[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote to me off list:
So, how whitelist the e-mail from users in my domain?
I'd be asking myself why there's a need to whitelist my own users.
Afterall, if you have to whitelist them to avoid their messages being
marked as spam, what do you expect is going to happen when the
You have to install these package via CPAN.
John Andersen ha scritto:
Everytime my SA-Update runs the output from the cron job shows these lines:
Use of uninitialized value in eval "string" at /usr/bin/sa-update line 91.
Use of uninitialized value in eval "string" at /usr/bin/sa-update line 91
>...
>On 10/23/2006 7:01 PM, John Rudd wrote:
>> Eric A. Hall wrote:
>>> http://www.ehsco.com/misc/spamassassin/std_compliance.cf might help or
>>> work for what you're doing.
>>>
>>> Make sure to read the disclaimers and warnings
>>
>> Those helped a lot. There's only three checks I can't do wit
* Marc Perkel wrote (23/10/06 19:34):
I'm considering filing a lawsuit against Microsoft to try to get an
order to make them make public security updates for Windows to everyone,
registered or not.
The idea is that their product Windows creates a toxic byproduct
(spam,ddos zombies) that inter
Hi,
I have a problem whereby spamassassin isn't always processing messages.
It is being called by SimScan.
I can see from the headers that SimScan IS being called but it doesn't
ALWAYS seem to be able to process the messages with SpamAssassin -
resulting in 300+ SPAM messages a day going int
David B Funk wrote:
Some of us pre-date Sir Timothy & his bright idea, had to make our
ones & zeros the hard way by banging two rocks together, had to learn
to find and read documentation. (I first ran into sendmail on a VAX-750
running BSD-4.2 in the early 80's).
Yeah, I've been doing Sendmail
Eric A. Hall wrote:
a) does the hostname in the PTR record point to a CNAME instead of an A
record
That's not illegal. It's pretty common too, since subnet delegation of
in-addr space only works on /8, /16 and /24 subnets due to the way that
octets are mapped to domain name labels in that hiera
Matt Kettler wrote:
By "All of the free BL services are enabled by default." I believe the
original author was not trying to say SA supported all BL services, but
that all of the free ones it does support are enabled by default.
So... it said that all of a *undefined list* are used? That's a
John Rudd wrote:
Eric A. Hall wrote:
On 10/23/2006 7:01 PM, John Rudd wrote:
b) does the hostname contain it's IP address in _hex_ form (instead
of in decimal form, which I've already got working)
I don't recall ever seeing that. If you create a rule for that you might
also want to do octal
John Rudd wrote:
http://people.ucsc.edu/~jrudd/spamassassin/jr_rfc1912.cf
I had to make an update:
The rule for the hostname having keywords for end clients was case
sensitive (forgot the /i at the end), and I added one more keyword: dip
Hi.
I'm using Spamassassin with Qmail+Vpopmail+Qmail-Scanner on Debian
Sarge, and I wish to use the user_prefs.
I start spamd with the following options "--create-prefs --max-children
5 --helper-home-dir -v -u vpopmail".
Spamassassin is trying to create the user_prefs file, but it can't
crea
On Monday 16 October 2006 01:21, Magnus Holmgren took the opportunity to say:
> What I'm saying is that
>
> $ sa-learn --spam < testmessage
>
> and
>
> $ sa-learn --spam testmessage
>
> give different results. I forgot to mention the version, 3.1.4 (Debian
> Etch). 3.0.3 (Debian Sarge) doesn't exhi
Don't worry about all of the security flaws currently in Windows. All
security holes are fixed in Vista or Longhorn upgrade.
Shane
-Original Message-
From: Chris Lear [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 5:38 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: I'm th
Dear users,
I recently discovered soms false positives from hotmail users. This
seems to originate from users which already are converted to there new
'live' website (instead of the old hotmail look).
What I see in the headers is that they changed there HELO:
Received: from BAY115-W3 ([65.54.250
On Sunday 15 October 2006 20:49, Magnus Holmgren took the opportunity to say:
> Apparently, when sa-learn reads a message from stdin, for some reason the
> entire header, and possibly even the empty line separating it from the
> body, disappears. Or at least $msg->get_header("Date") and
> $msg->get
I cannot beleive if some one says Windows is free of flaws... neither the
reviews of Vista are good
In my opinion Vista is not yet ready for the primetime. and with all its Jumbo
requirements, I dont think it can please the world.
