Hello asimhafeez,
Monday, June 6, 2011, 10:10:55 AM, you wrote:
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>>
>>> > On Sun, 5 Jun 2011 07:00:02 -0700 (PDT), asimhafeez
>>>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >> Is there any possibility to delete spam instead of marking (rewriting)
>>> >> the
>>> >> emails as [SPAM] in su
Tuesday, June 7, 2011, 1:36:24 AM, Matus wrote:
> Postfix can't use spamassassin directly, you _need_ to use something
> and that somethink
FYI: You can pipe to SpamAssassin directly from Postfix:
master.cf:
...
spamass unix - n n - 15 pipe
user=spamd argv=/usr/
Friday, June 24, 2011, 7:21:09 AM, you wrote:
> I am the official port maintainer for the Freebsd port for SpamAssassin.
> I have uploaded a test port for anyone who wants to try it.
> http://www.secnap.com/downloads/sa332_unofficial.tgz
> to install and compile:
> cd /(your ports dir: /usr/ports
Wednesday, July 13, 2011, 1:23:51 AM, Kristian wrote:
> Hello im using spamassassin and user prefs in mysql database, i have
> successfully setting up mysql table and all about correct work of
> squirelmail plugin and from client site everything is ok. The problem is
> spamassassin can't handle us
Wednesday, July 13, 2011, 3:14:53 AM, Kristian wrote:
> Is it nessacary needed? When i start spamd in debug mode saw the
> /usr/share/spamassassin/10_default_prefs.cf is proceeded.
You shouldn't make any changes in the /usr/share/spamassassin
directory as they could be overwritten when you upgrad
Hello Michael,
Monday, July 25, 2011, 9:30:11 AM, you wrote:
> On 7/25/11 10:24 AM, Jason Ede wrote:
>>
>> We’ve 2 reasonably powerful mail servers handling incoming email and
>> sharing the load. We’ve moved to a single bayes database (to make
>> training easier) and its stored in mariadb and
Monday, July 25, 2011, 1:16:54 PM, you wrote:
> On 7/25/11 2:13 PM, Duane Hill wrote:
>> Should this even be an issue if one is using an SQL backend and has it
>> configured to handle the extra processing? The OP is using MySQL as
>> the backend. I've had MySQL config
Monday, July 25, 2011, 1:26:22 PM, you wrote:
> On 7/25/11 2:24 PM, Duane Hill wrote:
>> Monday, July 25, 2011, 1:16:54 PM, you wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/25/11 2:13 PM, Duane Hill wrote:
>>>> Should this even be an issue if one is using an SQL backend and has it
Hello David,
Wednesday, August 3, 2011, 2:23:28 PM, you wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Aug 2011 21:15:16 +0200
> "Giampaolo Tomassoni" wrote:
>> > Except that in real life, the write transaction lasts much longer,
>> What is it? 60ms? Granted. It is still a 1/100 of 6s.
> No, write transactions are expens
Wednesday, August 3, 2011, 3:58:28 PM, you wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Duane Hill [mailto:du...@duanemail.org]
>>
>> Hello David,
>>
>> Wednesday, August 3, 2011, 2:23:28 PM, you wrote:
>>
>> I set MySQL to log all SQL queries.
Hello Giampaolo,
Wednesday, August 3, 2011, 4:09:57 PM, you wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Duane Hill [mailto:du...@duanemail.org]
>>
>> Wednesday, August 3, 2011, 3:58:28 PM, you wrote:
>>
>> >> -----Original Message-
>>
Friday, August 5, 2011, 7:48:09 AM, you wrote:
> Been getting a LOT of Chinese language spam lately with Chinese named
> attached spreadsheets or .doc files.
> Anyone else seeing this?
Yeah. And it's nice to see SA has not missed one yet that has made it
through ClamAV.
--
Best regards,
Duan
Friday, August 5, 2011, 11:08:29 AM, you wrote:
> Most seem to get through for me. What are you doing to catch them?
