RE: Autolearn doesn't work

2006-09-19 Thread Carsten
Yep, now it's working. Debian exim/sa-exim/spamassassin solution lets SA run as user Debian-exim. During some investigations, I found out that bayes wasn't running at all (due to unspecified db directory). At that time, I must have run spamassassin manually under root, thus creating one of the fi

RE: Autolearn doesn't work

2006-09-19 Thread Carsten
Yep, now it's working. Debian exim/sa-exim/spamassassin solution lets SA run as user Debian-exim. During some investigations, I found out that bayes wasn't running at all (due to unspecified db directory). At that time, I must have run spamassassin manually under root, thus creating one of the f

RE: Autolearn doesn't work

2006-09-19 Thread Carsten
Yep, now it's working. Debian exim/sa-exim/spamassassin solution lets SA run as user Debian-exim. During some investigations, I found out that bayes wasn't running at all (due to unspecified db directory). At that time, I must have run spamassassin manually under root, thus creating one of the f

Re: Autolearn doesn't work

2006-09-19 Thread Carsten
Yep, now it's working. Debian exim/sa-exim/spamassassin solution lets SA run as user Debian-exim. During some investigations, I found out that bayes wasn't running at all (due to unspecified db directory). At that time, I must have run spamassassin manually under root, thus creating one of the f

RE: Autolearn doesn't work

2006-09-19 Thread Carsten
Yep, now it's working. Debian exim/sa-exim/spamassassin solution lets SA run as user Debian-exim. During some investigations, I found out that bayes wasn't running at all (due to unspecified db directory). At that time, I must have run spamassassin manually under root, thus creating one of the f

Spamassassin + Exim4 high iowait

2006-09-19 Thread Mark Adams
Hi All, We are running exim4.62-4 with Spamassassin 3.1.4-4 on Debian testing and are suffering extremely high IO Wait times on the server whenever spamassassin scans an incoming email. Exim4 is setup as defaults (spamd running locally on standard port) so no configuration was changed. Spamassas

Whitelisting URIs

2006-09-19 Thread Jerry Gaiser
For some reason my domain name (gaiser.org) is now listed in AB SURBL blocklist and PH SURBL blocklist. When I get replies to email I send *and* the reply includes my normal signature (which includes a link to my webpage), the reply ends up in my spam folder. Is there a way to whitelist specifi

Re: Whitelisting URIs

2006-09-19 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 09:35:30AM -0700, Jerry Gaiser wrote: > Is there a way to whitelist specific URIs and/or is there a way to get my URI > removed from the blocklists? uridnsbl_skip_domain example.com > For some reason my domain name (gaiser.org) is now listed in AB SURBL > blocklist and PH

FP: URI_NOVOWEL

2006-09-19 Thread mouss
URI_NOVOWEL fires with things like href="#id" where id is a string that starts with 7 "no-vowel" chars. To fix this, I replaced uri URI_NOVOWEL m%^https?://[^/?]*[bcdfghjklmnpqrstvwxz]{7}%i with uri URI_NOVOWEL m%^https?://[^/?\#]*[bcdfghjklmnpqrstvwxz]{7}%i is this cor

Re: OT: HELO setting in Sendmail

2006-09-19 Thread mouss
Mike Pepe wrote: Hi folks, this is a bit off topic, but I figured someone here may have an inkling as to what I could do. Some mail servers are now rejecting my email: (reason: 550 Don't like your HELO/EHLO. Hostname must contain a dot.) I checked and sure enough, the HELO just spits out

Re: OT: HELO setting in Sendmail

2006-09-19 Thread Daniel T. Staal
On Tue, September 19, 2006 5:01 pm, mouss said: > Mike Pepe wrote: >> Hi folks, this is a bit off topic, but I figured someone here may have >> an inkling as to what I could do. >> >> Some mail servers are now rejecting my email: >> >> (reason: 550 Don't like your HELO/EHLO. Hostname must conta

