail?
thread-index: AcSvpdPjK6iINjJWQQWdVehj1wUvDgDPs2Nw
Importance: normal
Priority: normal
From: "Durman, Michael R." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Oct 2004 18:29:
What's odd is it DOES take 600 seconds every time it's sent.. what's
additionally wierd is this person's mail server keeps sending the
message over and over.. once an hour... (we're working on that with
him). He's the only one in the millions of emails we handle every day
that is having this issue
Hi,
Is there anyway that I can get spamassassin to run in "mock" mode?
That is, to only log what would be marked, but to not actually mark
it? I basically want to test the mail server to see what messages
would be marked and which ones would not.
Hi,
Does anyone have experience with using spamassassin and rule sets at a
college environment? We'd like to block just mail that is one
hundred percent spam, and not risk blocking false positives. Any
thoughts or ideas?
Hi,
Perhaps someone can help here. I have recently added the SURBL
functionality to my SpamAssassin installation, and things seem to work
wonderfully. However, we do on a fairly regular basis seem to be the
"first" to get hit with the spam. What I mean is that spamassassin
will catch it only
I figured as much (that the messages just weren't in the SURBL lists,
but I'd still like to find a way to mark them =) Here attached is one
that looks alot like the ones that come through (my apologies... clean
your eyes out with soap afterwards). This account that received it
is kinda a 'spam t
I'll be more then h appy to report them, but is there anything we can
do to get spamassassin to detect them more?
On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 04:51:21 -0800, Jeff Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 3, 2004, 4:45:24 AM, Matt Matt wrote:
>
>
> > I figured
th the detection of these 'image' only spams?
On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 05:13:35 -0800, Jeff Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 3, 2004, 5:09:24 AM, Matt Matt wrote:
> > I'll be more then h appy to report them, but is there anything we can
> > do
Hi,
As much as I hate Outlook, I have to support it.. ugh..
Is there anyway to get the full source and message, from outlook
without having to view source, then view headers? I want the full
untainted source as I can get from other quality mail programs like
mozilla, and thunderbird.
Yeah that views the headers.. the problem is that to get the un-munged
message in raw format you can't touch the header/body combo and need
to get it as is.
On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 12:46:59 -0800, Raquel Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 13:58:10 -0500
>
What do I need to do to send a sample spam to the list and have it get
through? I think I just got blocked:
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
users@spamassassin.apache.org
Technical details of failure:
P
Hello,
I am running SpamAssassin version 2.64... yes I know it's a little old
but it serves well and I've been a bit scared to upgrade to 3.0...
will be doing that soon now that things seem to be running well for
people...
My issue is that spamd seems to be hanging on me.. I can't quite tell
where
Seems to chug on through it.. doesn't hesitate at all.. yet if I
turn spamassassin scanning on.. the mail server starts lagging so bad
it's not even funny..
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 21:35:50 -0600, Keith Whyte
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Matt, maybe you could try running
an3/Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL.3pm
So I think its there, right? I see no hits on this though and I have a
large amount of traffic on this box, 600+ email users. Any idea what I have
set wrong?
Matt
, 2005, 6:01:28 PM, Matt Matt wrote:
I have SpamAssassin 3.0.2 installed on Fedora Core 2 release. How do I
get
URIBL_SBL to work?
I see in "25_uribl.cf":
# Requires the Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL plugin be loaded.
# Note that this plugin defines a new config setting, 'uri
ow?
Thanks.
Matthew
From: Matt
Subject: URIBL_SBL
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 00:19:44 -0600
I just installed the latest version of 0.48 Net::DNS and still no go.
This is how I start Spamd in rc.local.
/usr/bin/spamd -d -c -m 5
This is running under Exim Exiscan. Looks like it uses spamc -u to connec
Works now.
Thanks.
Matt
Matt
install Net::DNS from CPAN
perl -MCPAN -eshell
install Net::DNS
the RH RPMs are nortious at sticking stuff in stupid places that only
other RH RPM based packages can see.