> I added this too local.conf and it did not help at all:
> #ok_languages en es fr de cs da lv nl pl sv
> ok_languages en
> TextCat appears to be enabled in v310.pre:
> # TextC
Friday, August 5, 2011, 12:54:35 PM, you wrote:
>> Most here score along this:
>>
>> X-Spam-Status: Reqd:5.0 Hits:14.6 Tests:BODY_8BITS=1.5
>> CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2 HTML_MESSAGE=0.001
>> MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45
>> MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.105 MISSING_HEADERS=1.207 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEX
Friday, August 5, 2011, 11:01:04 PM, Anil wrote:
> I am using sun (oracle) messaging server.
> Anyone have an idea for this?
The report_safe config option tells SA what type of reporting is to be
used:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.3.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html#report_safe
> On Th
On Tuesday, December 20, 2011 at 15:26:06 UTC, bowie_bai...@buc.com
confabulated:
> On 12/19/2011 4:03 AM, Jonas wrote:
I've never seen spam larger than 3 MB.
>>> which is much bigger than the 256 kB limit in sa-learn that the OP is
>>> having a
>>> problem with.
>> Indeed, of course I agre
On Tuesday, December 20, 2011 at 17:06:36 UTC, rwmailli...@googlemail.com
confabulated:
> On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:38:58 +
> Duane Hill wrote:
>> On Tuesday, December 20, 2011 at 15:26:06 UTC, bowie_bai...@buc.com
>> confabulated:
>>
>> >> Should I ope
On Tuesday, February 21, 2012 at 15:18:30 UTC, michael.scheid...@secnap.com
confabulated:
> On 2/21/12 10:11 AM, Antonio Gutiérrez Mayoral wrote:
>> rule AWL is triggered with a negative score. Reading the documentation
>> I think that the problem
>> was a wrong auto-learn thresold for HAM, the
On Tuesday, February 21, 2012 at 21:25:08 UTC, michael.scheid...@secnap.com
confabulated:
> On 2/21/12 4:09 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>> Den 2012-02-21 16:29, Duane Hill skrev:
>>
>>>
>>> http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.3.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_AW
ES_50=0.001,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001
> :??
Did you disable (comment out) the AWL line in the config file
v310.pre?
> 2012/2/21 Duane Hill
>> On Tuesday, February 21, 2012 at 15:18:30 UTC,
>> michael.scheid...@secnap.com confabulated:
>>
>> > On 2/21/12 10:11 AM, Anto
erriding this setting?
> Thank you!
I forgot you are using amavisd. Amavisd doesn't use SA's spamd. You
have to restart amavisd whenever you make changes.
> 2012/2/22 Duane Hill
>> On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 at 12:36:31 UTC,
>> agutierr@gmail.comco
On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 at 02:48:08 UTC, jer...@fluxlabs.net confabulated:
> Sa-update should reload SA, therefore reloading rules. What error are you
> getting ?
You have to reload spamd after sa-update if any rules were updated to
activate the changes.
> --
> Jeremy McSpadden
> On Mar 26
On Friday, May 25, 2012 at 21:26:45 UTC, jida...@jidanni.org confabulated:
> Isn't it bad that X-Spam-Checker-Version doesn't report what sa-update
> we are up to so far, and that there is no additional other variable that
> we can toggle on in reports to do that.
The version header shows the ve
On Saturday, June 30, 2012 at 11:00:54 UTC, mar...@gregorie.org confabulated:
> On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 22:48 -0700, Jayanta Ghosh wrote:
>> Dear List,
>>
>> We are trying to configure Spamassassin (Version 3.3.1-2) with postfix
>> (Version 2.6.6-2.1) on RHEL 6.1 (64 bit). In order to integrate pos
Try your testing from somewhere else. Your test appears to have been
performed from the server itself. Your logs below show ALL_TRUSTED in
the spamassassin results.
