Re: [offtopic] Are 8-bit characters completely illegal in a raw message?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > So, as I've found in RFC's all header fields in message should > be encoded to 7-bit data. s/should/must/ > In addition my SMTP server does *not* support 8-bit MIME for > incoming e-mail. That's very uncommon and lot of mail will be probably rejected due to this.

Re: Help Help Help, 1 month trying to figure it out and still no luck

Hello! This an email sample: Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:40:01 +0200 Received: from k2smtpout02-01.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net ([64.202.189.90]:46436) by dobrogea.romedchim.com with smtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-

spamassassin lint warnings

Hello. I'm running SA 3.2.4. When I run "spamassassin --lint -D" I get a bunch of warnings like those below. I'm seeing the same two warnings for many of the files in /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002004 and /etc/mail/spamassassin. Any ideas on how to fix these? Thanks! [32690] warn: "my" variable $l m

Re: [offtopic] Are 8-bit characters completely illegal in a raw message?

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > In addition my SMTP server does *not* support 8-bit MIME for > > incoming e-mail. On 01.04.08 10:52, Enrico Scholz wrote: > That's very uncommon and lot of mail will be probably rejected > due to this. are there known problems with mailers that can send/receive 8-b

Re: mail from dialups via ISP MTA

> On Monday 31 March 2008 22:53:45 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > Such IP's are thus not designed to send mail directly to recipients - users > > have to send mail through mailserver with static IP that can autenticate > > them. On 31.03.08 22:06, Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote: > True. The prob

Re: mail from dialups via ISP MTA

On Tuesday 01 April 2008 16:06:25 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > On Monday 31 March 2008 22:53:45 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > > Such IP's are thus not designed to send mail directly to recipients - > > > users have to send mail through mailserver with static IP that can > > > autenticate t

Score Definitions

Hello, I am a first-time user of SpamAssasin. While testing content for a client I received the below results: 0.6 HTML_90_100 BODY: Message is 90% to 100% HTML 0.9 HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_04 BODY: HTML has a low ratio of text to image area 2.3 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_12 BODY: HTML: images with 800-1200

How to whitelist the recipient?

Hi list- Sorry if this is a FAQ. I'm running latest SA with qmail (through qmail-scanner-st) for my home domain. How do I configure SA to whitelist particular recipient's email address? I mean if someone is sending a message to my local email address I want SA to either not scan it or give it les

Re: mail from dialups via ISP MTA

and another mail false positive: 2.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net [Blocked - see ] 1.1 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is a abuseable web server [91.151.146.2

Re: [offtopic] Are 8-bit characters completely illegal in a raw message?

Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > In addition my SMTP server does *not* support 8-bit MIME for >> > incoming e-mail. >> >> That's very uncommon and lot of mail will be probably rejected >> due to this. > > are there known problems with mailers that can send/receive > 8-bit bu

Re: How to whitelist the recipient?

Roman Serbski escribió: How do I configure SA to whitelist particular recipient's email address? I mean if someone is sending a message to my local email address I want SA to either not scan it or give it less score (whitelisting?). At the same time, the scoring for the whole domain will remain t

Re: How to whitelist the recipient?

Roman Serbski escribió: How do I configure SA to whitelist particular recipient's email address? Actually, I think you need "whitelist_to", same syntax as whitelist_from. There are other options: more_spam_to and all_spam_to. See the documentation at http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x

Re: How to whitelist the recipient?

On Tue, April 1, 2008 20:17, Diego Pomatta wrote: > Roman Serbski escribió: >> How do I configure SA to whitelist particular recipient's >> email address? I mean if someone is sending a message to my local >> email address I want SA to either not scan it or give it less score >> (whitelisting?). A

Re: How to whitelist the recipient?

