On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 10:53:03AM +0530, Tarak Ranjan wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 15:51 +0200, Henrik K wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 06:41:26PM +0530, Tarak Ranjan wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 12:28 +, Justin Mason wrote:
> > > > Henrik K writes:
> > > > > I updated my
> > Generally it gets installed in /etc/init.d or /etc/rc.d/init.d, and
> > then symlinked to various /etc/rc.d directories to
> > cause it to be called at various runlevels. If your system has
> > redhat-ish and chkconfig, it can automate this part for you, as the
> > redhat init script that c
It sure as hell CAN send in this format. I just did it, silly people.
{^_^} Joanne speaks - please listen.Title: Daily Diatribe
==
Newsletter 20080324
Regarding "FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS":
Outlook sure as hell CAN send HTML in this for
Sn!per wrote:
Quoting Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
ie: the two most recent for the 3.2 branch are:
# sa-update_3.2_20080114123639/
# sa-update_3.2_20080114144817/
Which were both made on January 14th, 2008. I suspect the rest is a
timestamp, but I'm not entirely sure. If it is, the
Sn!per wrote:
Quoting Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Sn!per wrote:
Hi all,
Am using SA version 3.2.4 . So far working great.
I am comparing the headers on two of my mails. The first mail is NOT a
spam, and X-Spam-Status is like so:
No, score=2.7 required=10.0 tests=RC
On Tue, March 18, 2008 22:36, Jason Haar wrote:
> ...we're getting around 15,000 per day at the moment: emails containing
> one line of text and a <1Kbyte zip attachment (filename varies) - which
> contains a spammy HTML file.
yes to late to stop the spam, but sender ip is listed in spamhaus, and
Just upgraded to 3.2.4.
I am running spamassasin as a normal user, not root.
I keep seeing this in the log files.
bayes: cannot open bayes databases /var/sabayes/.spamassassin/bayes_*
R/W: lock failed: File exists
There are about 20 lock files in the directory.
Is spamassassin not cleaning
On Mar 24, 2008, at 11:08 AM, Mike Fahey wrote:
Just upgraded to 3.2.4.
I am running spamassasin as a normal user, not root.
I keep seeing this in the log files.
bayes: cannot open bayes databases /var/sabayes/.spamassassin/
bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists
There are about 20 lock fil
Mike Fahey wrote:
Just upgraded to 3.2.4.
I am running spamassasin as a normal user, not root.
I keep seeing this in the log files.
bayes: cannot open bayes databases /var/sabayes/.spamassassin/bayes_*
R/W: lock failed: File exists
There are about 20 lock files in the directory.
Is spamass
Henrik K wrote:
Hello,
I updated my FreeMail plugin with a big list of domains
(http://www.rhyolite.com/anti-spam/freemail.html).
Try it out:
http://sa.hege.li/FreeMail.pm
http://sa.hege.li/FreeMail.cf
Pretty good hit ratio here, especially when you add some extra scores like
FREEMAIL_FROM
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 09:19:19AM -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
>
> I have a suggestion for your freemail plugin. I don't know if you can do
> this but if you can I want to see how.
>
> First look at the last received and verify that it is genuine. (Forward
> Confirmed rDNS). If it is then check t
Matt Kettler wrote:
Sn!per wrote:
Quoting Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
ie: the two most recent for the 3.2 branch are:
# sa-update_3.2_20080114123639/
# sa-update_3.2_20080114144817/
Which were both made on January 14th, 2008. I suspect the rest is a
timestamp, but I'm not entirely
SA 3.20 was working okay, went for the 3.24 update. It installed , but upon
restarting
spamd I got error messages. I'd appreciate information on how to fix the
local.cf file.
Here is the log:
Mon Mar 24 10:56:02 2008 [22312] info: logger: removing stderr method
Mon Mar 24 10:56:09 2008 [22314]
You have (at leqase) some OLD 2.x stuff in that local.cf
http://readlist.com/lists/incubator.apache.org/spamassassin-users/0/4503.htm
l
Also, score have to be like '0.79' not '.79'.
Google for each option that failed. I think you will find that they are OLD
2.0 options, for the most part.
Also
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A side note:
| I have this in my cron to update the rules:
| 00 * * * * /usr/bin/sa-update --gpgkey 6C6191E3 --channel
sought.rules.yerp.org --gpgkey D1C035168C1EBC08464946DA258CDB3ABDE9DC10
- --channel saupdates.openprotect.com --channel updat
00 * * * * /usr/bin/sa-update --gpgkey 6C6191E3 --channel
sought.rules.yerp.org --gpgkey D1C035168C1EBC08464946DA258CDB3ABDE9DC10
--channel saupdates.openprotect.com --channel updates.spamassassin.org
--allowplugins
Am I missing anything?
Beside the other comments, throw something like
Marc Perkel wrote:
Henrik K wrote:
Hello,
I updated my FreeMail plugin with a big list of domains
(http://www.rhyolite.com/anti-spam/freemail.html).