On Saturday, June 30, 2012 at 05:48:15 UTC, jayanta.gh...@rp-sg.in confabulated:
> Dear List,
> We are trying to configure Spama
On Friday, October 19, 2012 at 20:21:13 UTC, t...@ipinc.net confabulated:
> Hi All,
>Last month I put in a new mailserver, here are the specs:
> FreeBSD 8.3 amd64bit
> 8GB ram
> 2TB mirrored disk space
> dual Xeon E5310s
> Intel motherboard
> top output:
> last pid: 82946; load averages:
Monday, January 6, 2014, 3:14:56 PM, you wrote:
> On 06.01.14 09:02, Mark Chaney wrote:
>>I sure I hope I didnt fail to bad on searching for this answer, but
>>when simply using spamassasin with postfix as an incoming smtp relay
>>server and not using anything like amavis or mailscanner, is ther
else
exit 0
fi
This way, sa-compile is ran and spamd is restarted only when there is
an update. I then use the script in a cron which runs once per day.
I believe the way you have it, spamd will get restarted every time
your cron is ran whether there is an update or not.
--
Duane Hil
On Wednesday, October 8, 2014, 3:11:06 PM, LuKreme wrote:
>> On 08 Oct 2014, at 04:56 , Duane Hill wrote:
>>
>> On Tuesday, October 7, 2014, 10:56:54 PM, LuKreme wrote:
>>
>>> On 07 Oct 2014, at 11:45 , Jari Fredrisson wrote:
>>>> I ran sa-update &
On Wednesday, October 8, 2014, 5:31:07 PM, Dave wrote:
> On 2014-10-08 15:23, Duane Hill wrote:
>> No. && is a way of chaining commands together. Your cron says run
>> sa-update and then restart spamd. In other words, when sa-update
>> finishes running,
On Wednesday, October 8, 2014, 5:38:20 PM, John wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Oct 2014, Duane Hill wrote:
>> No. && is a way of chaining commands together.
> ...where the second command is only executed if the first command exited
> with a zero status. && stops on failur
On Wednesday, October 8, 2014, 6:31:08 PM, Martin confabulated:
> On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 16:46 -0600, Amir Caspi wrote:
>> On Oct 8, 2014, at 4:23 PM, Duane Hill wrote:
>> >
>> > No. && is a way of chaining commands together. Your cron says run
>&g
ar for examples).
>
Have you confirmed in your server logs the message was received by the
SA server? If so, there would have been a message coming back to your
server shortly thereafter.
I just sent an unsubscribe request:
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 21:03:35 -0500
From: Duane Hill
l the subjects.
Check out
https://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.3.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html#basic_message_tagging_options
--
Best regards,
Duane Hill
sage as
> non-spam and then ham a few minutes later? As I understand it you do not
> need to explicitly --forget, SpamAssassin is smart enough to handle this
> situation, no? And if so, learning your Inbox should be fine as long as
> you move messages to Spam (and don't just delete) when appropriate.
non-spam and ham are the exact same. Therefore, it would not make any
difference. According to documentation, the --ham switch means to learn as ham
(non-spam). Therefore, the same thing.
--
Best regards,
Duane Hill
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 at 17:02 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
You need to find the source rules and set them to zero, ala:
$ grep spamhaus.org
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.001008/updates_spamassassin_org/*.cf | awk '/check_rbl/
{ print $2 }'
__RCVD_IN_ZEN
RCVD_IN_XBL
RCVD_IN_PBL
Set those s
Never mind. I understand. Set the scores to zero within local.cf. Forgive
the noise.
