> I'm seeing the below logs in my mail.log for every piece of e-mail.
> Not sure what I did that started this, FuzzyOcr WAS working fine..
>
> Mar 1 23:33:27 espphotography spamd[335]: (Can't locate object
> method "dummy_check" via package "Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus"
> at
> /opt/local/lib
Can you provide an example? I'm not sure what you mean.
You could probably do it with the "ALL" pseudoheader, but it'll
be very slow. A plugin might be the best option, but it's hard to
be sure without an example.
--j.
Claude Frantz writes:
> While writing rules
>
> How can I find how ma
Justin Mason wrote:
Can you provide an example? I'm not sure what you mean.
The most important example is the "Received" header which usually occurs
many times.
You could probably do it with the "ALL" pseudoheader, but it'll
be very slow. A plugin might be the best option, but it's hard
Claude Frantz writes:
> Justin Mason wrote:
>
> > Can you provide an example? I'm not sure what you mean.
>
> The most important example is the "Received" header which usually occurs
> many times.
yes, but what are you trying to match in there?
--j.
> > You could probably do it with the "AL
hi,
i think my spamassassin is performing no RBL checks, i disabled that
once, reset that change but it seems that the RBL are still not
working
i have got two different installations of spamassassin on one machine
(machine - A) the results are as expected. this is on SA v3.1.7,the
results are b
Id like to be able to say, if this message has over 5 points
dont deliver it at all.
With procmail installed you can do it.
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DeletingAllMailsMarkedSpam?
highlight=%28delete%29%7C%28spam%29
here is a way to have all spam forward to another mailbox but the
p
Hello,
I am using the TextCat plugin and the ok_languages functionality. When
running tests, I can see most of the times the language is guessed
correctly.
So I would like to add a rule to lower the score when the body is written
in my language, something like:
score DUTCH_LANGUAGE_BODY -0.50
pointers? I thought those were used in cpp programs... I do have a couple
of hints for ya.
*Better look at your init.pre file on machine B. You might have left the RBL
plugins commented out.
*And of course verify whether machine B has working DNS server.
*To test if RBLs are run, run spamas
Hi, people, I am currently researching, trying to implement a way for my
POP3 users to train SA via message forwarding. I've read in the list that
the messages should be forwarded as attachments. My question is how do you
make SA process them. I was thinking of creating two accounts (
[EMAIL PROTE
On 3/2/07, Sietse van Zanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
pointers? I thought those were used in cpp programs... I do have a
couple of hints for ya.
*Better look at your init.pre file on machine B. You might have left the RBL
plugins commented out.
*And of course verify whether machine B has
On 3/2/07, Luis Hernán Otegui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, people, I am currently researching, trying to implement a way for my
POP3 users to train SA via message forwarding. I've read in the list that
the messages should be forwarded as attachments. My question is how do you
make SA process th
oops, forgot to mention, you need to feed a sample message to spamassassin -D
--lint or it will not do network and RBL checks, only local checks.
-Sietse
From: Sandeep Agarwal
Sent: Fri 02-Mar-07 14:15
To: Sietse van Zanen; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: No RBL checks
On 3/2/07,
Kshatriya wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using the TextCat plugin and the ok_languages functionality. When
> running tests, I can see most of the times the language is guessed
> correctly.
>
> So I would like to add a rule to lower the score when the body is
> written in my language, something like:
>
>
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, Luis Hernán Otegui wrote:
Hi, people, I am currently researching, trying to implement a way for my
POP3 users to train SA via message forwarding. I've read in the list that
the messages should be forwarded as attachments. My question is how do you
make SA process them. I was
Thanks, It is using both directories. It appears that it isn't
subtracting the 50 points that it is supposed to when it is whitelisted?
Do you know if this setting is changeable?
Regards,
Mark
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 09:15:17AM -0500, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Mark Adams wrote:
> > Hi There,
> >
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: /etc/spamassassin or /var/lib/spamassassin?