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
Matt
Ahh ha! Got it.. it seems to be domains that either the name servers
are not responding.. or the domain doesn't exist yet.. for instance:
debug: DNS MX records found: 0
Is there anyway to get around this? It seems to hang and do this
twice for long enough to delay the system... any thoughts?
Ok that works great if you KNOW the domain.. but what do you do when
this happens once every 3 or 4 days to random domains?
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 20:30:18 +0100, Chr. von Stuckrad
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 01:47:12PM -0500, Matt wrote:
> > Ahh ha! Got it..
Hi,
Is there anyway with spamassassin to have it use settings that users's
have set on mail servers where the user's accounts are virtual?
Has anyone noticed lately a higher then normal amount of porn spam
getting through?I've seen alot of it that seems to be hitting the
customer base as of late.. marked only by the SURBL... but those that
aren't SURBLed yet.. get through with a score of like 2.3
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hrmm well that could do it:
pts rule name description
-- --
1.3 SARE_HOUSEWIVESBODY: Mentions housewives, as in porn or in-home biz
0.8 HTML_30_40 BODY: Message is 30% to 40% HTML
0.0 HTML
As just an aside.. has anyone noticed a more massive amount of spam
lately then normal? Seems in gmail as well as my ISP I am logging a
whole lot more spam then normal.
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:10:16 -0500, Chris Santerre
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Has anyone noticed lately a higher then nor
wide setup, but rather would like to do it on a per-user
basis.
Any thoughts?
~ Matt
What do I have to do to get spamassassin to use a global bayes
database for all users on the system, rather then per user?
I'm tyring to use a global bayes database... but when user's try to
feed it spam a nd ham with sa-learn it does the following... right now
I even have the bayes directory set 777 just to debug.. what am I
doing wrong?
debug: Score set 0 chosen.
debug: running in taint mode? yes
debug: Running in t
have these addresses cover all domains and users on the
server. Is that possible?
Thanks
Matt
iveness of Spamassassin?
Thanks.
Matt
to test how well my spam scanning is working. Seems strange after even
being completely dead for several years the crap keeps coming. It has not
even been used as a real email address in likely over 4 years.
Matt
500 spams/day?!
Wow.
I've had this address for something like 7 years. I
extra rules from www.rulesemporium.com/rules, auto updated with
rules_du_jour.
make sure the surbl URI-RBL's are active.
They are. Which rule sets should I choose from those below? This domain is
for a small ISP so has a diversity of users.
Thanks.
Matt
# Here are some of the rul
in /etc/init.d/ that would support just doing
"spamd start" and "spamd restart", etc? Where can I find a copy if so?
Thanks.
Matt
c.d/init.d entry for starting
and stopping spamd using the "service" script as with "service spamassassin
restart".
None on mine.
Otherwise you have to use kill and the command below.
So:
/usr/bin/spamd -d -c -m 5 -r /var/run/spamd.pid
Do I need to invoke it like that so I can kill
d. please rerun with debug enabled for more
information.
I understand it is due to SA 3.0.2 no longer supporting "rewrite_subject 0".
Question is how do I fix it?
Matt
lost
some setting? February 12 seems to be about the last day they worked. At
least I see no more URIBL in SPAM headers anymore. Any ideas?
Thanks.
Matt
If SURBLs are active you should be detecting at least 90% of
spams (more like 99+%). The rules above are SARE rules, not
SURBL ones, BTW
rt" then it all
works.
Whats the deal, any ideas? For now I have added a spamd restart to
cron.daily just in case.
THanks.
Matt
If SURBLs are active you should be detecting at least 90% of
spams (more like 99+%). The rules above are SARE rules, not
SURBL ones, BTW.
In order to use SUR
This server connects to the Internet through an AT&T managed Cisco 3640 so
the network should be up instantly. Although it runs as its own DNS server.
