Hi,
If I understand well the configuration, the USER_IN_BLACKLIST_TO test doesn't
use the bayes autolearn system, am I right ?
If I am, how can I do if I want it to learn message that match this test ?
Force the tflag in local.cf ?
I use the USER_IN_BLACKLIST_TO as a kind of honeypot so all mail
On 06.12.22 09:09, DEMBLANS Mathieu wrote:
If I understand well the configuration, the USER_IN_BLACKLIST_TO test doesn't
use the bayes autolearn system, am I right ?
60_welcomelist.cf:tflags USER_IN_BLACKLIST_TO userconf nice
noautolearn
yes
If I am, how can I do if I want
Hi!
I'm using SA 4 trunk and tried the urinsrhsbl. Not sure if this is a bug or
abuse on my side.
I already have two RBLs... one
uribl.example.at
and one
uriblfull.example.at
The first does not use "tflags notrim", the second does.
Now I added a lookup for uribl.example.at like
urinsrhssub
On Tue, Dec 06, 2022 at 02:35:44PM +0100, Wolfgang Breyha wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm using SA 4 trunk and tried the urinsrhsbl. Not sure if this is a bug or
> abuse on my side.
>
> I already have two RBLs... one
> uribl.example.at
> and one
> uriblfull.example.at
>
> The first does not use "tflags not
On 06/12/2022 15:33, Henrik K wrote:
> I would just create a bug, preferably with tested examples of all variants.
> :-) Most than likely there has been some oversights with legacy code and
> notrim addition, *nsrhs* isn't even used in stock rules.
Hmmm, while writing the bugreport and digging d
Micron Confidential
Micron Confidential