>
> Thanks, It is using both directories. It appears that it
> isn't subtracting the 50 points that it is supposed to when
> it is whitelisted?
> Do you know if t
At 11:37 PM 3/1/2007, Evan Platt wrote:
I'm seeing the below logs in my mail.log for every piece of e-mail.
Not sure what I did that started this, FuzzyOcr WAS working fine..
Mar 1 23:33:27 espphotography spamd[335]: (Can't locate object
method "dummy_check" via package "Mail::SpamAssassin::
Mark Adams wrote:
> Thanks, It is using both directories. It appears that it isn't
> subtracting the 50 points that it is supposed to when it is
> whitelisted? Do you know if this setting is changeable?
Is it scoring the whitelist lower or is it just not hitting?
Can you post your whitelist rule
Hi list,
Perhaps this is the wrong place to ask this question, if it is please
say so.
I have a very strange problem with FuzzyOCR in combination with SA.
Because FuzzyOCR didn't work on my MailScanner machine, I started
experimenting by running spamassassin by hand like this:
$ spamassassin -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Setup: SA 3.1.8, Pyzor, Razor, DCC, iXhash
Botnet, FuzzyOCR 3.5.1, SARE rules, some misc rules
This message got 0 points. Does it score over 5 for anyone?
http://members.cox.net/dgoldsmi/spam/lowscore01.txt
Thanks,
David Goldsmith
=
David Goldsmith wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Setup: SA 3.1.8, Pyzor, Razor, DCC, iXhash
Botnet, FuzzyOCR 3.5.1, SARE rules, some misc rules
This message got 0 points. Does it score over 5 for anyone?
http://members.cox.net/dgoldsmi/spam/lowscore01.txt
Conte
Jim Maul wrote:
David Goldsmith wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Setup:SA 3.1.8, Pyzor, Razor, DCC, iXhash
Botnet, FuzzyOCR 3.5.1, SARE rules, some misc rules
This message got 0 points. Does it score over 5 for anyone?
http://members.cox.net/dgoldsmi/spam/lowscore
From: David Goldsmith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Setup:SA 3.1.8, Pyzor, Razor, DCC, iXhash
> Botnet, FuzzyOCR 3.5.1, SARE rules, some misc rules
>
> This message got 0 points. Does it score over 5 for anyone?
>
> http://membe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Maul wrote:
> Jim Maul wrote:
>> David Goldsmith wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> Setup:SA 3.1.8, Pyzor, Razor, DCC, iXhash
>>> Botnet, FuzzyOCR 3.5.1, SARE rules, some misc rules
>>>
>>> This message got
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
From: Jim Maul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jim Maul wrote:
David Goldsmith wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Setup:SA 3.1.8, Pyzor, Razor, DCC, iXhash
Botnet, FuzzyOCR 3.5.1, SARE rules, some misc rules
This message got 0 points. Does it s
I understand the theory of not wanting to incorrectly learn messages. But my
question is about that statements practicality in every situation. It makes
sense with a diverse user base, say an ISP, but what about a small company
with few users that are all competent to bot train and that will keep
Is there a way to have my PHP Script feed a message to SA to be
scanned? I can save the message as a text file if that'll help.
I'm using a hosted (shared hosting plan) web account with CPanel
access. I've noticed that email messages that have been routed through
my email forwarders are not
Arjan Schrijver wrote:
> I have a very strange problem with FuzzyOCR in combination with SA.
...
> $ spamassassin -D < spamtestmail.txt
>
> Everything works correctly when I run it this way. I get the debug output
> from SA and it shows that FuzzyOCR runs and detects the image spam.
> It also out
Hi,
I'm using SpamAssasin via qmail-scanner-queue and have SPF enabled. I sent
myself an email claiming to be from a domain which has an SPF record; the
record does not list the IP that I sent from.
Looking through the logs on my mailserver, none of the SPF tests triggered.