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 at 02:07 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 at 17:02 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
You need to find the source rules and set them to zero, ala:
$ grep
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 at 13:08 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
also sprach Jeff Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.08.16.1125 +0200]:
The two do very different things. MTA blacklists are direct
rejection of incoming smtp connections by the MTA (in this case
postfix). URIDNSBL is a SpamAssass
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 at 21:37 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
I start spamd like this:
/usr/bin/spamd -r /var/run/spamd.pid \
-d --username=defang --max-spare=8 --min-children=10 --max-children=45
I'll try some of those params. Certainly, i should bump up the max-children
from 5 and s
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 at 13:02 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
Hm. This is the first I've heard of the chickenpox rule. Where does it come
from? Is it part of SARE?
They can be found here:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/other-rules.htm
They haven't been updated in what looks to be
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 at 16:24 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Eric A. Hall wrote:
On 8/16/2007 12:39 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
OK - it's interesting that of all of you who responded this is the only
person who is doing it right. I have to say that I'm somewhat surpris
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 at 09:33 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
You're doing a LOT better than I am with it. Makes me wonder if I have
something set up wrong. My main SA server has a fast dual core Athlon
and 8 gigs of ram and it can get bogged down rather quickly. I wonder if
I'm doing some
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 at 11:03 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
On Aug 21, 2007, at 8:28 AM, Duane Hill wrote:
I have seen the suggestion recently in this thread to run SA from a ram
drive. I am going to experiment with that over the course of this next
weekend. I'm not quiet sur
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 at 11:31 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
On Aug 21, 2007, at 11:17 AM, Duane Hill wrote:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 at 11:03 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
It seems to mostly help when it drops the message into a file for clamav
to scan.
Is that using the ClamAV
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 at 17:43 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
On Aug 21, 2007, at 11:48 AM, Duane Hill wrote:
Ok. I just examined the clamav.pm plugin and it does appear to pass the
message text directly to the ClamAV daemon through the use of the
File::Scan::ClamAV perl module
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 at 10:21 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
Hi all,
Having problems getting PDFInfo to load.
Basic machine info:
Sun Solaris 5.9
perl v5.8.9
spamassassin v3.2.2
PDFInfo v0.8
init.pre entry: loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 at 13:08 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
Further, how does check_sender_mx_access differ from Sender Address
Verification (SAV)? (where SAV is an INCREDIBLY bad idea, and a blight upon
the internet)
(meaning: if check_sender_mx_access is just the postfix name for SA
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 at 13:42 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
Duane Hill wrote:
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 at 13:08 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
Further, how does check_sender_mx_access differ from Sender Address
Verification (SAV)? (where SAV is an INCREDIBLY bad idea, and a blight
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 at 10:38 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
We have been running our service for almost 5 years and this problem
started
with this ISP client of yours (TELEBEC) last week after they upgraded
their
servers to the latest version of SPAMASSASSIN I'm told. We are now be
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 at 10:26 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
I've developed an extremely accurate of detecting virus infected spam
zombies. I think it's 100% accurate can catches them on the first try. Here
You think it's 100% accurate? What about the systems that have been
cleaned up?
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 at 08:40 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
Jason Bertoch wrote:
On Tuesday, September 11, 2007 7:07 PM Marc Perkel wrote:
The details are a little to complex for this forum ...
OK - had quite a few trolls here who seem to be hostile to my
breakthroughs so I wasn't th
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 at 13:32 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
I'm happy to announce that we have won an InfoWorld "Best Of Open Source
Software" BOSSIE Award, as the winner in the anti-spam category for 2007!
more info here:
http://www.infoworld.com/archives/t.jsp?N=s&V=91650
Awesome!
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 at 13:09 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
Hi!
I have a problem with SpamAssassin and the bayes database files. These
files, and users' messages too, are stored in a external SAN. This SAN
have a high use, and sometimes some users' bayes files are been corrupted.