Benny Pedersen escribió: On Tue, April 1, 2008 20:17, Diego Pomatta wrote: Roman Serbski escribió: How do I configure SA to whitelist particular recipient's email address? I mean if someone is sending a message to my local email address I want SA to either not scan it or give it less sc

Re: mail from dialups via ISP MTA

Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote: and another mail false positive: 2.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net [Blocked - see ] 1.1 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is a abuseable web server

Re: can we make AWL ignore mail from self to self?

On Mar 28, 2008, at 6:21 PM, Theo Van Dinter wrote: On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 06:09:03PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote: I think that mail from self to self should be ignored by the AWL. (it's harder to forged mail from a regular correspondent, so this makes AWL more useful) If you know the mail is from

Re: can we make AWL ignore mail from self to self?

Benn, you are missing the point. AWL is working very well for our needs. What I am pointing out is that AWL should not be used for mail from self to self, because this is an easy forgery. AWL counts on the spammer not being able to forge someone you correspond with normally. This is usu

Re: Upgrade SpamAssassin failing

Still looking for some suggestion on this On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Asif Iqbal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have tried to upgrade spamassassin twice with no avail. Current > version running is 3.2.3 on Solaris 8 > > cpan> install Mail::SpamAssassin > Running install for module Mail::

Re: Score Definitions

Hi Josie, At 09:09 01-04-2008, Josie Walls wrote: I am a first-time user of SpamAssasin. While testing content for a client I received the below results: 0.6 HTML_90_100 BODY: Message is 90% to 100% HTML 0.9 HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_04 BODY: HTML has a low ratio of text to image area 2.3 HTML_IMAGE_ONL

RE: Upgrade SpamAssassin failing

https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5591 > -Original Message- > From: Asif Iqbal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 3:59 PM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: Upgrade SpamAssassin failing > > Still looking for some suggestion on th

Re: can we make AWL ignore mail from self to self?

On Mar 29, 2008, at 3:21 AM, Justin Mason wrote: the AWL is keyed on email address and /16 of the sending IP address, so this may warrant more investigation. could you post the Received hdrs from the spam that hit the AWL, and a ham that properly hits the AWL? I still believe that self<->sel

Re: Upgrade SpamAssassin failing

On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Rosenbaum, Larry M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5591 Thanks a lot. I will change the PATH during the make and report back to the bug site and here my experience > > > > > > -Original Message- > > Fr

Re: Spam abuse report plugin

On Mar 28, 2008, at 7:42 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 27.03.08 19:58, ram wrote: I personally dont like the traditional spamcop report method of forwarding Spamcop uses a double confirm method, and to confirm all mails is a pain. I will look at how to automate this. I trust spamcop shoul

Re: can we make AWL ignore mail from self to self?

Jo Rhett wrote: > Benn, you are missing the point. AWL is working very well for our > needs. I have never been fond of AWL because the information it relies upon, the mail headers, is very easy to forge. It depends too much upon trusting the sender. And in the case of spam that trust model is

Re: can we make AWL ignore mail from self to self?

Jo Rhett writes: > On Mar 29, 2008, at 3:21 AM, Justin Mason wrote: > > the AWL is keyed on email address and /16 of the sending IP > > address, so > > this may warrant more investigation. could you post the Received hdrs > > from the spam that hit the AWL, and a ham that properly hits the AWL?

Re: can we make AWL ignore mail from self to self?

On Tue, April 1, 2008 21:43, Jo Rhett wrote: > On Mar 28, 2008, at 6:21 PM, Theo Van Dinter wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 06:09:03PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote: >>> I think that mail from self to self should be ignored by the AWL. >>> (it's harder to forged mail from a regular correspondent, so thi

Re: How to whitelist the recipient?

On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, Roman Serbski wrote: I'm running latest SA with qmail (through qmail-scanner-st) for my home domain. How do I configure SA to whitelist particular recipient's email address? I mean if someone is sending a message to my local email address I want SA to either not scan it or gi

Re: can we make AWL ignore mail from self to self?