-Chaitu
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Mulli
Nick Gilbert wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem whereby spamassassin isn't always processing
messages. It is being called by SimScan.
I can see from the headers that SimScan IS being called but it doesn't
ALWAYS seem to be able to process the messages with SpamAssassin -
resulting in 300+ SPAM mes
Don't know if anyone else has noticed.
http://www.spamcop.net/w3m?action=checkblock&ip=140.211.11.2
matt
Matt Hampton writes:
> Don't know if anyone else has noticed.
>
> http://www.spamcop.net/w3m?action=checkblock&ip=140.211.11.2
I wouldn't worry about it -- spamcop listed a quarter of my incoming ham
in August: http://taint.org/2006/08/17/142116a.html
--j.
On 10/23/2006 10:50 PM, John Rudd wrote:
> Eric A. Hall wrote:
>> On 10/23/2006 7:01 PM, John Rudd wrote:
>>> a) does the hostname in the PTR record point to a CNAME instead of an A
>>> record
>> That's not illegal. It's pretty common too, since subnet delegation of
>> in-addr space only works
On 10/24/2006 7:55 AM, John Rudd wrote:
> Here's an example for one I got tonight (I got 3, but trashed the others
> before thinking "I should send that as an example").
>
> (i577A0BC3.versanet.de [87.122.11.195])
>
> 577A0BC3 is the hex encoding of the IP address, with no separators.
That ma
Title: RE: Spam using local newspapers
> -Original Message-
> From: Maurice Lucas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 2:54 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Spam using local newspapers
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I receive some spam today using parts o
On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 08:13:35PM -0400, Joe Flowers wrote:
> Can I get away with this without any memory or resource leaks? Is this OK?
> my $spamtest = Mail::SpamAssassin->new();
> my $status = $spamtest->check($spamtest->parse($message));
[...]
> $status->finish();
Hrm. I would normally
On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 01:19:37AM -0800, John Andersen wrote:
> Use of uninitialized value in eval "string" at /usr/bin/sa-update line 91.
[...]
> Use of uninitialized value in eval "string" at /usr/bin/sa-update line 95.
>
> eval { use Net::DNS; };
[...]
> eval { use IO::Zlib 1.04; };
Just curi
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
James Lavery wrote:
Hi all,
Version: 3.1.4
OS - Unslung 6.8 on a Linksys NSLU2 (Slug)
Running spamd with fetchmail and postfix
How much memory do one of those things have?
I think it has 32MB IIRC. I just ordered one for my Asterisk system
Theo Van Dinter writes:
> On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 08:13:35PM -0400, Joe Flowers wrote:
> > Can I get away with this without any memory or resource leaks? Is this OK?
> > my $spamtest = Mail::SpamAssassin->new();
> > my $status = $spamtest->check($spamtest->parse($message));
> [...]
> > $stat
hi all,
I have done a setup with sendmail, procmail,
spamassassin to filter spam. When i look into my maillog i see many error like
this:
timeout waiting for input from local during
Draining Input
I use spamd -d
procmail:
:0fw: formail1.lock* ^X-Priority: 5|\
^Priority: Non-Urgent
Hey --
just to turn the tables for a bit ;), I've recently been considering a
problem and a possible solution, and could do with SpamAssassin users'
advice.
These days, I've been forced to use SBL/XBL as an upfront anti-spam check,
rejecting spam at RCPT TO: time during the SMTP transaction. (Pre
Justin Mason wrote:
Hey --
just to turn the tables for a bit ;), I've recently been considering a
problem and a possible solution, and could do with SpamAssassin users'
advice.
These days, I've been forced to use SBL/XBL as an upfront anti-spam check,
rejecting spam at RCPT TO: time during the
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 18:42:58 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason)
wrote:
>Hey --
>
>just to turn the tables for a bit ;), I've recently been considering a
>problem and a possible solution, and could do with SpamAssassin users'
>advice.
>
>These days, I've been forced to use SBL/XBL as an upfron
mouss writes:
> Justin Mason wrote:
> > Hey --
> >
> > just to turn the tables for a bit ;), I've recently been considering a
> > problem and a possible solution, and could do with SpamAssassin users'
> > advice.
