I have been considering converting from the default DBM format to
PostgreSQL when I ran across a few bugs (#6444) that are open addressing
possible performance issues with Bayes and PostgreSQL.
Would there be enough of a concern at this point to wait until some of
the proposed patches and bugs
On 10/13/2010 1:26 PM, Jason Bertoch wrote:
On 2010/10/13 12:25 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Hello,
I've received a spam that his both HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI and
RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED. I believe it's because both BSP and HABEAS were
bought
by ReturnPath Inc.
There's good info on these rule
Is there an available/preferred method to query for the most recent
released version of SpamAssassin?
I know there exists TXT records to for each version to maintain
sa-update based rules (i.e. 1.3.3.updates.spamassassin.org). But does
something exist to query and indicate that the current ver
On 10/21/2010 3:43 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, Clayton Keller wrote:
Is there an available/preferred method to query for the most recent
released version of SpamAssassin?
I know there exists TXT records to for each version to maintain
sa-update based rules (i.e. 1.3.3
On 10/21/2010 4:19 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 16:01 -0500, Clayton Keller wrote:
On 10/21/2010 3:43 PM, John Hardin wrote:
Is there an available/preferred method to query for the most recent
released version of SpamAssassin?
I know there exists TXT records to for
Jesse Houwing wrote:
Keith Ivey wrote:
Jesse Houwing wrote:
BODY TABLEOBFU
m{]+|"[^"]+)>(<([^>]+|"[^"]+)>)*[a-z]{1,2}(<([^>]+|"[^"]+)>)*]+|"[^"]+)>}i
I think you may want a * after the ) inside the <>. As it is, you're
looking for either a bunch of characters that are not > or a quote
follow
After looking through old list posts and the Wiki, I was under the
impression that I could enable autolearning by setting a tflags value
for the shortcircuited rule.
For instance:
priorityTEST-500
describeTESTMy Test
shortcircuitTESTspam
score TEST
I wanted to ask if others were seeing timeouts with the DOB lookups
within spamassassin. Also, it looks like their website
http://www.support-intelligence.com/dob/ is timing out as well.
Are others seeing this as well? I'm assuming most are zero'ing out the
rule for the time being?
Clay
I wanted to see if others began experiencing some delay in lookups to
bl.spamcop.net -- roughly 4+ second lookups.
On 3/23/2010 4:38 AM, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:12:16 +, Nigel Frankcom
wrote:
Hi All,
Apologies if this has already been asked. A hunt through Google didn't
help much nor did any digging around the SA site. That's not to say
it's not there, just that I can't find it :
I have run into a snag.
The release notes for 3.3.0 indicate that Mail::SPF::Query is no longer
used.
I have been using the pypolicyd-spf package from openspf.org, which
required python-spf to be installed to take advantage of their module.
With that I had previously used to following confi
On 3/25/2010 4:25 PM, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
On 25/03/2010 5:04 PM, Clayton Keller wrote:
I have run into a snag.
The release notes for 3.3.0 indicate that Mail::SPF::Query is no longer
used.
I have been using the pypolicyd-spf package from openspf.org, which
required python-spf
On 3/25/2010 4:58 PM, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
On 25/03/2010 5:37 PM, Clayton Keller wrote:
On 3/25/2010 4:25 PM, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
On 25/03/2010 5:04 PM, Clayton Keller wrote:
I have run into a snag.
The release notes for 3.3.0 indicate that Mail::SPF::Query is no longe
On 3/25/2010 6:47 PM, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
On 25/03/2010 7:33 PM, Mark Martinec wrote:
Was there any decisions regarding the deprecation of the use of
Mail::SPF::Query that has been tossed around? I will admit I have not
looked through any bug report requests regarding this at all.
I have
Dallas Engelken wrote:
Rob McEwen wrote:
(on-list follow-up)
By "proactive listings", I discovered in my off-list conversation with
Dallas that this refers to URIBL-Gold listings... where items are
listed in "uribl-gold" in advance of seeing them in actual spams. But
this uribl-gold list isn
I have been reading throught the Shortcircuit manpage as well as some
articles within the Wiki, and the manner in which I see it performing
within our install does not seem to coincide with how I am reading and
presumably understanding it to work.
First off, we are using SpamAssassin 3.2.4 pro
Justin Mason wrote:
Matt Kettler writes:
Clayton Keller wrote:
I have been reading throught the Shortcircuit manpage as well as some
articles within the Wiki, and the manner in which I see it performing
within our install does not seem to coincide with how I am reading and
presumably
Justin Mason wrote:
Clayton Keller writes:
Justin Mason wrote:
Matt Kettler writes:
Clayton Keller wrote:
I have been reading throught the Shortcircuit manpage as well as some
articles within the Wiki, and the manner in which I see it performing
within our install does not seem to coincide
Clayton Keller wrote:
Justin Mason wrote:
Clayton Keller writes:
Justin Mason wrote:
Matt Kettler writes:
Clayton Keller wrote:
I have been reading throught the Shortcircuit manpage as well as
some articles within the Wiki, and the manner in which I see it
performing within our install
19 matches
Mail list logo