I located the file co
Hi,
It's been a long time since i've installed the last mail server.
My question is: how can one train SA to learn from SPAM messages not
marked as such by SA that already arrived at the server ?
Can we forward them to an account, let's say [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then
act some way over the ma
On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 12:40 -0800, Derek Harding wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 13:08 -0500, Don Ireland wrote:
> > Is there a way to have my PHP Script feed a message to SA to be
> > scanned? I can save the message as a text file if that'll help.
>
>
>
> #!/usr/bin/php -q
> open(TMP, ">/tmp/
On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 13:08 -0500, Don Ireland wrote:
> Is there a way to have my PHP Script feed a message to SA to be
> scanned? I can save the message as a text file if that'll help.
#!/usr/bin/php -q
/tmp/sa.$$") || die("Error opening temp file: /tmp/sa.$$");
print TMP $mess . "\r\n";
clos
I have been trying to figure out a way to do account level settings and
bayes filtering on our boarder filter server. I have found a way. However,
I had to make a change to the spamd perl script.
The part I changed was under 'handle_user'. It appears handle_user
requires a local account to b
From: Jim Maul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Jim Maul wrote:
> > David Goldsmith wrote:
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> Setup:SA 3.1.8, Pyzor, Razor, DCC, iXhash
> >> Botnet, FuzzyOCR 3.5.1, SARE rules, some misc rules
> >>
> >> This message got 0 points.
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, ram01 wrote:
> yes the learning folders are stored on the server. The same server is
> running IMAP, MTA, and SA. The site does not have a high load of email, so
> processor load shouldn't be a big issue, not to say that I don't care about
> efficiency.
Then this script may
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, Matt Kettler wrote:
You might be able to add a header rule that checks the X-Languages
pseudo header.
Great, this seems to work ! I learned something new, thanks a lot! :-)
K.
Hey folks,
I'm running 3.1.8 on OpenBSD 4.0-STABLE, with sa-update snagging
updates and a subset of the SARE rules. YAY sa-update, what a
snazzy addition to SpamAssassin. :)
I have report_safe set to 0 via SQL userprefs, so message bodies
are not modified, only headers.
Now, on spam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
C. Bensend wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
>I'm running 3.1.8 on OpenBSD 4.0-STABLE, with sa-update snagging
> updates and a subset of the SARE rules. YAY sa-update, what a
> snazzy addition to SpamAssassin. :)
>
>I have report_safe set to 0 via SQL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
C. Bensend wrote:
>It would be helpful if there were some list of all the macros that
> can be used, but I didn't find that either... Is there such a thing?
> I've been through the wiki and Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf and such...
perldoc Mail::Spam
> perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
>
> Search for 'TEMPLATE TAGS'
Geh. Ever stared at something so long, that you completely
miss the obvious? Yeah, me too.
Thanks a bunch, Dave.
Benny
--
"During the Armageddon, only two things will survive - cockroaches
and Cher."-- "W
>>I would very much like to add that to _all_ messages, and I
>> know how to do that (add_report all something blah), but the part
>> I'm missing is the "something" and the "blah".
>>
>>'add_header all FullReport _SUMMARY_' is almost there:
>
> This works for me:
>
> add_header ham Re
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, Mário Gamito wrote:
Can we forward them to an account, let's say [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
then act some way over the mails on that account ?
Not exactly. Your users will need to bounce/redirect/resend the
messages; this keeps them intact, which forwarding does _not_ do.
Alte
On Wednesday 17 January 2007 5:16 pm, Dan Barker wrote:
> Put tests=_TESTSSCORES(,)_ in your local.cf and you won't scratch your head
> so hard next time.
>
> It puts in lines like:
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.0 required=5.0
> tests=AWL=0.009,BAYES_50=0.001,SPF_PASS=-0.001,USER_IN_WHITELIST=-10
43 matches
Mail list logo