> >
> > These days, I've been forced to use SBL/XBL as an upfront anti-spam check,
>
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 12:48:23PM -0400, Chris Santerre wrote:
>> From: Maurice Lucas [[1]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 2:54 AM
>> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>> Subject: Spam using local newspapers
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I receive som
> CAVEAT: just because the client is listed on sbl-xbl does not mean the
> message is spam. In particular:
> - a legit user may be sending through a listed server.
> - a spammer may "corpus-corrupt" you by sending ham messages (slightly
> modified copies from mailing lists)
I too like a lot SA s
Giampaolo Tomassoni writes:
> > CAVEAT: just because the client is listed on sbl-xbl does not mean the
> > message is spam. In particular:
> > - a legit user may be sending through a listed server.
> > - a spammer may "corpus-corrupt" you by sending ham messages (slightly
> > modified copies fro
Eric A. Hall wrote:
On 10/24/2006 7:55 AM, John Rudd wrote:
Here's an example for one I got tonight (I got 3, but trashed the others
before thinking "I should send that as an example").
(i577A0BC3.versanet.de [87.122.11.195])
577A0BC3 is the hex encoding of the IP address, with no separators
> Giampaolo Tomassoni writes:
> > > CAVEAT: just because the client is listed on sbl-xbl does not
> mean the
> > > message is spam. In particular:
> > > - a legit user may be sending through a listed server.
> > > - a spammer may "corpus-corrupt" you by sending ham messages
> (slightly
> > > mo
Eric A. Hall wrote:
On 10/23/2006 10:50 PM, John Rudd wrote:
Eric A. Hall wrote:
On 10/23/2006 7:01 PM, John Rudd wrote:
a) does the hostname in the PTR record point to a CNAME instead of an A
record
That's not illegal. It's pretty common too, since subnet delegation of
in-addr space only
I was being somewhat sarcastic. I am a BSD nut.
Shane
-Original Message-
From: Chinta, Chaitanya Sai Krishna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 8:56 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: I'm thinking about suing Microsoft
I cannot beleive if some one
Im looking to change scoring in my SA setup. As it stands now, we know mostly what e-mails and from who we will be receiving to our system that SA is monitoring. Id like to make our scoring a bit more strict. Right now Ive got spam being flagged at required score 1, and I still have a good 20% c
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Juan Mas wrote:
> Im looking to change scoring in my SA setup. As it stands now, we know
> mostly what e-mails and from who we will be receiving to our system that SA
> is monitoring. Id like to make our scoring a bit more strict. Right now
> Ive got spam being flagged at r
Jo Rhett wrote:
Right. Which proves that you weren't reading. I was replying to the
comment that someone made that any host with more than one address
would have more than one HELO. This isn't true.
Now a host with more than one interface might have more than one helo
name. But that's no
Hi Daryl,
Aha - yes I think you've right. The Slug only has (I think) 32MB of memory,
and the symptoms are definitely of swap thrashing.
So I presume what I should do is reduce the max children, and put up with
reduced spamassassin performance when a lot of mails come in.
James
-Original
From: "Chris St. Pierre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Juan Mas wrote:
Im looking to change scoring in my SA setup. As it stands now, we know
mostly what e-mails and from who we will be receiving to our system that SA
is monitoring. Id like to make our scoring a bit more strict.
Hi!
I'm having trouble signing up at
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/createaccount.cgi - I never
receive the email with the randomly-generated password. I've tried with
various e-mail accounts - none of them gets any email.
Could someone check if this is borken?
Thanks, Kai
From: "Chris Lear" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Marc Perkel wrote (23/10/06 19:34):
I'm considering filing a lawsuit against Microsoft to try to get an
order to make them make public security updates for Windows to everyone,
registered or not.
The idea is that their product Windows creates a toxic
Yeah, but that's only effective in the three or four copies they manage
to sell
{^_-}
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Mullins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Don't worry about all of the security flaws currently in Windows. All
security holes are fixed in Vista or Longhorn upgrade.
Shane
Don't even TRY to run SpamAssassin on such a small machine.