If I
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 at 15:23 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 02:11:19PM -0700, mfahey wrote:
SpamAssassin-3.2.0
Freebsd6.2
The file bayes_seen has grown in size to 256GB! (274992939008)
How do I cap the size limit of this file? I want to have it not grow larger
We now subscribe to the Spamhaus datafeed service. Being the zones are now
running locally under the name zen.dnsbl, I have to rewrite some of the
rules in SA. Do I just have to rewrite the relevant parts? I.e.:
Instead of:
header __RCVD_IN_ZENeval:check_rbl('zen', 'zen.spamhaus.org.')
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 at 11:01 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
Duane Hill wrote:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 at 10:37 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
On Sep 28, 2007, at 10:14 AM, Duane Hill wrote:
We now subscribe to the Spamhaus datafeed service. Being the zones are
now running
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 at 10:37 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
On Sep 28, 2007, at 10:14 AM, Duane Hill wrote:
We now subscribe to the Spamhaus datafeed service. Being the zones are now
running locally under the name zen.dnsbl, I have to rewrite some of the
rules in SA. Do I just have
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 at 21:57 +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
Micah Anderson schrieb am 27.09.2007 02:20:
processing has ground down to really slow. I'm seeing
some incredibly long queries now in my slow-query log,
such as:
Try an "optimize table " for each of the sa
tables. You just f
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007 at 00:34 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
My mail client doesn't seem to be able to get to my spamassassin
server. When I "telnet 783" from the client, I get:
Trying ...
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused
I can telnet to localh
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 07:35:13 -0500
Daniel J McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> confabulated:
> On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 08:16 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> > Justin Mason wrote:
> > >
> > > What else can we do?
> > >
> > Add code to generate a lint warning any time a .cf file over 1mb is
> > read unless
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 09:43:37 -0700 (PPT)
"John D. Hardin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> confabulated:
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, Duane Hill wrote:
>
> > > But people don't read logs, or they would know... I'd suggest
> > > die-ing instead.
> >
> >
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 02:04:31 -0400
Payne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> confabulated:
> Guys,
>
> How can I fix this?
>
> error: Can't locate Sys/Syslog/Win32.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i586-linux-thread-multi
> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8
> /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 06:49:25 -0700 (PDT)
xou4 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> confabulated:
>
> Hello,
>
> I want to remove the mails on which a score above 30
>
> Thank you in advance for your help
>
> Xou
Your email server software (MTA) has to do that. SpamAssassin just
scans what you feed it. It d
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:00:52 +0100
Matthias Haegele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> confabulated:
> Matthias Haegele schrieb:
> > xou4 schrieb:
> >> Hello,
> >> I want to remove the mails on which a score above 30
> >> Thank you in advance for your help
> >
> > spamassassin "tags" messages whatever "filter"
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:43:44 +
"Qnet .." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> confabulated:
> Hi Guys,
> I'm running a Qmail server with spamassassin + clamav + Simscam.
> The server i'm using is a HP ML110 CPU PIV (3.2 GHZ) 2mb chache , 1GB
> RAM.
>
> The problem is, the i'm getting very high load because sp
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 06:59:18 -0800 (PST)
claym <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm having a weird issue while running sa-compile via a cron job.
>
> This is the command I'm issuing:
>
> PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/src/bin; sa-compile
>
> This is the error:
>
> /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.8 Ma
I know if there is a misconfiguration in one of the config files SA will
usually skip it and keep running.
Does the same hold true for extraneous data within the userpref SQL
table? I have a custom Postfix policy and would rather use the existing
userpref table than to create an additional table
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 20:24:07 +0100
"Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone know if there's a way to score *all* emails at the server
> with scores from 0-100, then delete all emails at the server with
> scores of over 10 and deliver the rest with the scores in the subject
> title please ?
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 19:04:46 -0500
Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Duane Hill wrote:
> > I know if there is a misconfiguration in one of the config files SA
> > will usually skip it and keep running.