Perhaps named is not fully up when SPMAD starts?
Is there something like "cron.fiveminutesafterbootup" that I can do a spamd
res
Thanks. That fixed all my troubles!
Matt
I'd just add...
dns_available yes
...to your local.cf file.
This server connects to the Internet through an AT&T managed Cisco 3640
so the network should be up instantly. Although it runs as its own DNS
server. Perhaps named is not fully up w
"blacklist_to" appears to add 10 points to spam score. I would like to
change it so it adds 20 points. How would I do that? Reason being that way
"blacklist_to" messages will always be scored high enough to trigger them to
be bayes auto_learn spam.
Matt
Add th
That worked but your right it has no effect on the autolearn=spam. Any idea
how I get it to autolearn all email to a given address as spam?
Matt
score USER_IN_BLACKLIST_TO 100.0
or whatever score you want
Dunno if the bayes auto-learner works with blacklist_to rules; it doesn't
work with
Does anyone know the logic behind this spam bombing? I have a friend
who has a gmx.de account and he has gotten 0 german spam in it... yet
here in the u.s. we are getting bombarded by the spam.
I am getting this continuously in my maillog log file running exim and sa.
dccproc[18723]: open(/var/dcc/map): Permission denied
I have DCC installed.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -qa | grep dcc -i
dcc-1.3.57-0.rhel4
Any idea what is wrong?
Matt
le
> Show the settings regarding dcc in your local.cf?
Nothing regarding dcc in local.cf.
Matt
server and does not appear to
> come from a dynamic address.
If you use smtp.comcast.net as outgoing I doubt you even need reverse
DNS on your IP. Just be sure you update your SPF record to include
smtp.comcast.net or something. Everyone has an SPF record, right?
Matt
~all"
But not sure. You need to look at all the mail coming out from your
server flowing through smtp.comcast.net and see that its source is
always one of the a record IP's for smtp.comcast.net.
Matt
n about blocking there
email. This server works in an ISP setting so must deal with 1500+
unique custommers who have differing ideas on how there email should
be filtered. I just add headers and knock priority on hits to low so
they can filter easilly with OE or there email client of choice.
Matt
I have a file on my server that contains a list of IP's that have
successfully authenticated to my server with POP3.
/etc/virtual/pophosts
Its updated on the fly by popb4smtp. I would like spamassassin to
treat all the IP's in this file as trusted networks on the fly.
Anyway to do that?
Matt
tc doesnt seem to
> work
Try posting to alt.test and other newsgroups. Look at spam you
receive for removal form links. Google for more spamtrap info.
Matt
? The RDNS_DYNAMIC
worries me a bit since I know a few email servers hosted on dynamic
looking reverse DNS's.
Matt
> Is anyone else having issues sending mail to Yahoo?
Yes. I have heard using Domainkeys or DKIM helps greatly? Is that
true? We have not implemented it yet but do use SPF records which are
much easier to implement with Exim or any MTA and do mostly the same
thing if you ask me.
Matt
MTA says
helo this [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thats what SPF looks
at. The MTA then adds that as the return path to the headers.
>>Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
That return path looks flaky. I would think spamassassin would have
some way of since its not a valid domain consider it suspect. Not
sure though.
Matt
= 10s
log_message = Sender $sender_address rate $sender_rate /
$sender_rate_period excedes limit delayed 10 seconds
It does not work as well when using webmail since messages all appear
to come from 127.0.0.1. I did find a plugin for Squirrelmail that
limits max recipients and messages sent
's in that
file? Right now I have it setup in Exim to just not scan messages
from those IP's but I think it would be better to scan and whitelist
them that way bayes would have more good messages to learn from. Or
will it help bayes any? If not I'll just leave it the way it is.
Matt
you/your
> clients to use standard SMTP authentication
This seemed like a great solution but naturally did not work. My
popb4smtp database is just a flat file that contains IP addresses.
