>>> On 9/14/2013 at 10:47 AM, "Kevin A. McGrail" <kmcgr...@pccc.com> wrote:
On 9/14/2013 7:24 AM, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote: > I've been having various issues with changes to local.cf not "taking". > > Seem to have resolved these, yet there is one more issue that troubles. > (mostly typos apparently, BTW) > > So today, after getting changes to BAYES weights to "take", I found some SPAM > gets thru anyway as the > score come up short, in my arithmetic. 4.9 and not 5.0. Does it have to do > with the "- " in front of some tests? > > You will see below what I mean: > > ----- > > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on open-122 > X-Spam-Level: **** > X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,HTML_MESSAGE, > SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 > X-Spam-Report: > * 5.0 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100% > * [score: 1.0000] > * -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record > * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record > * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message > ----- Hi Joe, It likely has to do with rounding. That 5.0 is likely a 4.999 or something. So there is floor/ceiling silliness that isn't really apparent from the reports. I think there are also scenarios where the rounding / display is done differently and I unified that code in the trunk a year or so ago. Regards, KAM Thanks. For now I just changed the scores to n.1 just for fun. joe a.