> >
>
> Well, it might.. It will essentially sta
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 12:12:27 +
Steve Freegard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Loren Wilton wrote:
> > X-SpamFilter-By: BOX Solutions SpamTrap 1.1 with qID
> > lBDNlb6m031347, This message is to be blocked by code: bkndr63272
> > Subject: [Spam-Mail] We invite you to join us as a Silver
> > PowerS
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 09:03:05 -0500
Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The Bat! isn't a mass-emailing application.
And frankly, I'm miffed that iowatelecom.net flat out rejects messages
with the X-Mailer set to The Bat!
--
_|_
(_| |
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 08:53:13 -0500
"Ken Morley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm using Postfix 2.4.6, Amavisd-new 2.5.2, ClamAV 0.91.2 and
> Mail-SpamAssassin 3.2.3 in a Linux mail filter.
>
> As I recall, SA used to have some rules that penalized e-mail
> originating from mass-emailing applic
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008 23:31:00 -0800
Noah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> how do I track down and correct the following error. I have
> spamassassin install on a FreeBSD machine.
>
> Jan 7 23:29:26 typhoon spamd[62450]: spamd: still running as root:
> user not specified with -u, n
On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 09:20:26 +0100
Per Jessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>
> > Well, the problem is that if you run at MTA time, you can't really
> > do per-user configs.
> >
> > "spamc -u" will work, if there's only 1 user. it won't work with
> > multiple users, such a
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 04:56:57 +0200
"Jari Fredriksson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
>
>
> My /etc/spamassassin/channels.txt:
>
> --(8<)
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 19:51:03 -0500
Robert Fitzpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have some users getting slammed with this spam. Before I start
> trying to figure out how to intercept, can someone test this message
> and tell me if your getting a score above 5.0?
>
> http://esmtp.webtent.net/
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 20:22:59 -0500
Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 07:51:03PM -0500, Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
> > I have some users getting slammed with this spam. Before I start
> > trying to figure out how to intercept, can someone test this
> > message and
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 10:18:34 -0500
"Patrick Sherrill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any clues?
Did you perhaps change the template in the core file
10_default_prefs.cf? An update would have overwritten any changes. If
so, you should place the updated template in the local.cf where it will
not get o
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:52:01 +0200
"Jari Fredriksson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> 100% of the non-English email we're getting is spam, so
> >>> I added this to my local.cf file:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ok_languages en
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> However, I can't see that it's having any effect at all.
>
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 17:34:09 -0800
Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any place to easily query whois information to determine on
> a mass scale how old a domain is?
Don't know myself. All I can say is don't query whois on Network
Solutions for possible availability of a domain to
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:21:53 -0800
"Bazooka Joe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I too am getting dozens of these emails that are going right through
> SA + pyzor + dcc. sa-learn doesn't seem to make any difference. I
> just installed razor2 today to try to combat real men.
>
> Most get through w/
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:25:41 -0500 (EST)
Andy Dills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It appears (from email recently sent to the admins of a few small
> mailservers I help admin) that the people in charge of uribl.com have
> decided to set a pretty low threshold for blacklisting DNS servers
> fro
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:02:11 -0800
Bob Amen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Scheidell wrote:
> > >Works fine for me. Are you sure you weren't blocked?
> >
> >
> > In fact, I found several sites (different networks, not mine) where
> > it doesn't work.
> > (I don't query more than 10,000
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:02:11 -0800
Bob Amen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Scheidell wrote:
> > >Works fine for me. Are you sure you weren't blocked?
> >
> >
> > In fact, I found several sites (different networks, not mine) where
> > it doesn't work.
> > (I don't query more than 10,000
We have a 400 as well. I don't think one can even compare SA
out-of-the-box and the Barracuda. I'm catching more Spam with the use of
SA with no rules loaded than what our Barracuda is tagging. I've taken
messages that came off the Barracuda and thew it through SA. SA scored
almost 2.5 points h
Don't know if someone can point me in a direction to look or not. I'm
using SA through a third-party plugin for our MTA. This is running on
FreeBSD 6.0 with SA v3.1.1 on Perl v5.8.7.