I ran a much earlier incarnation on a small machine and decided it was
just barely practical at the mail volumes of the time. It took about a
minute to scan each message. Moving to a larger machine helped. Moving
to a much larger machine
> > Only in America...
>
> It might have a better chance of working in Europe where hugely deep
> pockets are not as effective a defense against lawsuits as in the US.
> In the US not even the government has pockets deep enough to sue MS
> over this issue.
Oh, comeone: the last fee M$ had to pay
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 08:38:23 -0400
"Thomas Mullins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don't worry about all of the security flaws currently in Windows. All
> security holes are fixed in Vista or Longhorn upgrade.
>
> Shane
>
That is,
Until it starts being used. Then all of the issues will be f
James Lavery wrote:
Hi Daryl,
Aha - yes I think you've right. The Slug only has (I think) 32MB of memory,
and the symptoms are definitely of swap thrashing.
So I presume what I should do is reduce the max children, and put up with
reduced spamassassin performance when a lot of mails come in.
From: "Giampaolo Tomassoni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Only in America...
It might have a better chance of working in Europe where hugely deep
pockets are not as effective a defense against lawsuits as in the US.
In the US not even the government has pockets deep enough to sue MS
over this issue.
Kai Bolay wrote:
Hi!
I'm having trouble signing up at
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/createaccount.cgi - I never
receive the email with the randomly-generated password. I've tried with
various e-mail accounts - none of them gets any email.
Could someone check if this is borken?
An
> > > Only in America...
> >
> > It might have a better chance of working in Europe where hugely deep
> > pockets are not as effective a defense against lawsuits as in the US.
> > In the US not even the government has pockets deep enough to sue MS
> > over this issue.
>
> Oh, comeone: the last fee
Justin Mason wrote:
> However: it's important for SpamAssassin developers and mass-checkers to
> get a "representative" feed of spam -- with all kinds of spam included --
> so that the rules are measured against something close to reality.
On a related note, we actually *stopped* using front-line
> -Original Message-
> From: James Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, 24 October 2006 5:42 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: I'm thinking about suing Microsoft
>
>
> Holding the position of "most widely-attacked" is no reason
> for it to also be "least
>
I'm having the same problem. I dropped Spamcop and tried to have it email me my password/token and I don't receive the email.-DonOn 10/24/06, Daryl C. W. O'Shea
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kai Bolay wrote:> Hi!>> I'm having trouble signing up at> http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/createaccount
On Tuesday 24 October 2006 1:55 am, Dirk Bonengel wrote:
> Chris schrieb:
> > I've been seeing this quite a bit lately, is the site down or do the
> > timeouts need to be increased? Its currently set for the default 10
> > seconds.
> >
> > Oct 21 12:28:03 localhost spamd[19162]: ixhash timeout rea
Jo Rhett wrote:
Right. Which proves that you weren't reading. I was replying to
the comment that someone made that any host with more than one
address would have more than one HELO. This isn't true.
Now a host with more than one interface might have more than one
helo name. But that's n
Jo Rhett wrote:
> Matt Kettler wrote:
>> By "All of the free BL services are enabled by default." I believe the
>> original author was not trying to say SA supported all BL services, but
>> that all of the free ones it does support are enabled by default.
>
> So... it said that all of a *undefined
Juan Mas wrote:
> Im looking to change scoring in my SA setup. As it stands now, we
> know mostly what e-mails and from who we will be receiving to our
> system that SA is monitoring. Id like to make our scoring a bit more
> strict. Right now Ive got spam being flagged at required score 1, and
>
I'm just not getting it.. I have a whole list of custom rules, I use
RulesDuJour, I have custom scores to mark stuff higher.. I have reasonable
limits set.. the users do not adjust tings here, I do.. I use lint when I
add scores and rules..
So tell me.. how in the past week or so I have 11 mai
On 10/23/06, Bret Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am using Spamassassin 3.1.3 on Fc3 along with Postfix + MailScanner
> + Dovecot + Clamav + Squirrelmail + Mailwatch.
>
> I have already configured rulesdujour for sa and also doing sa-learn
> for few mailboxes as only few mailboxes r config
Debbie D wrote:
> I'm just not getting it.. I have a whole list of custom rules, I use
> RulesDuJour, I have custom scores to mark stuff higher.. I have reasonable
> limits set.. the users do not adjust tings here, I do.. I use lint when I
> add scores and rules..