POPAuthPlugin wants a "access.db style hash file" which I do not have.
Any fix for that?
Matt
How do I unsubscribe from here? There are no unsubscribe links at the
bottom of these messages.
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Caleb Cushing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> the attached email is one of the mails that keeps slipping through.
>
> I have no idea what it says, or why it continues to s
It seems the spammers have gotten smart to the fact that we were
filtering for one large image and no text... now what I am seeing is
that the spammers are sending many small images inline with the
e-mails!But, I have yet to see a way to filter against this. Any
thoughts?
On 6/21/06, Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ditto... having the same problem.
Here are the headers from one.. it got only a 2.0!
Is there somethign I can do to just block any inline images?
C{UT}
Received: from ntmail2.shscares.org (10.193.16.28 [10.193.16.28]) by
ntmail1.shscares.or
Hi,
What would I need to do to just outright block all e-mail that has an
inline gif or jpg (or multiple ones)?
: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 08:09
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Blocking all inline GIF or JPG Images
>
> From: "Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Hi,
> > What would I need to do to just outright block all e-mail
> that has an
> > i
An inline gif is INLINE with HTML.. an attached GIF is attached to the
message and the message is in MIME-text format. HTML does not belong
in e-mails.
On 6/27/06, Stuart Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Matt wrote:
> 1 - No legit e-mail should have in-line gifs.. they should be
Just to clarify here You are talking about doing something like:
domain.com 1200 IN MX 10 smtp-1.domain.com
domain.com 1200 IN MX50 smtp-2.domain.com
You all are saying that most of the spam should be coming in MX 50 right?
I have to admit I've tried this, but it seems l
We tried that and had problems with some clients (the business client
not the mail client). Seems a lot of Exchange servers will try the
lowest priority MX for some reason, and then never try the highest, just
fail.
With the current setup a valid message will eventually get through.
DAve
Isn't
I just upgraded to the new spamassassin:
SpamAssassin version 3.1.0
running on Perl version 5.6.1
Every hour or so spamd is dieing I ran it in debug mode and got
this when it died... can anyone explain what is going on, or point me
where to look for more info?
[19863] warn: prefork: select
Using Ratelimit in Exim MTA and plugin "Restrict Senders" in
Squirrelmail slows them down. Spammers need to send out large number
of messages to get any payback. Limiting the number they can send
with a compromised account really makes that account of no value to
them.
Matt
On Sun, M
user11m38.879s
sys 0m37.250s
matt
RobertH wrote:
matt,
wouldnt deleting the ~./spamassassin folder also delete the bayes data in
many circumstances?
Yes this would - this was purely for testing purposes - as Justin said
in a previous email some information is cached in that folder so I
deleted it to make sure that it
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Would constructing it using a binary (or n-ary, with small upper bound
of n) tree speed the compilation up?
Err, Matt, just had a very brief look at the code and the resulting
metas, but -- how is that different? :)
The result is exactly the tree
pdate channel for this for some time
the details are on Julian Field's blog (he wrote a script to do what
Regexp::Assemble does)
http://www.jules.fm/Logbook/files/anti-spear-phishing.html
matt
ounts.....
matt
http://www.backscatterer.org/
May help.
Here's another e-mail that got through SpamAssassin:
>
> http://rafb.net/p/cFMnIy61.html
>
> As you can see I've effectively disabled the BAYES_00 rule as it's giving
> false credit to a ton of backscatter crud messages, but is there really a
> way to bloc
Is there a reason the Barracuda blacklist is not in the official checks by
Spamassassin yet? I keep thinking sometime "sa-update -D" will add it but
have yet to see it.
Matt
7;t seen anyone else mention this I am thinking maybe
I need to update something, although I am not sure what.
Matt
--
GnuPG Key ID: 0xC33BD882
aim: beyondzero123 yahoo msg: beyondzero123
I do not want to die without any scars.
-Tyler Durden
1 - 100 of 3234 matches
Mail list logo
