On 10/12/2013 9:28 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Oct 2013, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
>> Steve, the one who wrote this regex, would you please explain your
>> reasoning behind giving this rule a score so high as 2.8,
>
> That score was auto-assigned by masscheck, where it is doing quite well:
>
I've just tested building 3.4.0 on Centos 5 system where I also built
3.3.2. make and make test worked fine. I'm not sure if I can make it an
inplace replacement, though. Has anyone running MailScanner tried 3.4.0?
So, I haven't installed it yet.
Observations:
I'm missing a spec file. Earlier v
I tried to replace 3.3.2 with 3.4.0rc3 and got
the start up message as expected.
Tried to plug in a new ruleset and still no go.
Any ideas?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist
what is "the startup message as expected"? MailScanner message?
Does it lint correctly (MS)?
I've just built an rpm and installed it on a test system. So far it looks
good, but I have to send some mail to it now as this system normally
doesn't get mail.
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Inter
seems to be working on the test system.
Oct 13 15:56:31 news MailScanner[21325]: Requeue: 225071157F.A48D0 to
3B69711588
Oct 13 15:56:31 news MailScanner[21325]: Requeue: 22356114B9.A4C8E to
015801157F
Oct 13 15:56:31 news MailScanner[21325]: Uninfected: Delivered 2 messages
Oct 13 15:56:31 news
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
On 10/12/2013 9:28 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 12 Oct 2013, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Steve, the one who wrote this regex, would you please explain your
reasoning behind giving this rule a score so high as 2.8,
That score was auto-assigned by masschec
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013, John Hardin wrote:
And we've had corpora starvation issues the last few weeks; if the ham
corpus gets thin again updates may be delayed.
Yeah, we're starved for ham again; I don't know how quickly this change
will go out, sorry.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ
On 10/13/2013 9:20 AM, The Doctor wrote:
I tried to replace 3.3.2 with 3.4.0rc3 and got
the start up message as expected.
Tried to plug in a new ruleset and still no go.
Any ideas?
Thanks for trying the release candidate. I'll be happy to try and help
but need more information.
What does
On 10/13/2013 12:33 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013, John Hardin wrote:
And we've had corpora starvation issues the last few weeks; if the
ham corpus gets thin again updates may be delayed.
Yeah, we're starved for ham again; I don't know how quickly this
change will go out, sorry.
On 10/13/2013 9:17 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
I've just tested building 3.4.0 on Centos 5 system where I also built
3.3.2. make and make test worked fine. I'm not sure if I can make it an
inplace replacement, though. Has anyone running MailScanner tried 3.4.0?
So, I haven't installed it yet.
I don'
On Sunday 13 October 2013 15:17:40 Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> There doesn't seem to be a package perl-IO-Socket-IP available from
> any repo.
On Debian (and raspbian) it's called libio-socket-ip-perl,
on FreeBSD it is net/p5-IO-Socket-IP. Don't know about others.
> I don't know where the program fetc
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 10/13/2013 12:33 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013, John Hardin wrote:
> And we've had corpora starvation issues the last few weeks; if the ham
> corpus gets thin again updates may be delayed.
Yeah, we're starved for ham again; I
On 10/13/2013 2:17 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 10/13/2013 12:33 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013, John Hardin wrote:
> And we've had corpora starvation issues the last few weeks; if
the ham > corpus gets thin again updates may be delaye
On 10/13/2013 11:07 AM, John Hardin wrote:
...
> Yes. It will take a day or two to make it through masscheck. And we've
> had corpora starvation issues the last few weeks; if the ham corpus gets
> thin again updates may be delayed.
FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2
3am CDT w/score 2.8
11am CDT w/score 2.4
Upd
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 01:28:56PM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 10/13/2013 9:20 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>> I tried to replace 3.3.2 with 3.4.0rc3 and got
>> the start up message as expected.
>>
>> Tried to plug in a new ruleset and still no go.
>>
>> Any ideas?
> Thanks for trying the releas
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 01:28:56PM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 10/13/2013 9:20 AM, The Doctor wrote:
>> I tried to replace 3.3.2 with 3.4.0rc3 and got
>> the start up message as expected.
>>
>> Tried to plug in a new ruleset and still no go.
>>
>> Any ideas?
> Thanks for trying the releas
On 10/13/2013 5:43 PM, The Doctor wrote:
config: no rules were found! Do you need to run 'sa-update'?
Looks like you need to run make install and sa-update -D should then
install the ruleset you need.
regards,
KAM
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 05:46:55PM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 10/13/2013 5:43 PM, The Doctor wrote:
>> config: no rules were found! Do you need to run 'sa-update'?
> Looks like you need to run make install and sa-update -D should then
> install the ruleset you need.
>
> regards,
> KAM
On 10/13/2013 5:52 PM, The Doctor wrote:
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 05:46:55PM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 10/13/2013 5:43 PM, The Doctor wrote:
config: no rules were found! Do you need to run 'sa-update'?
Looks like you need to run make install and sa-update -D should then
install the rule
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 06:08:54PM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> On 10/13/2013 5:52 PM, The Doctor wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 05:46:55PM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>>> On 10/13/2013 5:43 PM, The Doctor wrote:
config: no rules were found! Do you need to run 'sa-update'?
>>> Looks
> I'm now running it on two production systems and have been monitoring it
> for quite a while. So far so good! We have some more work we want to
> do to roll out 3.4.0. If you are interested in knowing more or helping,
> please chime in on the dev list.
>
> Files for this release candidate
21 matches
Mail list logo