On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, Jo Rhett wrote: On Mar 28, 2008, at 6:21 PM, Theo Van Dinter wrote: On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 06:09:03PM -0700, Jo Rhett wrote: > I think that mail from self to self should be ignored by the AWL. > (it's harder to forged mail from a regular correspondent, so this > makes AWL m

vbounce

yay i finally had the pleasure of getting joe jobbed! so i am looking at vbounce. i think it is working but when i intentionally bounce to myself the by sending to a non existent address, whitelist_bounce_relays does not seem to trigger. searching the archives i noticed that this may have

Dramatic increase in bounce messages to forged addresses

I mostly lurk here, gleaning bits of wisdom from those far more knowledgeable than me, however... I am getting a dramatic increase in bounce messages with my domain forged sent to me. At least some of the messages still retain the headers so I can tell that we did not originate the message.

RE: Dramatic increase in bounce messages to forged addresses

Yup. Big rise over the past two weeks. Kurt > -Original Message- > From: William Terry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 17:07 > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Dramatic increase in bounce messages to forged addresses > > > I mostly lurk here, gleani

Re: Dramatic increase in bounce messages to forged addresses

On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, William Terry wrote: Is there anything I can do to mitigate this? Do you publish SPF records? -- John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [EMAIL PROTECTED] key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F

Re: can we make AWL ignore mail from self to self?

On Tue, April 1, 2008 21:45, Jo Rhett wrote: > Benn, you are missing the point. AWL is working very well for our > needs. good > What I am pointing out is that AWL should not be used for > mail from self to self, because this is an easy forgery. explain why its a problem when awl logs ip > AW

RE: Dramatic increase in bounce messages to forged addresses

I'll second that - a tremendous increase At 08:15 PM 4/1/2008, Kurt Buff wrote: Yup. Big rise over the past two weeks. Kurt > -Original Message- > From: William Terry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 17:07 > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Dramat

RE: spamassassin lint warnings

> -Original Message- > From: Rod G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, 2 April 2008 1:26 a.m. > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: spamassassin lint warnings > > Hello. I'm running SA 3.2.4. When I run "spamassassin --lint -D" I get > a bunch of warnings like those below

Re: Dramatic increase in bounce messages to forged addresses

On Wed, April 2, 2008 02:06, William Terry wrote: > I mostly lurk here, gleaning bits of wisdom from those far more > knowledgeable than me, however... i have no clue either :-) > I am getting a dramatic increase in bounce messages with my domain > forged sent to me. At least some of the messag

Re: Dramatic increase in bounce messages to forged addresses

John Hardin wrote: On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, William Terry wrote: Is there anything I can do to mitigate this? Do you publish SPF records? We haven't as of yet. I have been looking at it though since this last burst of backscatter. Any idea how widely SPF record checking has been adopted out th

Re: How to whitelist the recipient?

On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 11:57 PM, Benny Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, April 1, 2008 20:17, Diego Pomatta wrote: > > Roman Serbski escribió: > >> How do I configure SA to whitelist particular recipient's > >> email address? I mean if someone is sending a message to my local > >> ema

Re: Re: [offtopic] Are 8-bit characters completely illegal in a raw message?

Thanks for all answers. Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01.04.2008 18:11:03: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > In addition my SMTP server does *not* support 8-bit MIME for > > > incoming e-mail. > > On 01.04.08 10:52, Enrico Scholz wrote: > > That's very uncommon and lot of

Re: vbounce

Hi, We have exacly the same issue over here. I am very interested in a solution. If i look at the maillog file, I don't see a MY_SERVERS_FOUND triggered anywhere ? Greetings... Richard JP Kelly wrote: > yay i finally had the pleasure of getting joe jobbed! > > so i am looking at vbounce. i thin

Re: vbounce

On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 08:30:37AM +0200, R.Smits wrote: > Hi, > > We have exacly the same issue over here. I am very interested in a > solution. If i look at the maillog file, I don't see a MY_SERVERS_FOUND > triggered anywhere ? You are not supposed to see __MY_SERVERS_FOUND. It's a hidden rule