Try it out:
http://sa.hege.li/FreeMail.pm
http://sa.hege.li/FreeMail.cf
Pretty good hit ratio here, especially when you add some extra scores
> -Original Message-
> From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, 21 March 2008 3:28 a.m.
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Cyrillic spam
>
> > > For some strange reason, I'm seeing Cyrillic spams very frequently
> > > lately.
> > >
> > > None
I'm running OpenBSD and I repeatably have trouble installing
SpamAssassin via CPAN. The (make) tests always fail. I usually
install by force but now I'm trying to understand what's going wrong.
I have attached the cpan session. Thanks to any responders.
/juan
__
My e-mail provider has SpamAssasin-3.2.1 installed.
But it ranks many spam messages very differently than my SpamAssasin-3.2.4 on
my computer.
For example message below is ranked score=2.2 by SpamAssassin-3.2.1 on my
provider with failing tests=RCVD_BAD_ID,RDNS_NONE.
And the same message is ran
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 02:24:38PM -0700, V V wrote:
> For example message below is ranked score=2.2 by SpamAssassin-3.2.1 on my
> provider with failing tests=RCVD_BAD_ID,RDNS_NONE.
>
> And the same message is ranked score=15.007 by SpamAssassin-3.2.4 on my
> computer with failing
> tests=RAZOR
>From what I see... it looks like perhaps your provider is doing only
local tests from within SpamAssassin (the RDNS_NONE is from the MTA
reporting no RNDS for that IP).
You, on the other hand, seem to be running networks tests + Razor.
- Jason J Ellingson
Fro
V V wrote:
My e-mail provider has SpamAssasin-3.2.1 installed.
But it ranks many spam messages very differently than my SpamAssasin-3.2.4 on
my computer.
For example message below is ranked score=2.2 by SpamAssassin-3.2.1 on my
provider with failing tests=RCVD_BAD_ID,RDNS_NONE.
And the same m
> > by dgw218.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl with smtp (Exim 4.62
We've been blocking adsl.tpnet.pl for over a year yet they still barrage
our servers daily with bot-infested clients. Some sites block the whole
.PL tld, but that's a bit evil IMO.
On Monday 24 March 2008 23:14:48 James E. Pratt wrote:
>. Some sites block the whole .PL tld, but that's a bit evil IMO.
I know a big corp who blocks the entire .org. worst part is that the bounces
go to the receiver instead the sender. "you got an email from your developer
contact , but you're
On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 at 18:14 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
by dgw218.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl with smtp (Exim 4.62
We've been blocking adsl.tpnet.pl for over a year yet they still barrage
our servers daily with bot-infested clients. Some sites block the whole
.PL tld, but that's
On Wed, March 19, 2008 18:42, Enrico Scholz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem that mails from internal (private) IPs generate
> SPF_FAIL hits. E.g. my configuration is
>
> | internal_networks 62.153.82.30
> | internal_networks 192.168.0.0/16
> |
> | trusted_networks62.153.82.30
On Thu, March 20, 2008 16:48, Enrico Scholz wrote:
> ok; fixed it by removing the 192.168.0.0/16 from
> 'internal_networks'. But problem still persists that senders
> from the private 192.168.0.0/16 network are tagged with SPF_FAIL.
if you have nic cards that are open to the air with that ip ra
Henrik K writes:
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 12:28:34PM +, Justin Mason wrote:
> > Henrik K writes:
> > > I updated my FreeMail plugin with a big list of domains
> > > (http://www.rhyolite.com/anti-spam/freemail.html).
> > >
> > > Try it out:
> > >
> > > http://sa.hege.li/FreeMail.pm
> > > htt
Quoting Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Well, as I said above no updates have been published since Jan 14th. So
> I would not expect any.
>
> However, sa-update's don't go in /usr/share/spamassassin. You'll *NEVER*
> see updates if you keep looking there. Feb 7th should be the date of
> yo
Sn!per wrote:
So my cron would look like this then?
00 * * * * /usr/bin/sa-update --gpgkey 6C6191E3 --channel sought.rules.yerp.org
--gpgkey D1C035168C1EBC08464946DA258CDB3ABDE9DC10 --channel saupdates.openprotect.com
--channel updates.spamassassin.org --allowplugins && /etc/init.d/spamd
Quoting Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Also, You shouldn't need to specify the keys and channels, unless you've
> got other channels installed on your system that you don't want to update.
>
sought.rules.yerp.org --gpgkey D1C035168C1EBC08464946DA258CDB3ABDE9DC10
> --channel saupdates.openp
On 24/03/2008 9:34 PM, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Sn!per wrote:
>
>> So my cron would look like this then?
>>
>> 00 * * * * /usr/bin/sa-update --gpgkey 6C6191E3 --channel
>> sought.rules.yerp.org --gpgkey
>> D1C035168C1EBC08464946DA258CDB3ABDE9DC10 --channel
>> saupdates.openprotect.com --channel
You would open a bug on the Bugzilla, and attach a patch; we then apply
that patch, and it's updated in the next release of SpamAssassin.
Is a CLA needed?
Loren
34 matches
Mail list logo
