Jeremy Davila wrote on Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:27:17 -0500:
> Is there any SA reporting feature to analyze scores and etc. ?
Can you rephrase that so one actually understands it? If you are asking
about adding scores to the message headers. Yes, this is possible.
see
http://spamassassin.apache.org
Andy Dorman wrote on Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:03:01 -0600:
> We were just hoping someone else in this group would have run into this
> situation and have a suggestion, given how ubiquitous webmail is these days.
> If
> not, we will keep pounding at it.
Well, the easiest and fastest solution is to
On 28.01.09 11:31, Rops wrote:
> Thanks for all your replies. That is exactly, what I wanted to know.
> "Locally global" ISP's don't have much of competition and can afford
> themselves providing a bad service and no customer support at all.
>
> I would like to be able to undersand spam filtering
On 28.01.09 22:36, RW wrote:
> I just pass it though dspam and then score like this:
>
> header DS_HAM X-DSPAM-Result =~ /^(Innocent|Whitelisted)/
> header DS_SPAM X-DSPAM-Result =~ /^Spam/
> meta DS_HAM_FULL DS_HAM && (BAYES_00 || BAYES_05)
>
> scoreDS_HAM-2.5
> s
On 29.01.09 03:23, RW wrote:
> I meant have Bayes learn from the DSPAM header rules that I quoted.
> What does the plugin actually do that simply piping mail though DSPAM
> before SA doesn't?
you want SA BAYES filter to learn from what will DSPAM filter tell it?
You can do that with procmail/mail
Rw wrote on Thu, 29 Jan 2009 03:23:47 +:
> > > However, thinking about it a bit more, I think that the only real
> > > problem is that ham that scores between 0.1 and 5.0
> > > wont be learned as ham, and I can fix that by moving the autolearn
> > > threshold to up to 4.9.
> >
> > Eek! No, t
Rops schrieb:
> Hi Robert,
>
> Thanks for your reply.
> As I am not a server admin myself, I don't have access to any filter
> settings.
> Also in global servers, there isn't any admin available to talk or complain
> about problems :-(
thats your problem, change your email provider
>
> But it l
is is EVER acceptable to have an empty tag?
(appears that anything inside an empty