>
> So tell me.. how in the pa
"Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Debbie D wrote:
>> I'm just not getting it.. I have a whole list of custom rules, I use
>> RulesDuJour, I have custom scores to mark stuff higher.. I have
>> reasonable
>> limits set.. the users do not adjust tings here
On 10/25/06, ankush grover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/23/06, Bret Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am using Spamassassin 3.1.3 on Fc3 along with Postfix + MailScanner
> > + Dovecot + Clamav + Squirrelmail + Mailwatch.
> >
> > I have already configured rulesdujour for sa and also doi
Debbie D wrote:
> "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> Debbie D wrote:
>>
>>> I'm just not getting it.. I have a whole list of custom rules, I use
>>> RulesDuJour, I have custom scores to mark stuff higher.. I have
>>> reasonable
>>> limits set
ankush grover wrote:
>
>>
>> > If you can't find the code in the list archive, I probably have it
>> > somewhere.
>>
> If you can give me a hint about the software that will help me in
> searching in the archives.
>
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/MailingLists
Under the "users" list, there are
Europeans have sued Microsoft many times.
Chris Lear wrote:
* Marc Perkel wrote (23/10/06 19:34):
I'm considering filing a lawsuit against Microsoft to try to get an
order to make them make public security updates for Windows to
everyone, registered or not.
The idea is that their product Win
Anyone have any suggested statistics suites I can use for reporting at
the MTA level and from within spamassassin? Would be great to be able to
present some metrics on total mail statistics and then compare what
portion of that is spam, and how many are being caught/quarantined every
day, etc.
On Tuesday 24 October 2006 08:56, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 01:19:37AM -0800, John Andersen wrote:
> > Use of uninitialized value in eval "string" at /usr/bin/sa-update line 91.
> [...]
> > Use of uninitialized value in eval "string" at /usr/bin/sa-update line 95.
> >
> > ev
continuing with the pop-posting
They are installed Simone.
[1107] dbg: diag: module installed: Digest::SHA1, version 2.11
[1107] dbg: diag: module installed: Net::DNS, version 0.58
[1107] dbg: diag: module installed: MIME::Base64, version 3.07
[1107] dbg: diag: module installed: HTML::Parse
Jason Haar wrote:
Now if only it could deal with this storm of "VIiiagra"/"VIragra" spam
that has been sneaking in... :-)
The rules I posted in the "Scoring PTR's" thread seem to be doing a
great job of catching those.
>> Exim 4.52 with SA and ClamAV I use spamc
>>
>Oh, one other condition that can cause a "tests=none".. if the size of
>the message is greater than the -s parameter to spamc.. (default 250k )
Well that theory definitely does not hold water in this case :) the paypal
one is 4k and most of the oth
Chris schrieb:
On Tuesday 24 October 2006 1:55 am, Dirk Bonengel wrote:
Chris schrieb:
I've been seeing this quite a bit lately, is the site down or do the
timeouts need to be increased? Its currently set for the default 10
seconds.
Oct 21 12:28:03 localhost spamd[19162]: ixhash timeo
Christopher Martin wrote:
Anyone have any suggested statistics suites I can use for reporting at
the MTA level and from within spamassassin? Would be great to be able
to present some metrics on total mail statistics and then compare what
portion of that is spam, and how many are being caught/qu
I use Mailscanner-mrtg, http://mailscannermrtg.sourceforge.net/
Obviously I'm running my spamassassin with Mailscanner
http://www.mailscanner.info/
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 12:04 AM
To: Users @ Spam Assassin M
>-Original Message-
>From: Christopher Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 9:25 PM
>To: Users @ Spam Assassin Mailing List
>Subject: Statistics and reporting
>
> Anyone have any suggested statistics suites I can use for reporting at
the MTA level and from with
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:24:55 +1000, Christopher Martin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Anyone have any suggested statistics suites I can use for reporting at
>the MTA level and from within spamassassin? Would be great to be able to
>present some metrics on total mail statistics and then compare what
unsubscribe
This e-mail is sent on the Terms and Conditions that can be accessed by
Clicking on this link http://www.vodacom.co.za/legal/email.jsp
"
79 matches
Mail list logo
