In article ,
David Hasbrouck writes
>I am having an issue where all my emails are getting tagged with
>URIBL_RED/GREY/BLACK. Emails that contain invalid domains in them
>are also getting tagged.
>
>From the information I have found, to test this, I should lookup
>the domain
Hello *,
since arrount 5 days I am hit by several 10.000 very small (~2 kByte)
messages which use my email addresse in "From:" and "To:"...
Does anyone know, how to stop this shit effectively?
1st mail server is courier-mts + courier-imap + spamassassin + clamav
2nd mail server is postfix + d
Hi there,
We use SA 3.2.1 on FreeBSD 6.1. We have Bayes and Razor in use.
Lately, 3 weeks or so, we¹ve been getting HUGE negative scores on our spam.
And it¹s coming in by the truck load. We use Sa-Update to update our rules
from saupdates.openprotect.com and updates.spamassassin.org
Has anybo
On Mon, December 29, 2008 14:10, Frank DeChellis wrote:
> Lately, 3 weeks or so, we¹ve been getting HUGE negative scores on
> our spam.
no evidence, no help
spamassassin 2>&1 -D -t sa.log
post sa.log to a pastebin site and give us the url here
--
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www
On 29.12.08 08:10, Frank DeChellis wrote:
> Lately, 3 weeks or so, we¹ve been getting HUGE negative scores on our spam.
which scores were in progress?
> And it¹s coming in by the truck load. We use Sa-Update to update our rules
> from saupdates.openprotect.com and updates.spamassassin.org
>
> H
On 28.12.08 23:55, David Hasbrouck wrote:
> I use qmail with simscan, run spamd as a daemon. I am running Spam
> Assassin 3.2.5 on CentOS 4.7.
>
> I am having an issue where all my emails are getting tagged with
> URIBL_RED/GREY/BLACK.
> Emails that contain invalid domains in them are also gettin
Michelle Konzack schrieb:
Hello *,
since arrount 5 days I am hit by several 10.000 very small (~2 kByte)
messages which use my email addresse in "From:" and "To:"...
Does anyone know, how to stop this shit effectively?
1st mail server is courier-mts + courier-imap + spamassassin + clamav
2n
Does DynDNS allow SPF records?
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 15:08:38 +0100, Matthias Haegele
wrote:
>Michelle Konzack schrieb:
>> Hello *,
>>
>> since arrount 5 days I am hit by several 10.000 very small (~2 kByte)
>> messages which use my email addresse in "From:" and "To:"...
>>
>> Does anyone kn
>By any chance, didn't your ISP start "providing search service" for any
>web name that does not exist?
btw, whats the workaround for this? opendns didnt work for me as they have
similar "features".
do you simply query the bl's dns service directly?
--
best regards
Arvid Ephraim Picciani
A
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Arvid Ephraim Picciani
wrote:
>>By any chance, didn't your ISP start "providing search service" for any
>>web name that does not exist?
>
> btw, whats the workaround for this? opendns didnt work for me as they have
> similar "features".
supposedly these can be
Frank DeChellis a écrit :
> Hi there,
>
> We use SA 3.2.1 on FreeBSD 6.1. We have Bayes and Razor in use.
>
> Lately, 3 weeks or so, we’ve been getting HUGE negative scores on our
> spam. And it’s coming in by the truck load. We use Sa-Update to update
> our rules from saupdates.openprotect.co
On Mon, 2008-12-29 at 13:26 +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Hello *,
>
> since arrount 5 days I am hit by several 10.000 very small (~2 kByte)
> messages which use my email addresse in "From:" and "To:"...
>
> Does anyone know, how to stop this shit effectively?
>
If the spammer is forgin
Michelle Konzack wrote on Mon, 29 Dec 2008 13:26:25 +0100:
> Does anyone know, how to stop this shit effectively?
You are not the only one affected by this. Others asked before you.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
As with other suggestions, don't whitelist your own domain (usually the
problem)
you might post an email to your web site in whole (DON'T POST IT TO
THIS GROUP! MESSES THINGS UP)
also, SA and Razor are keep upto date on Freebsd (I am the ports
maintainer for SA), and you won't get any upda
Here's what I use to only know about other's SourceForge changes, not my own:
header J_SOURCEFORGE exists:X-SourceForge-Tracker-itemupdate-username
score J_SOURCEFORGE -5
header J_SOURCEFORGE_ME
X-SourceForge-Tracker-itemupdate-username=~/^(jidanni|Item Submitter)$/
score J_SOURCEFORGE_ME 10
I don't suppose there is a way to use environment variables,
header NO_ME ToCc !~ /${USER}/i
without perhaps a preprocessor to turn them into
header NO_ME ToCc !~ /jidanni/i
Or use procmail's *$...$LOGNAME instead of SpamAssassin here.
From: "Arvid Ephraim Picciani"
Sent: Monday, 2008, December 29 06:14
>By any chance, didn't your ISP start "providing search service" for any
web name that does not exist?
btw, whats the workaround for this? opendns didnt work for me as they
have
similar "features".
do you simply quer
Hey, all,
I have a bunch of servers that picked up a rule update, 729912 this
morning about 10am EST, at which point all hell broke loose---scores for
everything but bayes dropped to almost nothing.
Has anyone else experienced anything like this?
Mike.
Matthias Haegele wrote:
> Michelle Konzack schrieb:
>
>> since arrount 5 days I am hit by several 10.000 very small (~2 kByte)
>> messages which use my email addresse in "From:" and "To:"...
>>
>> Does anyone know, how to stop this shit effectively?
>>
>> 1st mail server is courier-mts + courie
Michael Alan Dorman writes:
>Hey, all,
>
>I have a bunch of servers that picked up a rule update, 729912 this
>morning about 10am EST, at which point all hell broke loose---scores for
>everything but bayes dropped to almost nothing.
>
>Has anyone else experienced anything like this?
hmm. What do
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008 23:21:48 +
j...@jmason.org (Justin Mason) wrote:
> hmm. What do you have in /var/lib/spamassassin for the scores files?
> they should look like this:
>
> : 183...; ls
> -l /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002006/updates_spamassassin_org/50_scores.cf
> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002
I am trying (unsuccessfully) to write a rule to pickup if the
"authenticated bits=0" in the Received line of the header and give it
-100
I am not sure if spamass-milter Version 0.3.1is passing the Received
line to SA.
Does anyone know if that works? Or a better way to do it?
header LOCAL_AUTH_R
On Mon, 29 Dec 2008, Bazooka Joe wrote:
I am trying (unsuccessfully) to write a rule to pickup if the
"authenticated bits=0" in the Received line of the header and give it
-100
Does anyone know if that works? Or a better way to do it?
header LOCAL_AUTH_RCVD2Received =~ /authenticated
Hi there,
After reading how SAGrey plug works, I wonder to know of you in what scenarios
do you recomed it?
TIA
LD
24 matches
Mail list logo