Hello,
SpamAssassin version 3.4.6 With postfix 3.4.14 on debian 10.12
SpamAssassin version 3.4.2 With postfix 3.4.2 on debian 10.3
As it is written in the Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_URIDNSBL doc and confirmed by
some tests, when a check is done with uridnsbl, only the domain is requested
not the
2022 at 03:13:29PM +0000, DEMBLANS Mathieu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> SpamAssassin version 3.4.6 With postfix 3.4.14 on debian 10.12
>
> SpamAssassin version 3.4.2 With postfix 3.4.2 on debian 10.3
>
> As it is written in the Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_URIDNSBL doc and
> confirme
Hi,
If I understand well the configuration, the USER_IN_BLACKLIST_TO test doesn't
use the bayes autolearn system, am I right ?
If I am, how can I do if I want it to learn message that match this test ?
Force the tflag in local.cf ?
I use the USER_IN_BLACKLIST_TO as a kind of honeypot so all mail
Hi,
Anyone know if there is a way to request an external API throught a
spamsassassin plugin ?
It will be to search an URL extracted by SA from a body of a mail and check if
it's referenced with an API request on an external service (virustotal or
other).
We receive some mails with URL inside wh
Hello everyone,
I try to disable the dnsbl request done to spamhaus.org but the solutions I
found doesn't work.
I put
score RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS 0
score RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED 0
score __RCVD_IN_ZEN 0
in local.cf but spamassassin still do dns request to spamhaus.
Doing the same with spamcop (
.
Instead of that have constructive responses.
Clear informations are sometimes hard to find.
If you don’t wan to help, don’t respond.
De : Reindl Harald
Envoyé : jeudi 17 avril 2025 17:16
À : DEMBLANS Mathieu
Objet : Re: disable spamhaus request
and frankly: when you outright block based on
On 4/17/2025 4:40 PM, Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Apr 2025, DEMBLANS Mathieu wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the link, I will study that.
>> Our local nameserver DOESN’T USE shared/open nameservers, it transmit
>> to the good nameservers (for spamhaus, their NS).
>>
&g
