Hi there We've got a problem with a tonne of spam getting BAYES_50 or even BAYES_00. We're re-training SA using "spamc -L spam" but it doesn't seem to do as much as we'd like. Sometimes it doesn't change the BAYES_ score, and other times it might go from BAYES_50 to BAYES_80
I think bayes is working (there's also a tonne of mail getting BAYES_99) but I'm guessing there's some "learning logic" I'm not aware of to explain why me telling SA "this is spam" doesn't seem to be entirely listened to? So my question is: shouldn't "-L spam"/"-L ham" always make SA re-train the bayes more explicitly? Or is that really not possible with a single email message? (ie it's a statistics thing). Just trying to understand the backend :-) -- Cheers Jason Haar Corporate Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd. Phone: +1 408 481 8171 PGP Fingerprint: 7A2E 0407 C9A6 CAF6 2B9F 8422 C063 5EBB FE1D 66D1
