Asif Iqbal a écrit :
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 8:09 PM, LuKreme wrote:
>> On 11-Dec-2008, at 11:51, Asif Iqbal wrote:
>>> whitelist_from_rcvd joe.sm...@here.com qtdenexmbm24.AD.HERE.COM
>> Really here.com? The here.com that is registered to Network Solutions? Or
>> are you making up d
On 11-Dec-2008, at 19:47, Asif Iqbal wrote:
I did not know `example.tld' is reserved for documentation.
Example.com is reserved (along with example.org .net, and most non-
country tlds). However, since often, especially when talking about
mailing systems, you need to talk about several dif
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Well, isn't it better to use them before SA, provided your MTA does have
this feature (I recommend Exim to everyone)?
No -- unless you ultimately trust the RBL to produce a *negligible*
amount of FPs. Every single RBL does have FPs to a highly variable
degree. Instead
John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Karsten Br�ckelmann wrote:
I still recommend initial training, to give Bayes a good kick-start.
Initial _manual_ training.
Define manual: manual picking out spams is plain too labor-intensive. If
we redefine "manual" to mean ham coming from authentic
Henrik K wrote:
sure there's other useful stuff you can do with spamtrap mails too.
Unfortunately it takes a lot of effort to create *good* spamtraps.
Yep.
It's just
too much trouble for a normal admin, I leave it to those who have time on
their hands. You can do the simple grep for "mistyp
Hello,
Can someone please tell me if this is possible ?
header __RULE1_01 From =~ /domain\.com/i
header __RULE2_02 Reply-To !~ /domain\.com/i
meta RULE03 (__RULE1_01 && __RULE2_02)
score RULE03 0.01
So can the : !~ be used in a header rule ?
I have never tried it before
Greetings ... Rich
On 12/12/2008 11:54 AM, R.Smits wrote:
Hello,
Can someone please tell me if this is possible ?
header __RULE1_01 From =~ /domain\.com/i
header __RULE2_02 Reply-To !~ /domain\.com/i
meta RULE03 (__RULE1_01 && __RULE2_02)
score RULE03 0.01
So can the : !~ be used in a header rule ?
afaik, nope
In article , LuKreme
writes
>The gpg installed on my FreeBSD does not have a man page (installed by
>ports for SA3.2.5, IIRC), just a --help which says the syntax is:
Logically you have security/gnupg installed which means...
%ls -l /usr/local/bin/gpg*
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4 Oct 15
Marcin Krol wrote on Fri, 12 Dec 2008 10:43:57 +0100:
> posted spamtraps to Usenet some 6 months ago and I
> still get very little spam caught in spamtraps.
you will have to exclude them from RBL blocking, of course ;-)
I have one Usenet spamtrap that is getting a lot of spam, although it
hasn
My god, let it go, please!
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
Marcin Krol wrote on Fri, 12 Dec 2008 10:37:31 +0100:
> Define manual: manual picking out spams is plain too labor-intensive. If
> we redefine "manual" to mean ham coming from authenticated mail, and
> spam coming from spamtraps, I wholeheartedly agree.
The point is that you need to have a corp
Hello,
in one topic in the past - some users had an discussion about spamtraps.
Is there any chance to get a "how to start a spamtrap with spamassassin" ?
thx
Sebastian
Yet Another Ninja wrote:
> On 12/12/2008 11:54 AM, R.Smits wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Can someone please tell me if this is possible ?
>>
>> header __RULE1_01 From =~ /domain\.com/i
>> header __RULE2_02 Reply-To !~ /domain\.com/i
>> meta RULE03 (__RULE1_01 && __RULE2_02)
>> score RULE03 0.01
>>
>> So c
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 13:24 +0100, R.Smits wrote:
> Yet Another Ninja wrote:
> > On 12/12/2008 11:54 AM, R.Smits wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Can someone please tell me if this is possible ?
> >>
> >> header __RULE1_01 From =~ /domain\.com/i
> >> header __RULE2_02 Reply-To !~ /domain\.com/i
> >> me
Marcin Krol wrote:
Henrik K wrote:
sure there's other useful stuff you can do with spamtrap mails too.
Unfortunately it takes a lot of effort to create *good* spamtraps.
Yep.
It's just
too much trouble for a normal admin, I leave it to those who have time on
their hands. You can do the sim
sebast...@debianfan.de wrote:
Hello,
in one topic in the past - some users had an discussion about spamtraps.
