On 04/23/2014 04:42 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
If you run make distclean and then perl Makefile.PL and then make tardist, does
that
work?
I blew away the directory and untar'ed it again ... this time it didn't complain
about Config.pm.
/usr/local/home/david/work/Mail-SpamAssassin-
On 4/24/2014 12:36 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> Overall, it should let you know you can proceed.
Kevin:
Thanks for your help. Got the update installed & running fine now.
david
--
IBM i on Power Systems: For when you can't afford to be out of business!
I'm riding a metric century (100 km /
On 4/13/2018 8:40 AM, David Jones wrote:
P.S. I would love to help with any RBL/URIBLs with honeypot/spamtrap
accounts if anyone would like to contact me off list.
I have a few domains that I will _never_ receive email on ... I would like to
contribute too.
david
--
IBM i on Power Syste
On 11/21/2018 12:56 AM, @lbutlr wrote:
While updating spamassassin, several emails were destructive lost
because of the absence of spamc. To be fair, the date did get stuck
unexpectedly asking for a confirmation, but still I’d like to avoid
this happening again.
Maybe I'm missing something, but
OK, I'm confused.
I'm trying to get spamd to log to my maillog but can't figure out what's going
wrong.
I'm invoking spamd like this ...
/usr/bin/perl -T -w /usr/bin/spamd --syslog=mail -d -c -m5 -H
--razor-home-dir=/var/lib/razor/ --razor-log-file=sys-syslog -r /var/run/spamd.pid
I have t
On 1/10/19 6:03 PM, David Gibbs wrote:
I'm trying to get spamd to log to my maillog but can't figure out what's
going wrong.
Also, spamd is logging oddly even in the messages file...
Jan 10 18:11:32 listmail spamd[21867]: logger: removing stderr method
Jan 10 18:11:33 listm
On 1/10/2019 6:03 PM, David Gibbs wrote:
I'm trying to get spamd to log to my maillog but can't figure out
what's going wrong. Jan 10 17:43:01 listmail spamd[21503]: logger:
removing stderr method
I tried changing the syslog facility on spamd to local1 and the same
thing happe
I noticed the following errors showing up in my logs ...
Jan 18 08:36:12 listmail spamd[2800]: dns: bad dns reply: addr is not a string
at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/IO/Socket/IP.pm line 662, line 48.
I'm running ...
SpamAssassin version 3.4.2
running on Perl version 5.16.3
Any suggesti
On 7/3/19 7:54 AM, Riccardo Alfieri wrote:
apparently I missed to write on the documentation that you need also Perl's
List::MoreUtils installed.
And 'Data::Validate::Domain'.
david
--
IBM i on Power Systems: For when you can't afford to be out of business!
I'm riding 615 miles (Yes, you rea
On 7/3/19 11:24 AM, Riccardo Alfieri wrote:
And 'Data::Validate::Domain'.
That was for an older version of the plugin, it's now not needed anymore.
Get the code from the github repository to have the latest version.
I downloaded the version that was on the install page. It has a date tag o
I have a number of email addresses that get only spam, so I've set them
up as spamtraps.
They are simply sendmail aliases that send to "| /usr/bin/spamassassin -r".
When I manually run the spamassassin -r command, however, I get the
following...
$cat sample-spam.txt | spamassassin -r
Pyzor -> r
Any suggestions on how to activate the RelayCountry plug-in?
I've added this line to my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf file ...
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::RelayCountry
... and restarted spamd.
My messages, however, do not have any additional information that
indicates the country
Matt Kettler wrote:
I don't believe the RelayCountry plugin adds anything visible to the
message.
Ok, I didn't get that from the docs (such as they are). I expected the
"X-Relay-Countries" header to be added to the message.
It adds the country code to the metadata that gets used as bayes tokens
Folks:
I recently enabled rbl checks in my spamassassin configuration ...
skip_rbl_checks 0
After I did this, I noticed the following error showing up in my log ...
Oct 22 09:31:02 linux spamd[13465]: error: Insecure dependency in eval
while running setuid at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.