As soon as I move aproximately 520K of rules into the directory with the
local.cf and restart the plugin, messa
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Chris Santerre wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Duane Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 9:16 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Loading Rules - Possible Memory Issue
Don't know if someone can point me in a direction to lo
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Craig McLean wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Duane Hill wrote:
[snippage]
I think what it boils down to is just getting carried away.
Thanks for the response. This is still relatively new with running our
MTA on FreeBSD. It was migrated away from
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Gary Forrest - Netnorth wrote:
Hi All
Has anyone else had this issue below
IP 209.237.227.199 appears listed within Spamhaus DNSBL
The IP number is listed as used by Apache Org in Arin whois DB
This is not the only list this has happened to. We are on a Qwest outage
no
On Mon, 17 Jul 2006, Ashok kumar wrote:
I want do disable all the checks related to SPAMCOP, for disabling the
checks i have hash the "loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SpamCop" line
in v310.pre file of spamassassin but still i am able to find the
"RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET" rulehit in
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006, Steven Stern wrote:
In our standard spam report, we have a line like
report For more info, see http://our.server/infopage.html
I'm adding content to the page and would like to add links to local anchors
report For more info, see http://our.server/infopage.html#anchor
It
I recently upgraded SA to v3.1.3 on FreeBSD 6.0. I have also ran
sa-update.
I have found that no matter what I do to the local.cf with turning off
bayes, it is still being used. I have searched the system over and have
only found local.cf contained within /etc/mail/spamassassin.
Any ideas?
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Duane Hill wrote:
I recently upgraded SA to v3.1.3 on FreeBSD 6.0. I have also ran
sa-update.
I have found that no matter what I do to the local.cf with turning off
bayes, it is still being used. I have searched the system over and
have only found
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006, Jim Maul wrote:
Duane Hill wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Duane Hill wrote:
I recently upgraded SA to v3.1.3 on FreeBSD 6.0. I have also ran
sa-update.
I have found that no matter what I do to the local.cf with turning off
bayes, it is still being used
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 01:16:01PM +, Duane Hill wrote:
local.cf.sample I would have found it. And, now that I think about it. I
do remember seeing a number of messages posted to this list that did state
the default is moved to /usr/local/etc
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006, Kevin Golding wrote:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, DAve
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
I really don't want to install X on my mailgateways. It would have to be
as good as URIBL and SURBL before I would consider that.
Is there a way around the dependencies? The FreeBSD port s
On Monday, August 28, 2006 at 7:53:40 AM, Whisky confabulated:
> There's a lot of spam lately, which contains urls with subdirectories, such
> as http://spamdomain.org/gal/ms/.
> I have thus set up the following rule:
> body BODY_ADDS_22
> /(\/za\/|\/wd\/|\/iu\/|\/xi\/|\/gal\|\/tx\/|\/nu\/)/i
On Friday, September 1, 2006 at 10:15:40 AM, Tom confabulated:
> Hi
> I sent a mail from my work account, which i have no control over, to my
> home account which i have full control over.
> I noticed that this check made up part of the score when it came in
> DNS_FROM_RFC_POST=1.708
> Can any
On Monday, September 4, 2006 at 6:13:50 AM, Ramprasad confabulated:
> Hi,
> All the LARGO tests and our own custom rules notwithstanding , some
> image spams still get thru.
> But spams like these are absolutely pointless.
> http://ecm.netcore.co.in/tmp/buildup.eml.txt
> I dont get any message
On Friday, September 8, 2006 at 3:40:06 PM, Bowie confabulated:
> Floyd wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am new to SpamAssassin, I have been testing it for about 3 to 4
>> weeks now and I have categorized about
>> 4000 ham and about 1000 spam, and I still get the same spam after a
>> few days.
>> What I am
1 - 100 of 321 matches
Mail list logo
