Right.. and rightly they are.. What I'm wondering is.. is there anyway to get spamassassin to detect characteristics of these spams so as to mark them when we are the 'first hit' before they get into the SURBLs... obviously someone has to be first, so spamassassin may not mark them as spam. That's what I'm getting at. Once they get into SURBLs they work (and wonderfully I might add), but for that brief time period when we seem to get hammered with spams that seems to be BEFORE they are in the SURBLs, are there any rulesets, etc that might help spamassassin with the detection of these 'image' only spams?
On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 05:13:35 -0800, Jeff Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday, November 3, 2004, 5:09:24 AM, Matt Matt wrote: > > I'll be more then h appy to report them, but is there anything we can > > do to get spamassassin to detect them more? > > I'm not sure I understand what you mean by more. If they get > into SURBLs, they will be detected by SpamAssassin installations > with SURBLs active. > > > > Jeff C. > -- > Jeff Chan > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.surbl.org/ > >