I just had some spam slip through ... I checked my maillog and saw the
following error that seems to be related to the spam message (using
msgid to correlate)...
Nov 7 20:24:02 linux spamd[18221]: error: Insecure dependency in eval
while running setuid at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/S
Any thoughts on this?
David Gibbs wrote:
Folks:
I recently enabled rbl checks in my spamassassin configuration ...
skip_rbl_checks 0
After I did this, I noticed the following error showing up in my log ...
Oct 22 09:31:02 linux spamd[13465]: error: Insecure dependency in eval
while
I'm getting a lot of spam slipping through SA 3.0.1 (on RH 8.0) and the
following message is getting logged about the same time:
Nov 15 14:24:28 linux spamd[17314]: error: Insecure dependency in eval
while running setuid at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm line
Folks:
Every now and then a obvious spam message slips by SA and, when I look
in the maillog for the message id that got past, I see the following ...
May 6 17:50:38 linux spamd[3396]: error: Insecure dependency in eval
while running setuid at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/Per
David Gibbs wrote:
> May 6 17:50:38 linux spamd[3396]: error: Insecure dependency in eval
> while running setuid at
> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm line
> 1958, line 57._ Transport endpoint is not connected, continuing
I ran spamd in debug mode
David Gibbs wrote:
> I ran spamd in debug mode for a while, hoping that I could catch one of
> the messages slipping by ... and I did.
Anyone?
This is happening more frequently ... and I can't find a pattern.
david
Justin Mason wrote:
Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.4 is now available! This is a maintenance
release of the 3.2.x branch.
I just updated to 2.3.4 ... but when I tried to run sa-compile, I got
the following error ...
--
[18717] info: generic: base extraction starting. this can take a while...
Justin Mason wrote:
oops, that looks like a bug. could you open an entry on
bugzilla.spamassassin.org?
Logged as #5769.
david
--
System i ... for when you can't afford to be out of business
mouss wrote:
uri GOOGLE_SEARCH_BTNIm{gooo?gle\..*/search.*btnI=}
Loose the last equals sign, I've seen similar samples come through
without it.
david
I was watching my maillog this morning, trying to spot something else
that wasn't quite working right when I noticed a bunch of errors similar
to the following:
Feb 19 11:09:26 rivendell spamd[987]: Subroutine
DEAR_SOMETHING_one_line_body_te
st redefined at
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.002004/upda
Any thoughts on this?
David Gibbs wrote:
I was watching my maillog this morning, trying to spot something else
that wasn't quite working right when I noticed a bunch of errors similar
to the following:
Feb 19 11:09:26 rivendell spamd[987]: Subroutine
DEAR_SOMETHING_one_line_body_
Does anyone know if there is a way to setup a sendmail alias (or
virtuser table entry) so that a message is received, filtered through
spamassassin, and then forwarded to another email address?
I've got some 'role' addresses I want to setup ... but really want to
flag spam as much as possible for
Justin Mason wrote:
> SpamAssassin 3.1.0-rc1 is released! SpamAssassin 3.1.0 is a major update.
> SpamAssassin is a mail filter which uses advanced statistical and
> heuristic tests to identify spam (also known as unsolicited bulk email).
Don't know if this is significant ...
When I ran perl Mak
Folks:
Does anyone know if there is a way to cause specific email addresses to
be excluded from AWL processing?
I run a number of mailing lists using mailman ... and I get a lot of
notification messages from the mailman-owner address. I also get a
rather significant amount of spam addressed to t
Folks:
This morning spamd shutdown for some reason ... I can't determine what
it might be.
The log showed this ...
Sep 30 07:28:54 linux spamd[15172]: Can't locate LMAP/CID2SPF.pm in @INC
(@INC contains: lib ../lib
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/i386-linux-thread-multi
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>>Sep 30 07:28:54 linux spamd[15172]: Can't locate LMAP/CID2SPF.pm in @INC
>>/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SPF/Query.pm line 1749,
> Mail::SPF::Query wants to use LMAP::CID2SPF, but you don't have it installed.
