I'm happily filtering all mail with SA and it did catch much of spam.
unfortunately there IS spam >256K...
On 05.09.14 18:59, Adi wrote:
Of course, but rather it is such a small percentage compared to the
good messages (bigger than 250 KB).
IMHO rather that it is not worth it to filter.
if
Hi there
We've got a problem with a tonne of spam getting BAYES_50 or even
BAYES_00. We're re-training SA using "spamc -L spam" but it doesn't seem
to do as much as we'd like. Sometimes it doesn't change the BAYES_
score, and other times it might go from BAYES_50 to BAYES_80
I think bayes is work
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann
wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 23:50 -0400, Alex wrote:
>
> > > > I looked in the quarantined message, and according to the _TOKEN_
> > > > header I've added:
> > > >
> > > > X-Spam-MyReport: Tokens: new, 47; hammy, 7; neutral, 54; spammy,
On Sun, 2014-09-07 at 09:09 +1200, Jason Haar wrote:
> We've got a problem with a tonne of spam getting BAYES_50 or even
> BAYES_00. We're re-training SA using "spamc -L spam" but it doesn't seem
> to do as much as we'd like. Sometimes it doesn't change the BAYES_
> score, and other times it might
Please use plain-text rather than HTML. In particular with that really
bad indentation format of quoting.
On Sat, 2014-09-06 at 17:22 -0400, Alex wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 23:50 -0400, Alex wrote:
> >
> > > > > I looked in the qu
On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 12:52:34 -0400 (EDT),
Jude DaShiell wrote:
Jude> Since spamassassin cannot handle large spam over 2MB in size, what
Jude> can be used to handle that class of junk?
I use a script on the MX host to MIME reshape all large messages, dropping
all non-text attachments, and save the
Others have gracefully answered as to the substance of your message.
I'll have to be a pest and ask that you please do not use "Reply" or
"Followup" when you're starting a new topic. For list readers with user
agents that thread the standard (RFC standard) way, that breaks
threading.
The way to
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 06:38:23PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >W dniu 2014-09-05 17:55, Justin Edmands pisze:
> >>We are seeing a few emails that are about a 1MB and appear to have
>
> On 05.09.14 18:09, Adi wrote:
> >You should consider limiting SA processing to mail size
> >up to 150
