Marcin Krol wrote on Fri, 12 Dec 2008 10:37:31 +0100: > Define manual: manual picking out spams is plain too labor-intensive. If > we redefine "manual" to mean ham coming from authenticated mail, and > spam coming from spamtraps, I wholeheartedly agree.
The point is that you need to have a corpus of *guaranteed* ham and spam, that you feed manually right before you start scanning or a ready-made Bayes db containing this. Enabling Bayes and feeding it with what you get after that time until you reach the threshold is not a good way of starting. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
