I've been having various issues with changes to local.cf not "taking".
Seem to have resolved these, yet there is one more issue that troubles.
(mostly typos apparently, BTW)
So today, after getting changes to BAYES weights to "take", I found some SPAM
gets thru anyway as the
score come up shor
On Sat, 14 Sep 2013 07:24:31 -0400
Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
> I've been having various issues with changes to local.cf not "taking".
>
> Seem to have resolved these, yet there is one more issue that
> troubles. (mostly typos apparently, BTW)
>
> So today, after getting changes to BAYES weights to
>>> On 9/14/2013 at 7:40 AM, RW wrote:
On Sat, 14 Sep 2013 07:24:31 -0400
Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
> I've been having various issues with changes to local.cf not "taking".
>
> Seem to have resolved these, yet there is one more issue that
> troubles. (mostly typos apparently, BTW)
>
> So today,
On 9/14/2013 7:24 AM, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
I've been having various issues with changes to local.cf not "taking".
Seem to have resolved these, yet there is one more issue that troubles.
(mostly typos apparently, BTW)
So today, after getting changes to BAYES weights to "take", I found some S
On 14.09.13 08:12, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
Yes the displayed scores are all rounded.
Yet, just now, I got this:
(which apparently did not round the same way ?? Just trying to understand)
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,HTML_MESSAGE,
SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
>>> On 9/14/2013 at 11:24 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 14.09.13 08:12, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
>Yes the displayed scores are all rounded.
>Yet, just now, I got this:
>(which apparently did not round the same way ?? Just trying to understand)
>
>X-Spam-Level: **
>X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.
>>> On 9/14/2013 at 10:47 AM, "Kevin A. McGrail" wrote:
On 9/14/2013 7:24 AM, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
> I've been having various issues with changes to local.cf not "taking".
>
> Seem to have resolved these, yet there is one more issue that troubles.
> (mostly typos apparently, BTW)
>
> So today
My apologies as this is probably not the properly place for this but I can not
find a functioning web page or list of FuzzOCR . Even the installation
instructions I found were old in https://www.maiamailguard.comand had some
issues in format.
The problem is that is from my installation I a
Then likely some of those scores below
are -0.01 or something similar so they are bumping you JUST under
5.0
On 9/14/2013 12:29 PM, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
>>> On 9/14/2013 at 10:47 AM, "Kevin A. McGrail"
wrote:
On Sat, 14 Sep 2013, Jason Hirsh wrote:
My apologies as this is probably not the properly place for this but I
can not find a functioning web page or list of FuzzOCR . Even the
installation instructions I found were old in
https://www.maiamailguard.comand had some issues in format.
This is
On Sat, 14 Sep 2013 10:47:33 -0400
Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> It likely has to do with rounding. That 5.0 is likely a 4.999 or
> something. So there is floor/ceiling silliness that isn't really
> apparent from the reports. I think there are also scenarios where
> the rounding / display is don
Begin forwarded message:
> From: John Hardin
> Subject: Re: FUZZOCR
> Date: September 14, 2013 1:46:21 PM EDT
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>
> On Sat, 14 Sep 2013, Jason Hirsh wrote:
>
>> My apologies as this is probably not the properly place for this but I can
>> not find a function
Don't know if my earlier response worked
On Sep 14, 2013, at 1:46 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Sep 2013, Jason Hirsh wrote:
>
>> My apologies as this is probably not the properly place for this but I can
>> not find a functioning web page or list of FuzzOCR . Even the installation
>>
On 9/13/2013 9:01 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
Kris Deugau writes:
From man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf:
report_safe 0
Thanks, I see I commented it out for some experiment several mnths
ago, and of course, forgot to uncomment.
(chuckles and mutters something about "version control systems")
On
On Sat, 14 Sep 2013, Thomas Harold wrote:
On 9/13/2013 9:01 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
Kris Deugau writes:
> From man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf:
>
> report_safe 0
Thanks, I see I commented it out for some experiment several mnths
ago, and of course, forgot to uncomment.
(chuckles and m
Hi Guys,
This may sound a basic questions but would like to know under what
circumstances one should use IMAP/POP3 Anti Spam services? I do have AS for
SMTP and is blokcing well but would like to know what consequences it would
cause if I enable or disable the Pop3/imap Anti Spam settings.
Does S
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> This may sound a basic questions but would like to know under what
>> circumstances one should use IMAP/POP3 Anti Spam services? I do have AS for
>> SMTP and is blokcing well but would like to know what consequences it would
>> cause if I enable or disable the Pop3/imap Anti Sp
On Sat, 2013-09-14 at 21:54 -0400, Thomas Harold wrote:
> On 9/13/2013 9:01 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
> > Kris Deugau writes:
> >
> >> From man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf:
> >>
> >> report_safe 0
> >
> > Thanks, I see I commented it out for some experiment several mnths
> > ago, and of course, forgot
18 matches
Mail list logo