Yeah, I figured that ... it's now installed.
I'm still g
Chris wrote:
Oct 11 19:51:44 cpollock spamd[6762]: Can't locate LMAP/CID2SPF.pm in @INC
See http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4541#c5
Chris wrote:
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 09:14 pm, David Gibbs wrote:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4541#c5
Thanks David, I see that it only applies to Microsoft caller-id and not an
SA bug.
It relates to the missing perl module which is used by SPF, which is
used by
Folks:
I just got a message that was flagged as spam due to the URIBL_JP_SURBL
rule ... it matched on the URI 'range.com' ... my domain, midrange.com,
is what triggered it.
> 3.4 URIBL_JP_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the JP SURBL
> blocklist
>[URIs: range.co
Paul Benedict wrote:
I want to know if there is a Java interface into SpamAssassin?
Shouldn't be too difficult.
You can interact with spamd using TCP/IP.
Check out http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/dist/spamd/PROTOCOL
david
Michael Parker wrote:
> One interesting feature of the talk was the release of a plugin that
> handles persistent database connection in SpamAssassin. This is
> especially useful for folks using SQL for user preferences, AWL or
> Bayes. I invite everyone to try it out and provide lots of feedback
LuKreme wrote:
> The unsubscribe link is right there in plain sight. Whether Gmail
> conceals it from you has nothing to do with it.
Few consumer mail clients (Gmail, Yahoo, Thunderbird, OE, Outlook,
Lotus/Domino, etc) show the user headers by default. This means they are
clearly NOT in plain s
mouss wrote:
> - this modifies the body, thus breaking signatures. when mail gets back
> to the same domain (sender and final recipient in same domain), this may
> cause problems. I agree that many lists do break signatures so the
> receiving site should cope with this, but I am not sure they reall
mouss wrote:
> - mail admin at example.com configures his mail system to sign all
> outbound mail with DKIM
> - he rejects any mail with a From: in his domain if it doesn't have a
> valid DKIM signature
> - j...@example.com posts to a list that appends a footer (or munges the
> Reply-To header, ass
Bill Landry wrote:
> This may be true if the sender were adding the footer before signing and
> sending the message to the list. However, not true if it's the mailing
> list that is adding the footer after the original sender has already
> signed the message.
As I understand it, in order for the
mouss wrote:
>> Mailman has specific functionality to remove signature headers so
>> that the message can be resigned as it's sent out.
>
> which doesn't help, because if I get mail claiming to come "From:
> ", yet it doesn't have a sig of mine, I don't
> really care if some fancy mailman owner h
I'm trying to create a RPM for my Fedora 10 system and have encountered a
problem.
I run the command: rpmbuild -tb Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.5.tar.gz
It seems to run OK until this point ...
--
Requires(post): /bin/sh
Requires(preun): /bin/sh
Requires(postun): /bin/sh
Requires: /bin/sh /usr
Folks:
I'm trying to create a rule that are basically exclusive of each other.
That is ... if rule 1 is matched, then ignore rule 2.
My particular example ...
I want to create a rule that will assign a specific score if the subject
contains the word 'euromillion', but have a lower score if the
dny wrote:
> is there a way to setup apache to use spam assassin rule?
> so that apache will check first (dnsbl or some other way) if the
> posted content is spam or not?
Although not generic to apache in general, this is a Wordpress plug-in
that uses spamassassin to filter comments.
http://www.
Igor Chudov wrote:
> Here's something that I do not understand. What is the point of
> spamming people repeatedly not once, twice, or even 10 times, but
> hundreds of times. If I wanted to procure pils, or pgrn, or whatever,
> I would have done it on the first 10 spams. After 100 or so spams,
> wha
--[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
> Yes image spam can be a real pain.
While I agree that image spam is a PITA ... I have to wonder how ANYONE
in the right mind could fall for that garbage.
I mean, be real ... if the message you get contains an image, surrounded
by garbage text, and the image quality is wors
45 matches
Mail list logo