Is there any chance to get a "how to start a spamtrap with spamassassin" ?
thx
Sebastian
Here's one approach:
http://blog.rompe.org/How_to_configure_spamassassin_to_use_an_inexist
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 3:00 AM, mouss wrote:
> Asif Iqbal a écrit :
>> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 8:09 PM, LuKreme wrote:
>>> On 11-Dec-2008, at 11:51, Asif Iqbal wrote:
whitelist_from_rcvd joe.sm...@here.com qtdenexmbm24.AD.HERE.COM
>>> Really here.com? The here.com that is regist
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 3:06 AM, LuKreme wrote:
> On 11-Dec-2008, at 19:47, Asif Iqbal wrote:
>>
>> I did not know `example.tld' is reserved for documentation.
>
>
> Example.com is reserved (along with example.org .net, and most non-country
> tlds). However, since often, especially when talking a
Hi,
sa-update currently fails with:
http: request failed: 403 Forbidden: HTML 2.0//EN"> 403 Forbidden
Forbidden You don't have permission to access
/rules/stage/320725913.tar.gz on this server.
Apache/2.2.8 (Ubuntu) DAV/2 SVN/1.4.6 PHP/5.2.4-2ubuntu5.3 with
Suhosin-Patch mod_ssl/2.2.8 Ope
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Marcin Krol wrote:
John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Karsten Br�ckelmann wrote:
> I still recommend initial training, to give Bayes a good kick-start.
Initial _manual_ training.
Define manual: manual picking out spams is plain too labor-intensive.
Manual trai
On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 17:12 -0700, LuKreme wrote:
> On 11-Dec-2008, at 14:29, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> I read a hell of a lot of stuff about all this, and have been running
> SA since 2.mumble If you are a plug-n-play sysadmin, then no
> problem. If you are already well-versed in the vag
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Jan P. Kessler wrote:
Hi,
sa-update currently fails with:
http: request failed: 403 Forbidden: 2.0//EN"> 403 Forbidden
Forbidden You don't have permission to access
/rules/stage/320725913.tar.gz on this server. Apache/2.2.8
(Ubuntu) DAV/2 SVN/1.4.6 PHP/5.2.4-2ubuntu5
Karsten Bräckelmann schrieb:
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 15:03 +0100, Jan P. Kessler wrote:
sa-update currently fails with:
http: request failed: 403 Forbidden: [...]
Any permission issues on yerp.org?
Just tested, works for me. Did you try again?
Jep, it's working now! Th
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 15:03 +0100, Jan P. Kessler wrote:
> sa-update currently fails with:
>
> http: request failed: 403 Forbidden: [...]
> Any permission issues on yerp.org?
Just tested, works for me. Did you try again?
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4
On 12-Dec-2008, at 07:20, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
If
something doesn't work, please do at least think twice about the
command
that failed, *before* venting your broken syntax to the list.
It wasn't *MY* broken syntax, that's the whole point.
--
The other cats just think he's a tosser. -
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 15:32 +0100, Jan P. Kessler wrote:
> Karsten Bräckelmann schrieb:
> > On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 15:03 +0100, Jan P. Kessler wrote:
> >
> >> sa-update currently fails with:
> >>
> >> http: request failed: 403 Forbidden: [...]
> >>
> >
> >
> >> Any permission issues on y
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, McDonald, Dan wrote:
Just tested, works for me. Did you try again?
Jep, it's working now! Thank you, JM!
It's failing again
Like I said, it appears to be a transient problem, possibly related to the
publication schedule of rule updates.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ
Marcin Krol a écrit :
> Henrik K wrote:
> sure there's other useful stuff you can do with spamtrap mails too.
>>
>> Unfortunately it takes a lot of effort to create *good* spamtraps.
>
> Yep.
>
>> It's just
>> too much trouble for a normal admin, I leave it to those who have time on
>> their han
Yet Another Ninja wrote:
> On 12/12/2008 11:54 AM, R.Smits wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Can someone please tell me if this is possible ?
>>
>> header __RULE1_01 From =~ /domain\.com/i
>> header __RULE2_02 Reply-To !~ /domain\.com/i
>> meta RULE03 (__RULE1_01 && __RULE2_02)
>> score RULE03 0.01
>>
>> So c
29 matches
Mail list logo