Re: FP: URI_NOVOWEL

2006-09-19 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 10:58:46PM +0200, mouss wrote: > URI_NOVOWEL fires with things like href="#id" where id is a string that > starts with 7 "no-vowel" chars. > > uri URI_NOVOWEL m%^https?://[^/?]*[bcdfghjklmnpqrstvwxz]{7}%i > uri URI_NOVOWEL m%^https?://[^/?\#]*[bcdf

Re: OT: HELO setting in Sendmail

2006-09-19 Thread John Rudd
Daniel T. Staal wrote: On Tue, September 19, 2006 5:01 pm, mouss said: Mike Pepe wrote: Hi folks, this is a bit off topic, but I figured someone here may have an inkling as to what I could do. Some mail servers are now rejecting my email: (reason: 550 Don't like your HELO/EHLO. Hostname m

Message headers not being added

2006-09-19 Thread Jonathan Hilgeman
Here are the vitals: Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.5 Platform: Fedora Core 2 Qmail 1.03 / Vpopmail / Qmail-Scanner 1.2.4 So here's the deal. E-mails are received by Qmail, scanned for viruses (BitDefender) and spam by Qmail-Scanner, and put into the correct mailboxes by Vpopmail. Qmail-Scanner a

Re: Message headers not being added

2006-09-19 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 05:54:04PM -0700, Jonathan Hilgeman wrote: > So I'm looking for anyone that might have experience with this setup and > has it working properly. At first I thought of trying the Qmail-Scanner > mailing list, but since this may be an issue with how I installed > SpamAssassin

RE: Message headers not being added

2006-09-19 Thread Jonathan Hilgeman
Murphy's Law: You can spend days researching a problem, and the MOMENT you give up and decide to annoy other people with your petty question, you stumble across the answer. There was a variable in qmail-scanner that held command-line arguments, and it was defaulted to running spamc with the -c opt

all setup

2006-09-19 Thread Dhaval Patel
I just wanted to thank everybody for a great product and for helping me configure spamassassin. My users and I are seeing that 99% of the spam is being caught and no ham is being flagged as spam. This is great news. Thank you again. Dhaval

Re: Whitelisting URIs

2006-09-19 Thread Matt Kettler
Jerry Gaiser wrote: > For some reason my domain name (gaiser.org) is now listed in AB SURBL > blocklist and PH SURBL blocklist. When I get replies to email I send *and* > the reply includes my normal signature (which includes a link to my webpage), > the reply ends up in my spam folder. > > Is t

Installation Errors

2006-09-19 Thread Thomas Meier
Hi,   Having trouble installing Spam Assassin 3.1.5 (and the same error with 3.1.1) on a stock standard Windows Server 2003. It also has build 819 of Perl installed on it.   Has anyone else had this error and managed to get around it?   I’ve installed all needed packages via the new P

Re: Whitelisting URIs

2006-09-19 Thread Jerry Gaiser
On Tuesday 19 September 2006 19:32, Matt Kettler wrote: > Jerry Gaiser wrote: > Report the mis-listing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > It seems strange that it's listed in PH.. did you get hacked recently > and abused by a phisher? > > Also, FWIW, you appear to have already been delisted. At least > http:

Re: Message headers not being added

2006-09-19 Thread Loren Wilton
There was a variable in qmail-scanner that held command-line arguments, and it was defaulted to running spamc with the -c option, which just returned the score. As soon as I cleared out the -c, qmail-scanner started processing the message and added all those wonderful headers back into the mix. Pr

Re: Whitelisting URIs

2006-09-19 Thread Loren Wilton
Anyone have any ideas what's going on? spamassassin -D

Integrating SpamAssasin 3.x with BlackList

2006-09-19 Thread Lists
Title: Integrating SpamAssasin 3.x with BlackList Hello! I run SpamAssassin with QmailScanner and Qmail1.03; i entered in local.cf the configuration to use some blacklist but it is not sufficiente to block spam. How can i enable the SpamHaus, CBL, RBL (as example) blacklist-realtime check?